The 22nd HIGH TIMES Cannabis Cup

Celebrate the most amazing year in modern marijuana history at the 22nd Annual HIGH TIMES Cannabis …

Mon Jul 27, 2009 more videos 20

sponsored links
high times presents

Next President Might Be Gentler on Pot Clubs

Mon, May 12, 2008 11:08 am


Source: sfgate.com

 

Ever since California voters became the first in the nation to legalize medical marijuana in 1996, the state has faced unyielding opposition from the federal government, which insists it has the power to prohibit a drug it considers useless and dangerous.

 

That could all change with the next presidential election.

 

As the candidates prepare for a May 20 primary in Oregon, one of 12 states with a California-style law, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois has become an increasingly firm advocate of ending federal intervention and letting states make their own rules when it comes to medical marijuana.

 

His Democratic rival, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, is less explicit, recently softening a pledge she made early in the campaign to halt federal raids in states with medical marijuana laws. But she has expressed none of the hostility that marked the response of her husband's administration to California's initiative, Proposition 215.

 

Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the Republican nominee-in-waiting, has gone back and forth on the issue - promising a medical marijuana patient at one campaign stop that seriously ill patients would never face arrest under a McCain administration, but ultimately endorsing the Bush administration's policy of federal raids and prosecutions.

 

Political battles over exempting medical patients from marijuana laws have been fought mostly in statehouses and at ballot boxes since 1996, when California voters repealed state criminal penalties for those who used the drug with their doctor's approval. But the federal government has played an important role in limiting the scope of those state laws, and their effectiveness over the next four years may be determined by the next president.

 

Bill Clinton's position

President Bill Clinton's administration opposed the California law from the start and won a court case allowing it to shut nonprofit organizations that supplied medical marijuana to members. Clinton's Justice Department also tried to punish California doctors who recommended marijuana to their patients by revoking their authority to prescribe any drugs, but federal courts backed the doctors.

 

The Bush administration has gone further, raiding medical marijuana growers and clinics, prosecuting suppliers under federal drug laws after winning a U.S. Supreme Court case, and pressuring commercial property owners to evict marijuana dispensaries by threatening legal action. The administration has also blocked a University of Massachusetts researcher's attempt to grow marijuana for studies of its medical properties.

 

Since 2001, federal prosecutors have won convictions in at least 28 California drug cases where defendants claimed they were supplying or using medical marijuana, according to the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. Prosecutors have filed charges in 22 more cases, and authorities have raided 10 growers or dispensaries without filing charges, the group says.

 

The presidential candidates haven't discussed the issue in speeches or debates, but medical marijuana advocates regularly questioned them in Iowa and New Hampshire. The most sweeping changes were proposed by second-tier candidates - Democrats Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich and Chris Dodd and Republican Ron Paul called for repealing federal criminal penalties for marijuana - but of the remaining contenders, Obama has been the friendliest to advocates of medical marijuana.

 

At a November appearance in Audubon, Iowa, Obama recalled that his mother had died of cancer and said he saw no difference between doctor-prescribed morphine and marijuana as pain relievers. He said he would be open to allowing medical use of marijuana, if scientists and doctors concluded it was effective, but only under "strict guidelines," because he was "concerned about folks just kind of growing their own and saying it's for medicinal purposes."

 

Obama went a step further in an interview in March with the Mail Tribune newspaper in Medford, Ore. While still expressing qualms about patients growing their own supply or getting it from "mom-and-pop stores," he said it is "entirely appropriate" for a state to legalize the medical use of marijuana, "with the same controls as other drugs prescribed by doctors."

 

In response to recent questions from The Chronicle about medical marijuana, Obama's campaign - the only one of the three contenders to reply - endorsed a hands-off federal policy.

 

"Voters and legislators in the states - from California to Nevada to Maine - have decided to provide their residents suffering from chronic diseases and serious illnesses like AIDS and cancer with medical marijuana to relieve their pain and suffering," said campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt.

 

"Obama supports the rights of states and local governments to make this choice - though he believes medical marijuana should be subject to (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) regulation like other drugs," LaBolt said. He said the FDA should consider how marijuana is regulated under federal law, while leaving states free to chart their own course.

 

Obama would end DEA raids

LaBolt also said Obama would end U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration raids on medical marijuana suppliers in states with their own laws.

 

Those raids have been the focus of Hillary Clinton's comments on the issue. At a July campaign event in Manchester, N.H., she told a medical marijuana advocate that she would end the federal raids, according to Granite Staters for Medical Marijuana, which recorded the exchange.

 

But the candidate was less absolute in a more recent interview with the Willamette Week newspaper in Hillsboro, Ore.

 

"I don't think it's a good use of federal law enforcement resources to be going after people who are supplying marijuana for medicinal purposes," Clinton said in the April 5 interview. But when asked whether she would stop the raids, she replied, "What we should do is prioritize what the DEA should be doing, and that would not be a high priority. There's a lot of other, more important work that needs to be done."

 

Clinton has also said she opposes repealing criminal penalties for marijuana, but told advocates in October that the government should conduct more research "into what, if any, medical benefits it has."

 

McCain has taken a variety of positions, according to comments recorded by medical marijuana advocates.

 

At an April 2007 campaign kickoff event, when asked if he would end federal raids, he said, "I would let states decide that issue." But less than two months later, he said he would not end the raids. Then, in November, he promised a man who described himself as a seriously ill marijuana patient that he would "do everything in my power" to make sure the man was never arrested for using the drug.

 

No policy paper

While maintaining that medical experts considered marijuana ineffectual and potentially dangerous, McCain promised at the same November event in New Hampshire to consult with experts and issue an "in-depth policy paper" on the topic within a few days. McCain's campaign has not responded to media inquiries, and marijuana advocates say the policy paper was never issued.

 

He was also asked during a November conference call whether the federal government should override the will of the people in states with medical marijuana laws. "Medical marijuana is not something that the, quote, people want," McCain replied.

 

Bruce Mirken, a spokesman for the advocacy group Marijuana Policy Project, said he remains hopeful that the federal climate will improve, no matter who becomes president.

 

"All it takes," he said, "is for the Justice Department to say, 'Leave these states alone.' "

 

 

Green views: Environmentalists find John McCain inconsistent. A5

 

Online resources

Statements and videos of the presidential candidates can be viewed at a Web site maintained by a pro-medical marijuana group, the Marijuana Policy Project. The Web site is www.granitestaters.com/candidates.

 

The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws' list of federal medical marijuana cases in California is available at links.sfgate.com/ZDHH.



» add a comment

umm

May 19 2008, 4:25 pm

Interesting! I just looked up Cannabinoids on Wikipedia, and found there are 66 different Cannabinoids! Wow, I'm sure researchers have yet to discover which ones or combinations are effective for different medical conditions...

oops

May 19 2008, 4:16 pm

I meant that marinol can't ever be as effective a medication as CANNABIS.

umm

May 19 2008, 4:14 pm

I guess the teleprompter is still down, so they called the show off for the week. Oh well, I just watched show 449 again, it was informative, and good as usual. Tim pate showed how you can make wood boards from hemp, and one caller's question made me wish everyone knew the answer to. He asked why is it that the thc pill called marinol is not as medically effective as cannabis. The answer if because their are other cannabinoids other than thc that may not in themselves be psychoactive, they are still medically active. Marinol doesn't have cbn, thcv, cbc, and the others that take away pain, and make the body healthy. Marinol therefore can never be as effective a medication as thc.

Also, with the marinol pill, it is impossible to titrate the proper dose. This can lead to taking too much thc, and thus causing unpleasant side effects. Another problem with the pill marinol is that it takes a long time to take effect. The effects of Cannabis, on the other hand comes on much more quick, and is much easier to titrate, "you know when you've had enough".

umm

May 17 2008, 5:04 pm

Would someone please upload the latest installment of Cannabis Common Sense? show number is 450...Thanks...

umm

May 16 2008, 3:23 pm

No one needs a weapon. No one needs war. All we need is love, and Cannabis!

umm

May 16 2008, 3:20 pm

Hate is a terrible disease. The haters want all stoner's to live in a cesspool. A septic tank. A gigantic sewage complex in which runs the dregs, the filth, the misery laden slop of the race of men. His hatreds, his prejudices, his passions, and his violence. And the keeper of this sword? Man. He is a scientifically advanced monkeys who walks upright, and with eyes wide opened into an abyss of his own making. His bombs, his fallout, his poisons, his radioactivity, everything he designs as an art for dying, is his excuse for living. Do to the haters of Cannabis, we live in an exquisite bedlam in their prisons. An insanity. Maybe all the more grotesque by the fact that they don't recognize it as insanity.

Haters might ask: Did it ever occur to you that some of these scientifically advanced monkeys make bombs as a simple expedient for survival? That across this planet there are other scientifically advanced monkeys who would pulverize us into dust if they thought they could do so with impunity?

I don't need a lesson in current events
I'm pretty well up on the times.
So the freedom loving monkeys make bombs.
Well the aggressors make bombs.
Then ultimately somebody pushes a button
and just as ultimately this earth disappears
and all this I suppose is right and practicle and expedient -
a few germs will rise up out of the rubble
and wave microscopic flags of victory
and shed a few microscopic tears for the race of men
Are you content with this kind of status quo?
Are you satisfied with this kind of 20th century where innocent Cannabis users are persecuted, prosecuted and left to die?
Are you stupid enough to ever vote for another republican again?

me again,

May 16 2008, 1:14 am

well I don't feel like giving up trying to make this world a better place, even if others may have failed before me, I Will change this world, even if only a little. After all, if I/we don't, then who will? should we all just give up? or should we give it all we got to make the wrong things right... I've made my decision.

to below

May 15 2008, 1:21 pm

some of us have been attempting what you suggest probably longer than you've been alive . Your enthusiasm is noteable but time will make you wise .

somenamewhocares

May 13 2008, 2:48 pm

what's all this? people, you've got to stop acting like it's hopeless or immpossible to make weed legal again. also, if you assume every politicain is a complete liar you'll never vote again, and if you always turn to 3rd parties during close presidential races, you'll always be wasting your vote, and don't give me that "well if you'd just support ron paul anyway he might win..." that's BULLSHIT, everyone knows that Mcpain is the republican nominee. period. voting for him now is just helping the republicans win by one more vote, in a time where republicans are destroying america with bad policy we can't afford to waste any votes on "3rd parties", if you aren't voting for the democrat then you're letting the republicans win. period. and republicans Hate weed. period. In fact I'll go as far as saying republicans are flat wrong on every major issue, and I for one am not going to sit back and let them continue to fuck shit up for the rest of us, I'm going to vote. You all should too, or you have no right to complain about mccains crazy ideas if he gets in office, because you Could have helped stop him.

kinder

May 13 2008, 8:17 am

To Anonymous,
Why waist your vote?

Mature Adult

May 13 2008, 6:01 am

It'll never happen . Your special interest group can't match the other special interesr groups $$$$ .Like it or not , thats the bottom line . Just like anything else .

anonymous

May 12 2008, 8:30 pm

Aye.

I'd say that Ron Paul is the best man for the job... Only problem is that people won't wake up and actually realize he would change this nation for the better.

"Congressman Paul’s consistent voting record prompted one of his congressional colleagues to say, “Ron Paul personifies the Founding Fathers’ ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are.” Another colleague observed, “There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few.”"

That is what I want. Someone who will ACTUALLY do what they SAY they are going to do and stick to it.

I think that shit would hit the fan if we put Hillary into power. Now I'm not sexist, but she has some fucked up ideas. And when I watched her on tv say something about Iran and how they need to be scared of us.. It's like wtf, you don't go out and blatantly say things like that. That just pisses off a country and makes relations worse!

I want someone with EXPERIENCE.

Sadly Ron Paul may not have a chance because everyone says "I love his ideas and he would be a great president...But he doesn't stand a chance". I mean come on, I hear it with a lot of issues and if people would have the BACK BONE to stick to something a lot more would be done. The problem is that most people sway with what's popular and aren't true to themselves and/or country men.

But...If i had to choose between Hillary or Obama, I would definitely go for Obama (Although I'm voting Ron Paul :D )

Slater

May 12 2008, 7:31 pm

Right on Okla420, I completely agree.
This is how I know all Clinton supporters are fucking idiots. Im from Arkansas, so I know all about their shanagins from the 80's and 90's. Does everyone not remember how Bill and Hilliary where running a real estate scam and ripped the tax payers out of Hundreds of thousands. Or how about the 80 people who "Mysteriously" died who he didnt like.
And another thing jackass, you spelt BARACK.
Does no one remember how McCain was almost arrested for running scams against a federal bank.
Barack is the best choice because he is the least corrupt.

usedbongs.com

May 12 2008, 7:08 pm

'Might' just does nothing for me.

I bet every presidential candidate on the ticket has puffed.

When are they gonna do something?

okla420

May 12 2008, 6:42 pm

heh..wanted to add this.

My main point was is you can't really compare weed prohibtion to alcohol prhobition because alcohol use is by far, way way my widespread. You take away booze people will throw a fit.. take away weed?

It's all a numbers thing..

okla420

May 12 2008, 6:39 pm

To the guy a few posts down:

The thing is, like it or not, weed has and always will be a cultural stigma based on the fact that the hispanic and black working class were among the first ethnic groups to start using it. Given the prevelance of racism and prejudice back then, that label went on attached with weed into the 21'st century. Fast forward today, this attitude was somewhat diminished after the sixties exposed a lot of young people of all races to the drug culture. However, that wasn't every young person in the sixties and also I'm sure some of those young folks that grew up and had kids of their own feared the same behavior out of their own kids.

Unlike alcohol, which has been used since time out of mind by nearly every culture... weed has that deep seeded stigma with it and that's why it isn't just a matter of ending prohibition because people don't care.

420Viper

May 12 2008, 6:38 pm

I'm not holding my breath; unless I'm holding in a hit.

I'm with

May 12 2008, 5:49 pm

reality on this one .

Wet Willy

May 12 2008, 4:23 pm

to Slater: oh snap son! you tell em!

somenamewhocares

May 12 2008, 4:01 pm

The FDA is corrupt too! Don't leave it to them to handle the federal laws! I believe in my brain that hillary is smarter than barak, barak has good intentions but weakly formed plans, he relies on what others tell him, and as president i have a feeling they'll treat him like mushrooms, feed him shit and keep him in the dark, and without even realizing it he'll fuck it up, I bet the FDA will make it a federal offence to have pot in the wrong circumstance, meaning more pot smokers will lose the right to vote! It's already a fed thing if you grow too much or carry too much. If Barak wants to do this right he'll really have to clean house when he gets there, lots or dirty corrupt rats hangin' around in lots of departments, so if he wants it clean he has to get rid of all the bullshitters floating around washington, otherwise the whole place will stink. In short, obama will try, and I hope he gets it right, cause alot of rich big-wigs will be fighting to keep it illegal, and if his plan is flawed, it could set back the whole movement. Look before you leap, Obama! Look before you leap, but by all means do leap somewhere.

Slater

May 12 2008, 3:17 pm

I realy hope so too Kinder.

kinder

May 12 2008, 2:40 pm

Hello Slater:
I hope your wrong on this one.

Reality Check

May 12 2008, 1:48 pm

Next President M I G H T be gentler on pot clubs .
Might ? ..... another non story .

Slater

May 12 2008, 1:14 pm

Though im pro Obama,
I HIGHLY doubt he will do shit for Marijuana users.
Its just a bunch of lies all politicians spread in order to gain popularity. As soon as he takes office he will forget all about MMJ. Look forward to another 70years of prohibition everybody. And you know why? Because know one realy gives a shit, not even stoners, because if you all gave a shit, prohibition would have ended 10years after it became illegal just like Alcohol.

» add a comment

search

hightimes.com 420.com

sponsored links
seed center
headshop
HIGH TIMES headshop

HIGH TIMES PRESENTS: JORGE CERVANTES ULTIMATE GROW DVD

Now, for the first time the world's ultimate ganja guide brings his expertise to this instructional DVD - taking you step-by-step from seeds and clones to harvest in the high style.

Jorge Cervantes has sold over 500,000 copies of his Indoor Marijuana Horticulture book and now that bible will be televised. Filmed on location in Vancouver, BC this new 90-minute DVD teaches you everything you need to know about growing your own pot.

more headsop products

The Latest At Norml