Police Chief Refuses to Enforce New Marijuana Laws
Fri, Jan 02, 2009 9:17 pm
Source: NECN.com
A new year, and a new law taking effect in Massachusetts today. Now people possessing an ounce or less of marijuana will no longer face jail time. Tonight the police chief in Auburn, says he's against the law, and will not be enforcing it.
The state's new law which decriminalizes small amounts of marijuana went into effect at noon time Friday. but some who enforce the law are not happy about it.
Auburn police chief Andrew Sluckis is a critic of the changes. He says the new law which makes possession of less than an ounce of marijuana a civil offense is too lenient.
Violators will now face a 100 dollar fine. Sluckis says that under the law there is not a way to make offenders pay the fine, so he wont make his department issue them.
Director of the Worcester county chapter of the ACLU, Ronald Madnick is a supporter of the law.
Madnick says that even if there are a few kinks in the law....the advantages out weigh the disadvantages.










» add a comment
karen21550
Jan 26 2009, 6:10 pm
Captain Canada
Jan 20 2009, 2:53 pm
so people are stupid
Jan 18 2009, 6:12 am
so people are stupid
Jan 18 2009, 6:01 am
PoPo
Jan 16 2009, 3:48 pm
purlecalyxkid
Jan 9 2009, 10:44 pm
ALCHOHOL KILLS PEOPLE WHO DONT EVEN DRINK IT!TOBACCO TO,TIME TO WAKE UP USA LEGALIZE IT ALL THE ANTI WEED OLD PEOPLE ARE DYING OFF,SMOKE SOME PURPS!!!!
Unconcerned Citizen
Jan 8 2009, 1:03 am
Ponch
Jan 7 2009, 9:01 pm
Al
Jan 7 2009, 3:45 pm
dogman
Jan 7 2009, 11:45 am
Personal feelings or issues should not EVER come into play.
If the law is what it is, then leave well enough alone.
No more Lone Rangers.
How are these people kept in accordance with the law?
Do we as the people have to wait till election day to get our rights enforced?
My government continues to baffle me...
frediemerc
Jan 5 2009, 3:42 pm
NOR CAL WEED SMOKE
Jan 5 2009, 1:18 pm
BaKeD in WI
Jan 5 2009, 8:46 am
haha...to below, must be nice kali bro, to be able to blow, right in front of the popo,whoa
right on hu210
♥2allthestoners
*listening to 311*
StashZoo.com
Jan 4 2009, 5:51 pm
HU210
Jan 4 2009, 12:13 pm
By Toby Sterling
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (AP) - Amsterdam unveiled plans Saturday to close brothels, sex shops and marijuana cafes in its ancient city center as part of a major effort to drive organized crime out of the tourist haven.
The city is targeting businesses that "generate criminality," including gambling parlors, and the so-called "coffee shops" where marijuana is sold openly. Also targeted are peep shows, massage parlors and souvenir shops used by drug dealers for money-laundering.
"I think that the new reality will be more in line with our image as a tolerant and crazy place, rather than a free zone for criminals" said Lodewijk Asscher, a city council member and one of the main proponents of the plan.
The news comes just one day after Amsterdam's mayor said he would search for loopholes in new rules laid down by the national government that would close marijuana cafes near schools citywide. The measures announced Saturday would affect about 36 coffee shops in the center itself - a little less than 20 percent of the city total.
Asscher underlined that the city center will remain true to its freewheeling reputation.
"It'll be a place with 200 windows (for prostitutes) and 30 coffee shops, which you can't find anywhere else in the world - very exciting, but also with cultural attractions," he said. "And you won't have to be embarrassed to say you came."
Under the plan announced Saturday, Amsterdam will spend euro30 million to euro40 million ($38 million to $51 million) to bring hotels, restaurants, art galleries and boutiques to the center. It will also build new underground parking areas.
Amsterdam already had plans to close many brothels and some coffee shops, but plans announced Saturday go further.
Asscher said the city would reshape the area, using zoning rules, buying out businesses and offering assistance to upgrade stores. The city has shut brothels and sex clubs in the past by relying on a law allowing the closure of businesses with bookkeeping irregularities.
Prostitution will be allowed only in two areas in the district - notably De Wallen ("The Walls"), a web of streets and alleys around the city's medieval retaining dam walls. The area has been a center of prostitution since before the city's golden shipping age in the 1600s.
Prostitution was legalized in the Netherlands in 2000, formalizing a long-standing tolerance policy.
Marijuana is technically illegal in the Netherlands, but prosecutors won't press charges for possession of small amounts. Coffee shops are able to sell it openly.
JD
Jan 4 2009, 11:38 am
Hats off to the voters in Mass.-finally! As for
police chiefs who now feel they don't have to enforce laws they don't like should be thrown in jail themselves. These a--holes are the reason our prisons are filled with non-violent pot smokers,should be their asses in there! So there mister PIG!
JD
Jan 4 2009, 11:33 am
Hats off to the voters in Mass.-finally! As for
police chiefs who now feel they don't have to enforce laws they don't like should be thrown in jail thmselves. These a--holes are the reason our prisons are filled with non-violent pot smokers,should be their asses in there! So there mister PIG!
HU210
Jan 4 2009, 8:58 am
Dec.18, 2008 in Anarchy, Big Government
The term Anarchy has been used since the French Revolution to describe a society with no government. This is the most basic definition of Anarchy. The word, however, is much misunderstood, as most individuals seem to equate it with violence and chaos. Real Anarchists (not the kind you see in movies, but the ones that exist in the real world) are actually opposed to violence and chaos. This, in fact, is where their resistance to the state actually stems from, as they believe that governments are amongst the worst perpetuators of violence, oppression, and chaos in the world.
One specific place that Anarchists often see fault in government is through their oppression of the people they rule over. In fact, the Declaration of Independence of the United States declares that, “…to secure these rights, government are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Anarchists, however, will argue that there is never true consent of the governed. In any form of government there will always be a percentage of the population, no matter how small, that disagrees with the actions of the government, and those individuals will always be oppressed.
Individualist Anarchists also believe in the absolute sovereignty of the individual. This means that every person should have complete and unlimited control over his or her own self. If a person wants to use a drug, they should be allowed to. If a person wants to speak their mind, then they should be allowed to. The individual is king over himself. Anarchists believe that any restraint on this sovereignty is evil, but if a government places that restraint, then it is an absolute evil. This is because governments can act under the veil of legitimacy. This line of thinking leads Anarchists to the conclusion that individualism and the state are utterly irreconcilable.
Anarchists also favor economic freedom meaning that the state should not have any influence in the economy. This is because they see political power and wealth as inseparable. When a government is formed, much of the countries wealth is funneled to the political elite and their direct supporters and influences. Anarchists believe that when there is a state apparatus in place a majority of the people, likely the middle-class and lower-class, are exploited. There is also a minority of people that both exploit and are exploited. There is, however, one class of people that are the rich political elites that do nothing but exploit the rest of the population. The elite status and the wealth were obtained through politics and the government, which therefore makes the state evil in their inherent oppression of the majority of the population.
Anarchists are not inherently violent individuals, despite their reputation, and they do not aim to bring chaos to the world. The end goal of Anarchism is the abolishment of the state, but supporters of the philosophy do not believe that this will lead to chaos. On the contrary, they believe that governments all over the world create violence, oppression, exploitation, and chaos everywhere they are formed. This, according to Anarchists, is achieved through wars, taxes, suppression of personal freedoms, suppression of economic freedoms, and many other immoral acts of the state. Therefore, a society without the influence of governing bodies that have a “legal monopoly over the use force,” as Anarcho-Capitalist Murray Rothbard puts it, could not have a worse outcome than what already exists
D27
Jan 3 2009, 12:38 pm
D27
Jan 3 2009, 12:32 pm
american citizen
Jan 3 2009, 7:23 am
mn 763
Jan 3 2009, 3:46 am
anonymous
Jan 3 2009, 1:28 am
grayfoxSS
Jan 3 2009, 1:25 am
hippystyle
Jan 3 2009, 12:36 am
» add a comment