Will Obama Legalize It?
Election Day 2008 marked the end of an error. For the cannabis community, change couldn’t come soon enough.
Tue, Jan 20, 2009 10:14 am
By Paul Armentano
Over the last eight years, America’s 25 million regular marijuana users have lived under a dark cloud – namely, the federal government’s draconian assault on their lives and liberties. The police made an unprecedented 6.3 million pot arrests under President Bush, who also reneged on a campaign promise to let states decide their own medical-marijuana policies, resulting in the indictment of more than 100 state-authorized cannabis patients and providers, many of them now serving multi-decade sentences in federal prison. Meanwhile, John Walters, our nation’s longest-serving and least competent Drug Czar, railed senselessly about weed – blaming pot smokers for September 11, equating the therapeutic use of cannabis to “medicinal crack,” and alleging that not one single American is serving time behind bars for pot possession.
Now our community turns its hopeful eyes to a new president, and perhaps our best opportunity in more than three decades to help usher in a new direction in pot policy. So what are some practical and immediate steps the Obama administration can take to de-escalate the senseless war on marijuana smokers?
First and foremost, the new president must uphold his campaign promise to end the federal prosecution of state-authorized med-pot patients and providers. President Obama can do this by appointing leaders at the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney General's office who will respect the will of the voters in the 14 states that have already legalized the physician-supervised use of medical marijuana. Obama can further protect the health and safety of patients by encouraging the relevant government agencies to review a 2002 petition to reschedule cannabis so that doctors can prescribe it legally. (As a candidate, Obama described such a change in pot’s classification as “entirely appropriate.”) The president should also demand that the DEA abide by the Bittner decision, a 2007 ruling by the agency’s own administrative law judge that allows for the cultivation of medical-grade cannabis by non-governmental entities.
Finally, Obama can use the power of the Executive Office to encourage broader marijuana-policy reforms, specifically by calling for the creation of a bipartisan presidential commission to review the budgetary, social and health costs associated with federal marijuana prohibition. A rational, open-minded examination of this issue would almost certainly lead the Obama administration to join forces with leading Democrats like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) and Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts) in calling for an end to federal penalties for any cannabis use by adults.
These are just a few of the actions that Barack Obama could – and should – take as America’s 44th president. But will he? The answer remains largely up to us. Remember, the new administration presents us not with a solution, but with an opportunity. It’s up to us to seize it by continuing our civic engagement well beyond Election Day.
Obama on pot:
“I would not have the Justice Department prosecuting and raiding medical marijuana users. It's not a good use of our resources."
"I inhaled frequently" "That was the point"










» add a comment
rocktheganj@
Jul 3 2009, 11:15 am
peace in the middle east
rocktheganj@
thomas paine
Mar 24 2009, 7:31 pm
FAIL
TheGreatCujo33
Feb 16 2009, 7:49 pm
Harry From Jersey
Feb 2 2009, 10:40 pm
tosh marley
Feb 2 2009, 4:33 pm
530myke
Feb 2 2009, 2:19 pm
cv
Feb 1 2009, 11:11 pm
Who Knew?
Feb 1 2009, 6:11 pm
umm
Feb 1 2009, 6:01 pm
Those pleas of kill me kill me in the nursing homes tell me otherwise.
If he does not legalize, then I will not feel ANY pitty for the collapse of the dollar.
umm
Feb 1 2009, 5:21 pm
obongma
Feb 1 2009, 4:48 pm
not hypoxic
Feb 1 2009, 1:48 pm
umm
Feb 1 2009, 1:29 pm
longtimeuser
Feb 1 2009, 12:17 pm
I have gone a few months with out it but no biggie... A few years ago I found out I have MS. and then had a bad accident that has left me with pain ever since. Some of the drugs they have give me really make me sick and this is the only thing that helps. If you try to tell me this is not helping, you are wrong, in small doses it is the only thing that get me through my day. I don't smoke like I use to but if it helps people make it through the day everyone should be more open to it.
Dee Pression Jr.
Feb 1 2009, 2:00 am
Obama did say he may try to regulate it. Lots of folks are worried about that, I know. I once bought some hash from a co-op here in the San Fernando Valley. It tasted like napalm. I took two hits - two too many. A half hour after smoking it, my nose began to bleed uncontrollably. The next morning, I brushed my teeth and spat out blood from my gums. So, this is why regulation may not be such a bad thing after all, and why I only buy organic MMJ.
SORRY IT'S SO DAMN LONG!
BongSmoke
Jan 31 2009, 9:10 pm
not hypoxic
Jan 31 2009, 10:55 am
Tommy the Terrorist
Jan 30 2009, 8:17 pm
THANK YOU, for your support, you crazy americans.
Hard Worker
Jan 30 2009, 3:44 am
bluntsmoker
Jan 30 2009, 12:04 am
YUMMYbudds
Jan 29 2009, 3:14 pm
Benway
Jan 29 2009, 2:33 pm
But we'll see. It it never popular to be controversial.
blunt
Jan 28 2009, 3:08 pm
hmac
Jan 28 2009, 11:18 am
hmac
Jan 28 2009, 11:03 am
hmac
Jan 28 2009, 10:25 am
Smoker4ever
Jan 27 2009, 3:35 am
smoke420style
Jan 26 2009, 7:51 pm
smoke4life
Jan 26 2009, 5:22 am
boxcar09
Jan 24 2009, 9:27 am
anonymous
Jan 23 2009, 11:30 pm
Dont miss it
Jan 22 2009, 8:17 am
Spread the word!
#1
Jan 22 2009, 7:57 am
lonzo_joe
Jan 22 2009, 7:36 am
das
Jan 22 2009, 1:37 am
http://www.cnbc.com/id/28621704
YES WE CANnabis ;)
the obvious answer is...
Jan 22 2009, 1:30 am
Fernando Morales
Jan 22 2009, 12:13 am
All that work and now your telling me I might not make a profit...
dont worry about it
Jan 21 2009, 9:01 pm
beentheredonethat
Jan 21 2009, 8:45 pm
Uh...
Jan 21 2009, 7:55 pm
Baltimore Fred again
Jan 21 2009, 6:29 pm
to below
Jan 21 2009, 5:40 pm
Wow
Jan 21 2009, 5:39 pm
Hey PIGGY COP
Jan 21 2009, 4:52 pm
cop's full of shit
Jan 21 2009, 4:44 pm
gstlab3
Jan 21 2009, 3:26 pm
LadyToker
Jan 21 2009, 2:43 pm
Right now, the biggest thing to do next is to move cannabis from Schedule 1 to Schedule 3. Marinol, synthetic THC, is Schedule 3, due to its excellent safety record.
Support NORML in their efforts towards rescheduling. Decrim and eventually legalization will follow!
Ohio Boy
Jan 21 2009, 5:09 am
immolation
Jan 21 2009, 3:56 am
donnie
Jan 21 2009, 2:37 am
sirsmokesalot420
Jan 21 2009, 1:07 am
Last thing a Drug Lord wants is drugs to be legalized.
Heres one of the many stories:
Lets say a young child with no mother or father is out in the street. How could they survive? Chances are they are going to steal food like bread and whatnot but he won't stick to that forever. No one will take him in except for those that feel his pain which are those that have had the same life growing up. So he gets involved with, I guess you could say criminals. He has to start making money and fast. He starts dealing drugs and eventually gets caught. Ends up going to jail for, let's say 8 years, he is now involved more in a life of crime due to a stay in jail. Because he is a felon no one will hire him, what do you think he's going to do now? Go back to selling drugs. Just remember this is just one story, think about all those others out there stuck in a shithole. We will never have a drug free world, never have and never will. There were never laws against drug use that's why we need to educate and regulate. Remember alcohol prohibition? Remember shamans? C'mon man, seriously..
Marijuana is not a gateway drug, cigarettes are.
Teenagers that smoke cigarettes are 50% more likely to try marijuana and from the way it looks, cigarette use is dropping while marijuana use is increasing. If legalized we can treat it like the other legal substances and keep it away from the street where young children can obtain it.
I don't think these cops realize what they are doing, they are ruining the economy without realizing it. The Drug War is a failure, its so obvious and someone needs to snap them out of it.
Decriminalizing/legalizing would help the economy in one way or another. For one it would prevent the incarceration of innocent people, people that have a normal life and support their families. Throwing those people in jail can harm families and we need laws to protect them. There are those that ruin it for the people that choose to use it responsibly. If decriminalization/legalization were to be passed, I say it would keep people from experimenting with other drugs and come down the ladder. In other words I view it as an anti-drug, and what's better than being all natural? They have come up with the idea of obtaining a license in order to purchase the substance, similar to alcohol and it would make it harder for children to get their hands on it because apparently it is much easier getting marijuana out on the street than it is to get alcohol and cigarettes. It would only make sense to treat marijuana the same as those legal substances. Some prefer alcohol and some prefer cigarettes but what about those that don't prefer one out of those two? Some just prefer marijuana. It is said that it could send the wrong message to children but thats all the more reason to educate and regulate. Don't fear it, embrace it. Need I say more?
Dave Grohol
Jan 21 2009, 12:57 am
President Barack Hussein Obama
Jan 21 2009, 12:37 am
All tax schedules will be worked out in the coming weeks.
Thank you,
Barack Obama
American pot smoker
Jan 20 2009, 11:52 pm
Legalize for America.
DontReadThis
Jan 20 2009, 9:27 pm
Emboldened by their research and public comments, the city council members called for an override of the veto, spurring a week-long debate on whether there should be a national discussion about drug legalization. A debate about debating, if you will.
On the southern side of the border, lawmakers are talking about the El Paso debate as well. Juarez lawmaker Victor Quintana, who proposed the Chihuahua State Congress initiate a similar debate in 2008, said, "I don't think it hurts anyone to initiate this debate, because the drug war has failed all over the world."
You can be part of the debate by sending a strong message to your member of Congress in support of a national discussion on drug policy.
Unfortunately, the El Paso city council's override vote ended in a tie, and Mayor John Cook's veto of the unanimously-passed resolution was upheld. It wasn't as if the city council members changed their minds on calling for a national debate; rather, four of the eight council members who originally supported the resolution ultimately reversed their votes under significant federal pressure, with three council members specifically citing two letters: one from U.S. Congressman Silvestre Reyes, and one from the El Paso's state legislative delegation. The letters threatened El Paso with the loss of state and federal dollars if the council voted to override the veto and pass the resolution.
I attended the meeting, and you can view my testimony before the council here. Also in attendance was an aide to Congressman Reyes, who articulated the threats to the council should the resolution pass.
City Rep. Beto O'Rourke, who championed the council resolution, summed it up best: "It's a sad day in America when you are threatened for wanting to have an open debate on an issue that is affecting our country and our region."
As you know, prohibition will never curb border violence related to the illegal drug trade, nor will it ever reduce any of the devastating consequences associated with illegal drugs. The only way to reduce illegal drug-market violence is to legalize and regulate drugs, putting the cartels out of business.
I'm outraged at this blatant use of federal pressure to silence an open discussion, and I hope you are too. Drug prohibition is an issue that profoundly affects our country, and for our elected officials to resort to threats in order to prevent such a necessary debate contradicts the very core of democracy.
When confronted by the Huffington Post, Congressman Reyes said that he is not opposed to a debate on legalization; he only opposed the 'timing,' as it would coincide with President Barack Obama's meeting with Mexican President Felipe Calderon and Congress's debate of the economic stimulus package. Reyes said, "If it's still an issue [after the stimulus passes], I'm not opposed to perhaps even entertaining a hearing. I can look at that if they want to pursue it."
Take action now! Visit http://www.DrugWarDebate.com to ask YOUR federal and state representatives to support a blue ribbon commission reviewing the efficacy of drug prohibition. Please help us hold Congressman Reyes to his pledge!
You know you can trust LEAP to make sure the failed "war on drugs" is "still an issue" until the day it ends. Please support LEAP by making a tax-deductible contribution. Your generosity is what sustains LEAP, allowing our speakers to further extend our mission of education and outreach on the failure of drug prohibition.
Thanks for your support,
Terry Nelson
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
P.S. Please help LEAP with a monthly pledge or as generous of a donation as you can afford if you want to see us continue our efforts to get policymakers to take this issue seriously.
magoo
Jan 20 2009, 9:13 pm
waka waka
Gonzo
Jan 20 2009, 8:27 pm
Baltimore Fred
Jan 20 2009, 8:16 pm
D
Jan 20 2009, 8:11 pm
"a stoner doesn't usually work therefore he/she shouldn't be aloud to smoke marijuana. The last thing this country needs are more stoned welfare recipients."
I believe it marijuana were legal more people would not be denied jobs due to non-violent drug offenses. I also believe with it being legal a majority of the "Stoners" would find a career they would enjoy. i.e Grower, Marijuana related business owner, Distributor
Massachusetts Cop
Jan 20 2009, 7:36 pm
I know you all say "well people are aloud to drink alcohol aren't they?"
Well, yes, but they usually choose to drink after a hard days work. Whereas, a stoner doesn't usually work therefore he/she shouldn't be aloud to smoke marijuana. The last thing this country needs are more stoned welfare recipients.
kinder
Jan 20 2009, 6:26 pm
Sometimes i have to hit the refresh button 3 times to get the page current.
And on the issue at hand,I'm take-n-it to the streets.
PEACE!!!!!!!!
Maybe?
Jan 20 2009, 5:40 pm
bumbaclot!
Jan 20 2009, 5:08 pm
danko
Jan 20 2009, 4:59 pm
pho20joe
Jan 20 2009, 4:31 pm
Watch out for Big Brother
Jan 20 2009, 4:26 pm
burnout bernie
Jan 20 2009, 4:21 pm
Corey
Jan 20 2009, 3:51 pm
umm
Jan 20 2009, 2:38 pm
Love to the imbibers!!!
♥
Captain Canada
Jan 20 2009, 2:34 pm
Roachkilla
Jan 20 2009, 2:31 pm
maxChron
Jan 20 2009, 2:16 pm
Reality Check
Jan 20 2009, 2:05 pm
Sorry . I take their word for it .
rasta
Jan 20 2009, 1:25 pm
danko
Jan 20 2009, 1:21 pm
Now That
Jan 20 2009, 1:14 pm
Good riddance Bush & Cheney
Reality Check
Jan 20 2009, 1:10 pm
taco
Jan 20 2009, 12:56 pm
BigRonRizzles
Jan 20 2009, 12:47 pm
also think of all the money they'd make on it.it'll be the best taxed thing i'd pay for plus could pay of the U.S. debt in about 8 yrs.i'd put money on that.
rasta
Jan 20 2009, 11:33 am
HU210
Jan 20 2009, 11:33 am
HU210
Jan 20 2009, 11:31 am
You heard it here first.
HU210
Jan 20 2009, 11:22 am
SteWieH
Jan 20 2009, 10:54 am
» add a comment