WORLD STONER GAMES

The World Stoner Games consists of five events that will showcase stoner prowess in the areas of …

Thu Jul 17, 2008 more videos 12

sponsored links
high times presents

MOVIE REVIEW: The Darjeeling Limited

Tue, Oct 16, 2007 12:44 pm

more: movies

-
By Brian Abrams

In 1998, Wes Anderson was critically lauded for his prep school slacker flick Rushmore, and it all went downhill from there. Ever since, the writer/director has puked up the most pretentious and annoying movies onto the big screen, and they get worse every time.

More than a decade ago, when Wes Anderson teamed up with Luke and Owen Wilson to shoot his quirky debut Bottle Rocket, the Texas trio made a pretty funny and charming buddy comedy out of it. With little budget and a lot of heart, Rocket emitted a sort of just-cocking-around-with-the-camera feel, as if the film's culprits weren't taking the whole thing so seriously. Rushmore has a faint sense of that carefree vibe – it's arguably Anderson's best – but, beyond that, Anderson's other films are smug.

Take The Royal Tenenbaums and The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, for examples: both cloying and colorful movies, they provided fantasies for fruit loops who envy the empty lives of these spoiled rotten characters. Both are a gas to watch if you're into loud watercolor palettes, but, when it comes to plot and direction, the meat and potatoes of moviemaking, they're both weak at the knees.

The Darjeeling Limited follows this same arty farty formula, another platform for Anderson to show off his eye for hipster art direction and his disdain for actual storytelling.

The movie follows three rich kid brothers (Owen Wilson, Schwartzman, Adrien Brody) across India on a “spiritual” journey so they can bond with one another and overcome the grief from their father's death from one year ago. The excuse for a plot reminds me of the cinematic disaster Garden State, in which our leading man (another cutesy actor, Zack Braff) struggles with post-adolescent anxiety by scooting around town on a vintage motorcycle while listening to EMO rock and with Natalie Portman by his side.

Poor baby.

The same goes for this silver spoon-fed crowd, who heal heartache by shopping for chochkies in the Eastern Hemisphere, smoking cigarettes wherever they please, and shtupping an exotic beauty in a train car. To investigate further into these characters' “tortured” lives, Anderson has provided a short film prequel online (www.hotelchevalier.com) which shows Schwartzman's poet character lounging in a sexy French hotel room with yet another character played by Portman... these guys have it rough, huh?

And, aside from the agony of watching these brats “find themselves," even worse is tolerating Anderson's celluloid masturbation; creating unnecessary sequences only so he can show off his eye for aesthetic. So much energy is spent on mixing sheik outfits with colorful backdrops.

One sequence has us watch the three lament over a boy's death at an Indian village just so Anderson can continue filming a powder blue stucco wall in the background. Then, the three brothers all exit in white pajamas and walk in slow motion to the native's funeral. In another scene, Brody's character argues with shaving cream on his beard – just because he looks cool that way.

Sigh. How I miss the carefree, fun n' fratty filmmaking of Bottle Rocket. I'd pray that Anderson would revert back to that somehow, but I'm afraid it's a little useless. His movies still have that cocking-around-with-the-camera feel, but it's ostensibly for his own enjoyment, not ours.


» add a comment

Bored to be back in DC

Nov 25 2007, 10:40 am

Yeah, it's not Renoir's "The River", and self-indulgent hip is way too tired and arrogant in its precious spleen; however, film is more than narration, or perhaps narration is a broader concept then story, as has been displayed at various points in the historically nascent art of film. Anderson is the top phony, true, but the ingenuousness of the sentiment displayed, however lacking in dramatic depth, make these films, like those of Richard Linklater, worth watching; if not for the faux-resplendent prose, then at least for the mental wanderings of the films's mood and atmospherics.

Aldous Huxtable

Nov 18 2007, 8:55 pm

...hopefully this person isn't on payroll. "Arty farty"...watch the film again, and please do make sure that the review actually corresponds to the correct film.

royal

Nov 18 2007, 3:45 am

he should do things for his own enjoyment, thats what arts about. not pleasing others. if you wanna please others make some more fucking die hard movies and scream movies. or make a new backstreet boys band. fucking sheeple

sweet lime

Nov 15 2007, 8:59 pm

what a bogus review of an awesome movie...you see it's all about embracing our humanity and realizing that we are not, in fact, heroes; yet we all are still on the heroes' journey...this is what Wes Anderson's films are all about and why they totally rock

tunombre

Nov 9 2007, 1:35 pm

brian abrams are you unhappy with life? answer is....ohhh yeah.

summarizing a movie and adding angered and jealous remarks on the side isnt how you review a movie. get over your personal problems with wes anderson, zack braff, and natalie portman (what are you gay?)and maybe just maybe you'll find peace in life.

p.s. you know damn well if you had any kind of motorcycle you'd be riding that thing everywhere

sf

Nov 4 2007, 3:15 pm

this guy sounds like a cop

Doc

Oct 31 2007, 4:41 pm

Brian, are you sure you meant to submit this review to High Times? I mean based on how bitter and angry you seem toward a movie that personally I thought was not only very good but also very funny, you don't seem like you get stoned too often.

My advice, get some Sour Diesel or better yet some Ooky Kabuki, warm up your vaporizer, smoke that shit and then go see Darjeeling Limited again.

Austin

Oct 30 2007, 10:56 pm

I think his movies are actually pretty intelligent, your overall intellect and attention span is just probably pretty low...

HarrYcHronICJr

Oct 26 2007, 5:53 am

I thought that this movies was supposed to be ironic. i am sad to the that it wasnt. ha ha some one got a light?

the shit

Oct 21 2007, 11:34 pm

Wes anderson is genius his artsy outtake on movies is stunning my favorites are life aquatic the royal tenebaums and the new darjeeling limited... ive seen all of them high very high and i loved these movies

santa fe stash

Oct 21 2007, 6:07 pm

Go ahead Sammy b follow the piper.

Sammy B.

Oct 21 2007, 8:22 am

I think what he is saying is that it got too stuck up its own ass with style. I can relate. That movie Adaptation did stuff like that. Annoying.

george

Oct 19 2007, 7:17 pm

This is perhaps the worst movie review in existence; it's biased and flat out stupid.

Incognito's Gay Lover

Oct 19 2007, 1:36 pm

Yeah. I mean, I LOVE to snuggle up with my partner and watch Owen's hair go flippity-flap in the wind.

Incognito

Oct 18 2007, 3:39 pm

This guy is full of shit. Life Aquatic was awesome and all of Wes Anderson's films are worth looking at. Hipster trash? Have you watched a Hollywood movie in the past 5 years Brian?

thCeasar

Oct 17 2007, 9:56 pm

You're a little too cynical as a critic for my taste, Brian. I'm not defending the movie or anything, I haven't even seen it, it just that you come off as sort of a dick. Of course, it would be wrong for me to presume that you wrote this review with the intention of it being the definitive opinion; you simply provide an insight based off your own criteria for cinematographic mastery. Basically what I think I'm trying to say is fuck movie reviews and critics. Actually, based off my own logic I would have understood this before writing this comment, so fuck me too.

» add a comment

search

headlines
sponsored links
seed center
headshop

STONER CITY BOARD GAME

It's the game of owners and stoners that makes you the head of your ver own budding business. Buy, sell, grow, and trade, all the while trying to keep up with rowing demand for your....uh, product.

more headsop products

The Latest At Norml