MPP on the 420 Campaign
Fri, Apr 20, 2007 4:47 pm
Who knows what drives prohibitionists to block sensible marijuana policy reform with such fervor?
If you're reading this, then you've got your own theories. Maybe it's culture war residue from paranoid Nixonians who believed aversion to war was marijuana's most dangerous side effect. Maybe it's the net effect of 70 years of wild-eyed, race-tinged anti-marijuana propaganda. Maybe it's all those drug warriors who depend on the marijuana war for their livelihoods.
It doesn't really matter, because the solution is the same: marijuana policy reform, ultimately at the federal level.
April 20 is as good a day as any to step back and assess our progress so far.
The most egregious element of the federal government's war on marijuana users – criminalizing seriously ill patients who rely on marijuana as part of the treatment regimen they developed with their doctors – is crumbling fast.
Through public education, popular state ballot initiatives shepherded by tireless advocates, and partnerships between advocacy groups and compassionate, sensible lawmakers at every level, nearly a quarter of this nation's states now protect a patient's right to medical marijuana.
More states are adopting medical marijuana laws every year as evidence of the drug's safety and efficacy grows. Just last month, New Mexico became the 12th state to establish medical marijuana laws, and similar legislation is getting serious consideration in Minnesota and Illinois as well.
As a result, pressure on federal legislators to reconcile cruel, outdated roadblocks to patients' access to medical marijuana builds.
Prohibitionists' willingness to sacrifice the sickest and most vulnerable among us simply to gain an advantage in their war against marijuana users only reveals the cynicism that impedes the rational, civil policy discussion marijuana reform deserves.
Opponents of marijuana policy reform, when making the ridiculous claim that marijuana is far more dangerous today than in the past, are fond of saying, "This is not your father's marijuana."
Well, these are not your father's marijuana reformers. Advocates for sensible, effective marijuana policy are pragmatic, organized, dynamic, and energetic. They include medical professionals, public policy experts, economists, politicians, civil rights and privacy advocates, taxpayer watchdogs, clergy members, liberals, conservatives, and anyone else concerned about the ever-growing reach of the federal government into the private lives of responsible Americans.
And their ranks are growing. For many, such as former U.S. Congressman Bob Barr, the turning point will come over concern about the federal government's increasing encroachment into the affairs of private citizens and local governments. Once a strong opponent of medical marijuana, Barr recently signed on as a lobbyist for the Marijuana Policy Project to work with his former colleagues to protect states' right to determine their own policies on medical marijuana.
Marijuana reform is inevitable as long as we stay informed and stay active. Activists can't do it alone. We need you.
Dan Bernath is the Marijuana Policy Project’s assistant director of communications, www.mpp.org. Email him at dbernath@mpp.org.





» add a comment
Prohobition
Sep 6 2007, 6:54 am
"A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law, Indeed, insofar as a stature runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
Pohibition, "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to to enforce it."
Uneducated jury!
State of Georgia vs. Brailsford, et al 3 Dall.1
Every jury in the land is tampered with and falsely intructed by the judge when it is told it must take (or accept) as the law that which has been given to them, or that they must bring in a certain verdict, or that they can decide only on the facts of the case.
"If it is posssible that such a practice as that which has taken place in the present instance should be allowed to pass without a remedy, trial by jury itself, instead of being a security to persons who are accused, will be a delusion, a mockery, and a snare."
Prohobition
Sep 6 2007, 6:54 am
"A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law, Indeed, insofar as a stature runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
Pohibition, "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to to enforce it."
Uneducated jury!
State of Georgia vs. Brailsford, et al 3 Dall.1
Every jury in the land is tampered with and falsely intructed by the judge when it is told it must take (or accept) as the law that which has been given to them, or that they must bring in a certain verdict, or that they can decide only on the facts of the case.
"If it is posssible that such a practice as that which has taken place in the present instance should be allowed to pass without a remedy, trial by jury itself, instead of being a security to persons who are accused, will be a delusion, a mockery, and a snare."
budpriest
Apr 27 2007, 3:30 pm
Chronicles 4:20-The lampstands of pure gold with their lamps, to burn in front of the inner sanctuary as prescribed
Luke 4:20-Then he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant and sat down. The eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fastened on him.
Amen
KILL MY LANDLORD!
Apr 24 2007, 9:45 pm
.................... ..,../¯ ..//
.................... ..../... ./ /
.................... ..,/¯ ..//
.................... ./... ./ /
............./´¯/' ...'/´¯`•¸
........../'/.../... ./... ..../¨¯
........('(...´(... ....... ,~/'...')
................... ..... ../..../
..........''....... ..... . _.•´
................... ..... ..(
................... ..... ...
"CHRISTIAN REBUKE"
Apr 24 2007, 9:40 pm
2 Timothy 4:2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine.
Titus 1:13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
Many people erroneously think that someone who is rebuking another does so only out of hate, as they misidentify those who do the rebuking as having a spirit of hate. However, the Bible is clear that to avoid rebuking is to avoid loving, and that those who love will rebuke.
Revelation 3:19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.
Proverbs 9:8 Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: rebuke a wise man, and he will love thee.
Proverbs 13:24 He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.
Proverbs 27:5 Open rebuke is better than secret love.
Next, rebuking another often involves name-calling, shaming and embarrassing the other one when exposing his error, often offending him in the process. And yes, it is certainly Biblical to do so.
REPROVE 1651 elegcho {el-eng'-kho}
of uncertain affinity; TDNT - 2:473,221; v
AV - reprove 6, rebuke 5, convince 4, tell (one's) fault 1, convict 1; 17
1) to convict, refute, confute 1a) generally with a suggestion of shame of the person convicted 1b) by conviction to bring to the light, to expose 2) to find fault with, correct 2a) by word 2a1) to reprehend severely, chide, admonish, reprove 2a2) to call to account, show one his fault, demand an explanation 2b) by deed 2b1) to chasten, to punish
kleer response. bye!^
Apr 23 2007, 7:06 pm
"C3"
Apr 23 2007, 12:01 pm
"C3"
Apr 23 2007, 11:52 am
...
Apr 22 2007, 1:34 pm
bob fukin barr !?!?
Apr 21 2007, 1:49 pm
damn there must be hope for legalization.
i must admit that before he started siding with aclu about 2 years back. i hated everything that this barr guy stod for-excluding his pro-gun position, just to admit hat there is a little to like about eveyone.
but now it seems someone has spiked his coffee with happy
GOin to jail
Apr 21 2007, 12:55 am
"C3"
Apr 20 2007, 8:17 pm
Thy Ninjalette
Apr 20 2007, 8:17 pm
88#
Apr 20 2007, 8:03 pm
Bummer, Dude!
Apr 20 2007, 6:04 pm
» add a comment