Cannabis Column: The Top Ten Obstacles to Marijuana Law Reform
Fri, Jun 26, 2009 1:27 pm
Jon Gettman is a long time contributor to HIGH TIMES. A former National Director of NORML, Jon has a Ph.D. in public policy and regional economic development and consults with attorneys, advocates, and non-profits on cannabis related research and public policy issues. On October 8, 2002, along with a coalition of organizations, he filed a new petition to have cannabis rescheduled under federal law. This column will track that petition's progress.
The Top Ten Obstacles to Marijuana Law Reform
A lot of people think that the pharmaceutical industry is one of the most powerful opponents to marijuana’s legalization. They don’t realize that these companies stand to make billions of dollars off of the chemical compounds contained in marijuana in a legal regulatory climate. The reality is that the current restrictions on marijuana make scientific research on marijuana-related pharmaceuticals too expensive to pursue, and the restrictive regulatory climate concerning anything related to marijuana creates too much uncertainty about future sales and profits to justify developing marijuana related drugs. Even if marijuana were legal and widely available, there would still be a valuable market for a marijuana-based painkiller that was 50 to 100 times more powerful than the herb itself.
Many others think the alcohol industry is another potential opponent to marijuana’s legalization. However, they realize that the popularity of alcohol has withstood the test of time, not to mention marijuana’s immense popularity over the last several decades. Legal marijuana is not a threat to their profits, and if it were, they would just enter the business themselves.
But if not the pharmaceutical and alcohol industries, what are the greatest obstacles to marijuana’s legalization? Here’s a list of the top ten obstacles. They can all be overcome, but they all represent formidable opponents to marijuana reform.
#10 - Conservative opposition to the Obama Administration. A cautionary note – there are many conservatives in favor of legalizing marijuana, and not just dedicated libertarians. For example, Rich Lowry, editor of the National Review, wrote a superb article in favor of marijuana reform in 2001. But there aren’t many conservatives who support the Obama Administration. For example, also turn to the National Review, particularly their popular blog, The Corner, for a good sampling of conservative criticism of the President, his agenda and his policies.
Conservatives are looking for issues to both rally their base and reassemble their successful coalitions of years past. Tough anti-drug policies were a staple of the Reagan era, and a return to the policies of this period are advocated by some conservatives as the key to a conservative comeback in American electoral politics. Regardless of the conservative agenda, many Democrats will resist marijuana’s legalization out of concern that it will provide conservatives an easy target to exploit. On the other hand, support for legalization could be a part of a successful strategy by conservatives to appeal to younger voters. There is an ongoing debate in conservative circles about how to rally support to their cause and oppose Obama’s policies. The complexities of this debate, and its effect on their liberal opponents, represent a potential obstacle to marijuana’s legalization.
#9 - Anti-drug crusaders. Drug abuse is a serious issue, and efforts to prevent, reduce, and treat drug abuse attract many serious, sincere, and dedicated individuals whose valuable work is worthy of respect and support. Many people in the prevention profession have mixed feelings about marijuana; while in favor of discouraging its use, especially by teenagers, they also recognize that our current laws often have counter-productive effects, such as making marijuana readily available to all age groups. Nonetheless, there are many individuals and organizations in the anti-drug abuse movement who believe that opposing marijuana’s legalization is integral to their efforts. The Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America (CADCA) is a prominent example. Arguments against marijuana’s legalization are a prominent part of their public policy materials, and, for example, they argue that “Medical marijuana [is] being used as wedge issue to legalize drugs by a few wealthy individuals who have otherwise been unable to advance their personal political agendas.”
#8 - Drug War funding benefactors. The federal Office of National Drug Control Policy recently published a summary of the FY 2010 budget for the programs that implement federal drug policy. The entire budget request is for $15.1 billion, an increase of 1.5% over the budget for FY2009. The budget includes $238.6 million for the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities (SDFSC) National Programs, $90 million for Drug-Free Communities programs and $70 million for the ongoing national Media Campaign. The budget delivers $3.4 billion in funds for domestic law enforcement, which includes many avenues for providing assistance to local law enforcement, such as the ONDCP’s program for providing $220 million for law enforcement activities in High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas. These funds are used for all anti-drug programs, not just those focused on marijuana. These funding streams, though, create constituencies that provide political support to preserve and maintain this flow of federal money. CADCA, for example, encouraged its members and supporters to support funding for the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities program. Many of those individuals and groups that receive federal anti-drug funding oppose marijuana’s legalization. In addition to their policy positions, they believe their work is important and deserves continued financial support from the federal government.
#7 - State prosecutors. In 2007 there were 97,582 arrests in the United States for marijuana sales, 5.3% of all drug abuse arrests. The sale of marijuana is a felony under state law. Career prosecutors gain professional advancement by accumulating felony convictions. There is nothing sinister about this; it’s their job to convict people arrested by police for felony crimes. From their perspective, anyone arrested with more than a few ounces of marijuana possesses more marijuana than should be allowed for personal possession and should be prosecuted for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute it. Under many circumstances these defendants represent potentially easy convictions for career prosecutors. Prosecutors have a limited view of marijuana use; they come into contact with people charged with serious crimes and they associate marijuana use with criminal behavior – they have little contact with most marijuana users, most of whom do not commit crimes (other than possessing marijuana.)
#6 - The Urine Testing Industry. Do a Google search with the term ‘Urine Testing for Drug Abuse,’ and you’ll get close to 1 million hits. That’s a pretty reliable indicator that there is a lot of information in circulation about urine tests for drugs, whether it concerns companies selling tests, policies about testing at work or in the criminal justice system, or targeted at people just trying to beat the tests. Take a look at the ads on the right hand side of the page. Urine testing for drugs is big business, and marijuana is the most commonly use illegal drug. In 1991 the drug testing industry had estimated revenues of $340 million. Now it brings in nearly $2 billion annually. The Drug and Alcohol Testing Industry Association (DATIA) has over 1,300 members, represents more than 1 million companies in the industry, and their members perform more than 60 million drug and alcohol tests per year. Legalization will significantly reduce the revenue for this industry by reducing the justification for marijuana-related urine testing.
#5 - Foreign drug cartels. In late December 2008, Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard indicated he would be willing to consider the legalization of marijuana as a way of defunding foreign drug cartels. Goddard spoke at a press conference announcing the breakup of a Mexican drug ring responsible for bringing 400,000 lbs of marijuana into Arizona every year since 2003. According to Goddard, marijuana, was responsible for 75% of the money Mexican cartels use for other operations. While currently opposed to marijuana’s legalization, Goddard believes that all options should be on the table. Despite massive and growing domestic cannabis production capabilities, a large amount of the marijuana consumed in the United States is imported. Legalization will cost foreign operations considerable profits; they aren’t about to give this up without a fight.
#4 - Progressive political priorities. Marijuana’s legalization has never been a priority for political progressives. While many liberals and progressives are sympathetic to drug policy reform in general and supportive of marijuana’s legalization in particular, other goals have usually been more important. Issues such as ending US military involvement Iraq, reducing global warming, reforming the US health care system, equal rights for gays and lesbians, and continued opposition to conservative political priorities have been progressive political objectives over the last decade. Legalization will require political support from legislators and political leaders, and they must be encouraged to support legalization from a wide spectrum of activists and organizations. One of the greatest obstacles to marijuana’s legalization is the low priority it represents for many liberal and progressive activists.
#3 - Ignorance. Scientific research has refuted all of the hysterical claims about marijuana that were circulated during the 20th century, however many people don’t know this. Marijuana use does not lead to addiction to more dangerous drugs, it does not cause an amotivational syndrome that makes people lazy and unproductive, and it does not cause birth defects. Most Americans are fairly ambivalent about adult marijuana use, but for some reason they are still concerned that if marijuana were legal it would be easier for teenagers to acquire it. Data on teenage marijuana use disputes this point. Most teenagers find marijuana is fairly easy to acquire, indeed marijuana is so expensive these days that it is profitable for teens to sell it their friends, making it even easier to get. Ignorance is one of the greatest obstacles to marijuana’s legalization, but it is also one of the easiest to overcome.
#2 - Apathy. Over 25 million Americans use marijuana on annual basis, and there are 14.4 million monthly users. Public support for legalization is at an all time high. And yet many marijuana users are not politically active. Support for reform groups such as the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) and NORML has been stronger over the last few years than ever, however both have a long way to go before their membership numbers reach hundreds of thousands or millions of members. Many marijuana users are young and politically inexperienced; many others still believe that marijuana will never be legalized and political activity is not worth their time, money, or interest. And yet their involvement is all it will take to overcome the obstacles to legalization listed above. None of these obstacles can prevent legalization once it has earned widespread support from a majority of the American public. Increasing political activism by marijuana users, such as through the activities of MPP, NORML, and The HIGH TIMES 420 Campaign, is a sure way to achieve the legalization of marijuana.
#1 - Overconfidence. Almost as bad as apathy, overconfidence is the single most significant obstacle to marijuana’s legalization. While many marijuana uses think legalization will never occur, it seems that just as many are so convinced it is inevitable they don’t bother to take part in activities to bring it about. These are good times for marijuana reform, but there are no guarantees. This is not a time for over-confidence; it’s a time for action. This is not a time to sit and watch other people get the job done, it’s a good time to get involved. It is crucial for marijuana users to understand that the battle for marijuana’s legalization is now underway. Now is the time to overcome the obstacles to legalization and make history.










» add a comment
PIXXXIEdank
Oct 20 2009, 5:26 pm
pacopuff salmons
Oct 10 2009, 4:12 pm
Nezashak
Sep 26 2009, 10:04 am
We have been robed of our freedom just like gays we are told we can't smoke and if you do we'll though you in jail with killers, theives, and others.
USA was founded by our great fathers to make a country in which everyone has a say so and it should be the people legalize marijuana not the president not the government we the people.
Nevaar
Aug 29 2009, 2:13 am
In colorado, getting the registration card is a snap. I have osteoarthritis in my hands and knees, so I was a shoo-in. Anyway, Amendment 20 to the Colorado state constitution allows for immediate use of dispensary services, as soon as the Dr has signed the paper and you've sealed the envelope. Last week I (legally) picked up a mixed 1/2oz of G-13, AK, couple of others (tasty!).
Heh, mind wandered for a moment.
Well the state is supposed to approve, or deny, a request and let the user know within 30 days (give or take). Currently though, the process is backlogged to more than double the allowed 30 days.
As more people sign up, the backlog will increase to the breaking point. The state has less than $zero to add personnel with. Unless you consider the HUGE taxes that our dispensaries are paying to the state.
If you or a loved one have had any diagnosis whatsoever of chronic pain, arthritis, headaches, PMS, or any other covered affliction, you need to get a copy of your medical records and call a dispensary immediately!
TreeHunger
Jul 25 2009, 6:54 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIrJRc4P94Q
aren't going to be MY FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS
stoneyrepublican
Jul 13 2009, 7:54 am
dragon
Jul 12 2009, 11:00 pm
soccerdad
Jul 12 2009, 10:21 am
The same arrguments you make can be made against alchohol. So maybe we should make that illegal; oh wait, we tried that once. We will never stop pot use, so let's at least regulate and tax it, instead of sending billions to drug cartels. I propose paying for part of healthcare through pot taxation.
Pot would be harder to get if regulated. I smoked as a youth because I didn't know how to get alchohol. I was exposed to harder drugs because they are illegal too. If I go to a grocery store to buy a pack of joints...there are no harder drugs to be had there.
It's time to wake up and fight this issue SMARTER not harder. I don't want my kids smoking or drinking, this does not send a mixed message- most adults are capable of making good decisions- kids aren't.
skyhigh
Jul 12 2009, 8:51 am
BettyJames
Jul 11 2009, 4:52 pm
treehugger
Jul 9 2009, 10:31 pm
WHEN THE FUCK IS THE CHURCH GONNA START???
DIZZLE
Jul 9 2009, 5:18 am
www.misshightimes.com/users/dizzle
lostsouls
Jul 8 2009, 12:43 pm
http://vlex.com/vid/connie-sue-heater-harvey-timothy-mccoy-37692761
check the statistics & pass it around
HU210
Jul 8 2009, 12:24 pm
So who is advocating that teenagers have access to pot? Besides you that is.
Every other point that you express has been debunked by the scientfic community. Do some research.
That said. You are entilted to your uninformed opinion.
@xisxs
Limiting to 3 or 11 plants is foolish. Some of us like to GET HIGH, not tea-total. How much will it cost to have cops moniter this pipedream?
If the government wants $$$ it can tax hemp. Getting the government out of our personal lives is the object here.
patrick
Jul 8 2009, 7:53 am
http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/109678.html
xrisxs
Jul 7 2009, 12:02 pm
bongbarian`
Jul 6 2009, 10:07 pm
Soccer Mom
Jul 6 2009, 8:15 pm
treehugger
Jul 4 2009, 9:03 pm
Wonder what Lithuania had when they went down, twice now! The second after we went over there and saved them.
Bet they don't have these;
Cray XMT-massively multithreaded platform;
CPU 500 MHz single 64-bit Cray Threadstorm Processor
128 threads per processor
4 or 8 GB per processor
AMD Opteron socket 940 compatible
96 CPUs per cabinet(max), 8024 CPUs per system (max)
Network
2 Gb/s Fiber Channel disk to DDN and Engenio RAID
1 GbE and 10Gbe network connections
bongbarian
Jul 4 2009, 1:17 pm
treehugger
Jul 3 2009, 5:57 pm
When I have to think that hard, I got to NORML, and send all my rep's and the prez a copy. If nothin else, maybe it'll shut down a server or two (bet the got them Cray XMT's sizzlin).
treehugger
Jul 2 2009, 7:24 pm
VOTE NO FUCKING WAY ON BILL HR 875, aka the Monsanto Bill, powered by CODEX, will be swept through Congress, no media, no debate!
No public knowledge, until the ink has dried.
Welcome to the real world, you're gonna need another planet!
Globalization changed FDA’s environment for regulating products. Based on the volume of imported products, FDA identified China, India, the Middle East, Europe, and Latin America AND MEXICO as areas in which to establish a permanent presence.
We need all that help to feed 300 million obese, diabetics? And we're the most technologically advanced civilization in history? You can kiss this planet goodbye!
I don't know about you, but I'LL NEVER BUY ANYTHING FROM CHINA, OR ANY OF THOSE COUNTRIES, ESPECIALLY ANYTHING DEEMED "EDIBLE" BY THE FDA.
Brazil, maybe. Peru, can't see how they can grow enough for themselves, but o.k. El Salvador - not a fuckin chance!
And if you want Mexico to grow our food, build my canal. Brownsville to Baja.
changegovt woo
Jul 1 2009, 9:38 pm
treehugger
Jul 1 2009, 2:24 pm
At least he knows the Constitution - and told the states it's their duty to change their own laws...unfortunately, it doesn't appear as though Congress is gonna do a fucking thing to nationalize this movement. For another century?
jesus was a hippie
Jun 29 2009, 3:21 pm
Ignacio Nova
Jun 29 2009, 2:34 pm
gstlab3
Jun 29 2009, 1:41 pm
Vince
Jun 28 2009, 10:03 pm
steven in iowa
Jun 28 2009, 4:37 am
Bongbarian
Jun 27 2009, 12:05 pm
10) Opp. to Obama- Non issue. True in theory as he 'can not make the change', however removing it from federal scrutiny & making it a STATE ISSUE, as they are calling for w/the medical mj movement, circumvents this issue.
9) Anti-drug crusaders- Its not the GUN, its not DRUG, its the Person. TRUTH blows away these sheep/swaggerts/dillusional bushmen/busybodies. ANYBODY PREACHING DRUG WAR SHIT IN 2009 NEEDS TO BE VERBALLY TORE TO PIECES. Not to tough armed w/any of the pertinant facts.
8)Drug War funding benefactors- Legitimate concern. Although 15.1 billion was a (months expenses?) for the invasion of Iraq. hmm
7) State prosecutors- If a state prosecuter feels jailing people for weed is important they either- are new/rookies, anal retentive, or need to find a new line of work(like the texas trooper tasering the 72 yr old woman & Chicago congressman Mark Kirk ).
6) The Urine Testing Industry- ok. They, like the background check people who thrived as a result of the DRUG WAR, simply need to adapt their game. Free market baby, get off our buds.
5) Foreign drug cartels??? For Herb? Like we cant smash/out produce them? And exactly which politicians, businesses, modes of influence & lobbiests do they control??? Well...
4) Progressive political priorities- Very true. Massive amount of issues. HOWEVER POT SMOKERS CREATED NONE OF THE CURRENT PROBLEMS, OTHER THAN GETTING CAUGHT UP IN THE INSANITY OF THE DRUG WAR. Make the time to correct the wrong, its worth it.
3) Ignorance- Finally, deprogram the sheep. AN ACCURATE EXPOSE ON THE PRO'S & CON'S OF WEED WILL GO FARTHER TO OBTAIN SANITY & JUSTICE THAN ANYTHING. TRUTH PLEASE!
2) Apathy- Many of the old school reformers are passive in nature, the aggressive ones have watched the bullshit for too long & retrenched w/profanic curses for the ignorant. Unprogrammed youth(too aware, too smart)-30 & under will tip the scales.
1) Overconfidence- Easy to be right now if your a big picture guy. Prison for weed?? Need a cash crop??? Jobs anyone??? Relaxing, healing, laughing, expanded sense awareness, meditative/spiritual conduit, appitite enhancer, anti anxiety, PEACEFUL SENSE OF BEING- Its 2009, the bushmen are gone, isnt it time for this type of CHANGE?
* pharmaceutical industry - PLEASE, you dont think the bottom line is going to get hit?? Get that needle out of your arm buddy. Sure they may recoup, like they really need to, but the amout of people(such as myself-rec. smoker 25 years- med. toker 3 yrs, after trying & kicking pills)who ditch the pills for herb will be quite substantial.
** Alchol consumption goes down as herb smoke goes up(no pun), but yes they'd survive or enter the market.
*** Social Ramifications- The increase of consumption, mostly in "main st" america could skyrocket, female use especially(the rich & poor already smoke to hearts content). Productivity for this group, which carries the country & pays for the aforementioed groups, is a concern if responsible parameters are not made clear.
**** Implementation- Perhaps the biggest hurdle as it will not be easy & we have seen this Countries track record for the last bit of time. The budz are tough enough (not really)but how about hemp & its multiple markets??? Who is smart enough to get it done & how could it be accomplished?? (Without stealing the show & ruining a good thing)
neverexhale
Jun 27 2009, 10:56 am
The private prison business is a huge one as legalizing marijuana would vastly reduce the prison population and thus the need for their "services".
The timber industry is still a major obstacle as there is still concern there over hemp cutting into paper, textile and building materials demand.
Oil producers are another obstacle as there's concern that hemp may prove to be an efficient source of biofuel.
Overall, business interests such as these are the biggest obstacle to legalization as they are the ones with the conviction to withdraw or withhold support for candidates based on something as narrow in scope as their willingness to support or oppose legalization while the public has never found drug policy to eclipse things like foreign policy or economic policy in importance and realistically, it's unlikely that it ever will.
Since overwhelming public demand is unlikely, the only realistic way to overcome the obstacle of big business interests that oppose legalization is to get big businesses who could profit from the legalization of marijuana to actively press for it. Drug policy isn't important to many people but money is important to most. When there is a a significant financial gain to be had among those with lobby power that eclipses that of those who stand to lose money, then there will be a chance for legalization to occur. until then, it will always remain a pipe dream.
treehugger
Jun 27 2009, 4:17 am
It's oppression, the super rich elitest fucks don't want an uneducated person to be able to "get rich" or just make a living by watering a weed...especially if, "it makes you stupid and lazy".
But none of that should matter now. It's obvious that the majority of the population is FRIENDLY, and if the gov't still refuses to act -
AN ABSOLUTE DISGRACE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS
200 years of talkin shit and walking with a big stick, but nothing near a democratic process.
BearMan
Jun 27 2009, 12:56 am
Black G
Jun 26 2009, 7:29 pm
Teahupoo
Jun 26 2009, 4:44 pm
Most are privately held corporations AND you would be surprised at how many PROMINENT politicians and political leaders own significant positions in these companies.
It is PROFITABLE for them to incarcerate people, obviously, since we imprison 25% of the world's prisoners with ONLY 5% of the planet's population.
Land of the free?
NOT BY A LONG SHOT
Teahupoo
GoVaporize.com
LAbusted
Jun 26 2009, 4:38 pm
THANK YOU GOV AND YOUR WONDERFUL LAWS!!!!!!!!!
FREE THE WEED!!!!!! LET PEOPLE LIKE ME ENJOY WHAT WE WANT WITH OUT GOING TO JAIL!!!!!!!
Bobby D
Jun 26 2009, 4:02 pm
AboveTheFlat.com
Jun 26 2009, 3:27 pm
What I am not an expert in is marijuana (more appropriately its prohibition/legalization), in which I have recently become very interested.
I really appreciate the article as I know there are greed factors involved, but the ones most people tell me don't make sense (tobacco companies wouldn't want it). This clears up, and creates a few more questions though.
Most prominent of my question is that of the political power of the people and said peoples' apathy. I'm trying to understand where the real hangup is on that side. I mean, do you not think that if there was just one question asked at the polls ("Legalize pot: Yes or No") that even the most apathetic of marijuana users would find the initiative to vote? I honestly feel they would.
So then, isn't the problem in the elected officials (my vote is yes)? It seems to me that the problem in this regard is the flip/flop nature of the whole voting system. That some would love the idea of legalization, but that getting behind a certain runner would mean they were backing an issue they didn't agree with; and thus choosing to side with the lesser of evils in their rights.
No. I feel that it's not so much a political problem with the direct issue of marijuana's legalization, but that the voting system on specific issues as a whole leaves something to be desired. Surely if we could vote on issues specifically instead of people we are to trust to handle them, there would be no issue. At least with pot.
gstlab3
Jun 26 2009, 2:21 pm
» add a comment