Snort Coke, Shaft the Environment
Sat, May 10, 2008 10:27 am
Source: thergister.com
Snorting cocaine is an environmental crime whatever your views on drug use, scientists declared last week.
A panel of scientists meeting at the Natural History Museum in London last week detailed how the production of the drug and its trafficking affect biodiversity and contribute to climate change.
The production of a gram of cocaine means the destruction of four square metres of Colombian forest, they said, raising the question of which supermodels, popstars and city types should be lined up with hummer drivers and big game hunters in the environmental most-wanted stakes.
Colombia is one of the most biodiverse countries in the planet, and also the biggest cocaine producer. Bad combination.
Cocaine production is a threat to environment is all its stages, said Liliana Davalos, lecturer in Molecular Ecology at the Open University, UK. The first step of the cycle is the destruction of forest to plant coca. Every year, 100 thousand hectares of Colombian forest is destroyed for this end. The plantations also use tons of herbicides that are forbidden in many other countries. Since the UK is one of the world’s largest consumption markets for cocaine, it makes concerns about organic tomatoes and pesticides seem futile.
Then, the coca leaves must be soaked in solvents to release their psychotropic substances. Every year, 20 million litres of acetone, 13 million litres of gasoline and 81 thousand litres of sulphuric acid are used in this process and then thrown away, untreated, in rivers and water streams.
Transporting the product demands the clearing of more forests for landing strips, preferably in national parks and conservation areas. "These areas belong to the Government, so no owner can be held liable for the illegal activities," Davalos points out.
Finally, the Colombian government's efforts to eradicate the plantations only serve to exacerbate the situation. They use planes to spray herbicides over coca plantations, with predictably gruesome consequences for insects, amphibians and other plants in the area. Growers then move to other areas, clear the native vegetation and start all over again.
For those who are convinced of the huge impact of their stimulant consumption and want to change for a milder and more ethical one, massive doses of caffeine are the way to go.
Coffee from shade trees cultivation farms, where the bushes are grown in the shadow of native taller trees, is a much more eco-friendly option. "Biodiversity in these plantations is almost as high as in primary forests," said botanist Sandy Knapp from the Natural History Museum.
So, the geek classic stimulant is eco-friendly, while the yuppie classic is a no no.







» add a comment
GamePlayer
May 11 2008, 5:53 pm
http://game3.mafiadeath.com/r/9745.php
anonymous
May 11 2008, 2:12 pm
anonymous
May 11 2008, 2:10 pm
This article also mention all of the herbicides the US government dumps on the coca plants as part of Plan Columbia.
Not that I give a rat's ass about the elitist disco dust anyway. I'd rather smoke a phatty.
umm
May 11 2008, 1:13 pm
Ben Dover
May 10 2008, 6:52 pm
RE: yeah
May 10 2008, 6:41 pm
I think we would all be really surprised at how many people actually use cocaine with the laws as they are (many more 'closet' users than pot, I think).
I don't think overall usage would change much, but a lot more people would be more open about their usage for sure.
Yeah
May 10 2008, 6:19 pm
I think Marijuana useage would decrease with decriminalization, but I also think Coke useage would increase if it were legal.
Just my 2 cents...
Incognito
May 10 2008, 5:01 pm
HEMP4LIFE!!!
May 10 2008, 12:59 pm
OUTDOOR ORGANIX FTW
Slater
May 10 2008, 11:29 am
Though I dont like to hear about my Earth being destroyed.
But hell, when your doing a line out of the eightball you just bought, I bet your not thinking about our rivers and forest being destroyed, haha.
Japan gives off more waste then the poor country of Columbia, in fact, we should leave those people (Columbians) alone, their just trying to make money, who can blame them.
» add a comment