Legislators Aim to Snuff Out Penalties for Pot Use
Wed, Jul 30, 2008 1:48 pm
Source: cnn.com
(CNN) -- The U.S. should stop arresting responsible marijuana users, Rep. Barney Frank said Wednesday, announcing a proposal to end federal penalties for Americans carrying fewer than 100 grams, almost a quarter-pound, of the substance.
Current laws targeting marijuana users place undue burdens on law enforcement resources, punish ill Americans whose doctors have prescribed the substance and unfairly affect African-Americans, said Frank, flanked by legislators and representatives from advocacy groups.
"The vast amount of human activity ought to be none of the government's business," Frank said during a Capitol Hill news conference. "I don't think it is the government's business to tell you how to spend your leisure time."
The Massachusetts Democrat and his supporters emphasized that only the use -- and not the abuse -- of marijuana would be decriminalized if the resolution passes.
Watch Frank lay out the proposal »
The Drug Enforcement Administration says people charged with simple possession are rarely incarcerated. The agency and the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy have long opposed marijuana legalization, for medical purposes or otherwise.
Marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance, meaning it has a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use, according to the ONDCP.
"Smoked marijuana has not withstood the rigors of science -- it is not medicine and it is not safe," the DEA states on its Web site. "Legalization of marijuana, no matter how it begins, will come at the expense of our children and public safety. It will create dependency and treatment issues, and open the door to use of other drugs, impaired health, delinquent behavior, and drugged drivers."
Allen St. Pierre, spokesman for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), likened Frank's proposal -- co-sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas -- to current laws dealing with alcohol consumption. Alcohol use is permitted, and the government focuses its law enforcement efforts on those who abuse alcohol or drive under its influence, he said.
"We do not arrest and jail responsible alcohol drinkers," he said.
St. Pierre said there are tens of millions of marijuana smokers in the United States, including himself, and hundreds of thousands are arrested each year for medical or personal use. iReport.com: Is it time to legalize pot?
There have been 20 million marijuana-related arrests since 1965, he said, and 11 million since 1990, and "every 38 seconds, a marijuana smoker is arrested."
Rob Kampia, director of the Marijuana Policy Project, said marijuana arrests outnumber arrests for "all violent crimes combined," meaning that police are spending inordinate amounts of time chasing nonviolent criminals.
"Ending arrests is the key to marijuana policy reform," he said.
Reps. William Lacy Clay, D-Missouri, and Barbara Lee, D-California, said that in addition to targeting nonviolent offenders, U.S. marijuana laws also unfairly target African-Americans.
Clay said he did not condone drug use, but he opposes using tax dollars to pursue what he feels is an arcane holdover from "a phony war on drugs that is filling up our prisons, especially with people of color."
Too many drug enforcement resources are being dedicated to incarcerating nonviolent drugs users, and not enough is being done to stop the trafficking of narcotics into the United States, he said.
Being arrested is not the American marijuana smoker's only concern, said Bill Piper of the Drug Policy Alliance Network. Those found guilty of marijuana use can lose their jobs, financial aid for college, their food stamp and welfare benefits, or their low-cost housing.
The U.S. stance on marijuana, Piper said, "is one of the most destructive criminal justice policies in America today."
Calling the U.S. policy "inhumane" and "immoral," Lee said she has many constituents who are harassed or arrested for using or cultivating marijuana for medical purposes. California allows medical marijuana use, but the federal government does not, she explained.
House Resolution 5843, titled the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2008, would allow "a very small number of individuals" suffering from chronic pain or illness to smoke marijuana with impunity.
According to NORML, marijuana can be used to treat a range of illnesses, including glaucoma, asthma, multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS and seizures.
Frank, who is chairman of the Financial Services Committee, said about a dozen states already have approved some degree of medical marijuana use, and the federal government should stop devoting resources to arresting people who are complying with their states' laws.
In a shot at Republicans, Frank said it was strange that those who support limited government want to criminalize marijuana.
Asked if the resolution's passage would change his personal behavior, Frank quipped, "I do obey every law I vote for," but quickly said he did not use marijuana, nor does he encourage it.
"I smoke cigars. I don't think other people should do that. If young people ask me, I would advise them not to do it," he said.
If HR 5843 were passed by the House, marijuana smokers could possess up to 100 grams -- about 3½ ounces -- of cannabis without being arrested. It would also permit the "nonprofit transfer" of up to an ounce of marijuana.
The resolution would not affect laws forbidding growing, importing or exporting marijuana, or selling it for profit. The resolution also would not affect any state laws regarding marijuana use.






» add a comment
channel 5 news chicago
Nov 2 2008, 6:03 pm
bridesmaid gift unique
Oct 23 2008, 1:42 am
dress game girl online play up
Oct 22 2008, 8:29 am
TIBURON_NOIR
Oct 18 2008, 12:15 am
1. Charge for a liscense to grow, and or sell..
2. Tax to buy the same way that we do for tobaco or liquar.
The only problem is that anyone can grow it anywhere, so it will be harder for the government to control it, but those are the people who should be fined or imprisoned. In about 10 years no one will remember the days of feeling guilty for hittin a bowl or smoking a blunt. Other countries have done it and everyone knows that AMERICA is so fucked that we dont even realize that our laws is what makes us look so bad. This plant is the most used of all the illegal drugs but is safer than tobaco, or alcahol. no one gets weed poisening like alcahol. and real bud doesnt have all the added shit wich an everyday ciggaret has. the government is talkin all this shit about being broke and owing money. than take a page from a broke student and flip what little money you have to pay rent re-up and bank the rest. DO YOU REALIZE HOW MUCH MONEY THE GOVERNMENT CAN MAKE OFF THIS IN JUST 5 YEARS. THINK ABOUT IT.
By saving the money from nonviolent drug ofenders in prison. plus the revinue. the money is enless. plus people would be alot more chill if we can walk down the street without wondering if anyone knows what im doing when i smoke.
mooo mooo
Sep 30 2008, 9:47 am
HU210
Aug 31 2008, 6:39 pm
Mearly killing the supply does not qwell demand.
2daWest
Aug 12 2008, 3:54 pm
ViroGenX
Aug 11 2008, 8:26 am
quickj
Aug 6 2008, 11:38 am
I also believe that pot is a gateway drug, but I believe that it is so because of the way we must attain pot. If you didn't have to go to the dealer, perhaps the temptation to experiment with other drugs he has wouldn't be so great. I have personally gone looking for pot and ended up with something completely different due to availability. Another reason I believe pot is a gateway drug is due to the big deal people make about it. When I was say 13-21, if you told me not to do something, the more I wanted to do it. I believe an open attitude and education is the key to curing all drug addiction.
Wondering
Aug 6 2008, 1:13 am
no name
Aug 4 2008, 12:52 am
umm
Aug 3 2008, 12:01 pm
mrheadies420
Aug 3 2008, 2:21 am
umm
Aug 2 2008, 7:07 pm
And no name, I agree that if anyone commits a crime while being on a substance, that the person should definately go to jail.
They certainly can't blame anyone else for them being a jerk.
hey umm
Aug 2 2008, 6:29 pm
Matt
Aug 2 2008, 2:32 pm
no name
Aug 2 2008, 1:21 pm
(Intelligent only)
so you honestly think that people who try hard drugs will learn from it. for few thats the case but not all people have that streagth some dont learn. . thank you for thinking for 5 mins or more before responding and being rastional about it(only 3 people). forgive the spelling im high and lovin it but i agree with extent locking up a hard user is not good at all. give treatment try to help. on the other hand lock up a user who commits crime on the substance stick it to them lock them up. being intoxicated is no excuse for stupidity. and yes i belive in rights but not stupidity.
hey umm
Aug 2 2008, 12:29 pm
umm
Aug 2 2008, 10:53 am
Hey umm/no name
Aug 2 2008, 5:33 am
HU210
Aug 1 2008, 11:05 pm
Call your congresscritter at (202)225-2911, and tell them to co-sponcer HR5843. And get er done before the next election in November.
Or no vote for you or anyone in your party!!
anonymous
Aug 1 2008, 4:03 pm
umm
Aug 1 2008, 11:08 am
How is it that my success is considered a try by you?
Success to means that I succeeded. A try to me means that although I tried, I didn't succeed. Nice try to smear my fine history, but it just doesn't fly here.
You are now dismissed.
♥
hey umm
Aug 1 2008, 3:48 am
umm
Jul 31 2008, 11:50 pm
That said, I am personaly satisfied with Cannabis and Cannabis only. But that is just me. I'm sure that others may feel different in they're choices. Yes. I guess turning narc is probably not good in any circumstance.
♥
HU210
Jul 31 2008, 11:16 pm
No snitching for me!!!
What a repulsive suggestion, no name.
HU210
Jul 31 2008, 11:03 pm
Drug use is one of the many steps some individuals go through. Some people use them to learn new ways to tap the powers of the subconcious,after the techniques are learned, they discontinue the use of drugs and move on to more natural ways of expanding awareness. Others moderately use drugs in certian social settings or when listening to music or watching TV. Although some people wreck their lives through drug abuse, must we also destroy the lives of individuals who are going through a necessary step in their development? It is a crime to interfere with someones personal development. It is even a greater crime to wreck his life by imprisoning him, and practically ruining his chances for a successful career.
It has been proven through history that individuals learn from their own experiences, than they learn from government edicts. If a drug has harmful effects, allowing unrestricted use will expose them faster, thereby discouraging people from using it. Anti-Drug legislation prevents this from happening.
umm
Jul 31 2008, 9:24 pm
As for responding to an email though. I'd rather retain my anonymity, but I wish I could, but you just never know who and where the haters are, and the warmongers do believe that all is fair in love and their war.
♥
Cherokee Fred
Jul 31 2008, 8:10 pm
?
Jul 31 2008, 7:52 pm
.
Jul 31 2008, 7:09 pm
no name
Jul 31 2008, 7:07 pm
i just don't think it ever will. i hope it does. I personally dislike being shunned for one simple harmless action besides
theirs more than just one substance to pick on. with pot legal
they can focus more on the hard stuff such as heroin, co can, psp, etc. So i ask why pick on the little man. do they even realize the support they would get from pot smokers if this is ever passed it is up to us as one group to protect our
pot to keep this non prohibit law in action (if it or ever passes) in other words they give us a little we should give them a little back.
information can be bought at any price a language they know very well and have great practice on. so i ask all of you even H.T personnel this question. Are you willing to give up all the information regarding the other drugs the harder drugs all of it for the legalization of pot. the reason i ask this i for those individuals that do more than just pot.
for those who believe in legalization of all drugs. I for one do not aproove of anything legal but pot and I'm more than willing to give up all information regarding harder drugs by that i mean place of purchase, that labs to make it, the names that sell it. just to have the freedom
the privilege given to us us god to smoke my herb without the fear of prosecution from our officials, and persecution from my family and people in general. so will you do the same
to free yourself from the chains i speak of, or will you continue to ride the middle calming all drugs should be legalized. I'm here to tell you the idea of all drugs being legal is a ideal mistake even the great Barry cooper claims. Its time for us for you the individual reader, a high times operator sponsoring this site, the politician that supports, even Barry cooper, must now stand as one to make the ultimate decision to change the tide of our political fight we must pick a side, the side of legalization of marijuana, or the side that wishes prohibition of marijuana. because there is no middle hard drugs side. hard drugs will never be legal again it was a mistake back then
and its a mistake now we must realize this as one. we can offer information regarding hard drugs as a chip to bargen with and let them know that the harder drugs is as much as our enemy's as it is their enemy's also. perhaps then their def ears will open to our voices.
In Nutshell way to put it. Of all drugs witch one would you like to legalize? but you can only choose one
if you wish to respond to this post in privite my e mail is
Drafeted@hotmail.com
P.S please understand I'm only posting my ideals just like
all of you so don't hate iv done the homework read the statistics and studied the effects and explored the political stand on the matter. this is the idea that became of all the research. understand I'm a very strong supporter of Marijuana and any legalization form of it. but know this I STRONGLY oppose any other harder drugs. Except on alcohol and weed of course.
Thank you for reading
no name
Jul 31 2008, 7:03 pm
i just don't think it ever will. i hope it does. I personally dislike being shunned for one simple harmless action besides
theirs more than just one substance to pick on. with pot legal
they can focus more on the hard stuff such as heroin, co can, psp, etc. So i ask why pick on the little man. do they even realize the support they would get from pot smokers if this is ever passed it is up to us as one group to protect our
pot to keep this non prohibit law in action (if it or ever passes) in other words they give us a little we should give them a little back.
information can be bought at any price a language they know very well and have great practice on. so i ask all of you even H.T personnel this question. Are you willing to give up all the information regarding the other drugs the harder drugs all of it for the legalization of pot. the reason i ask this i for those individuals that do more than just pot.
for those who believe in legalization of all drugs. I for one do not aproove of anything legal but pot and I'm more than willing to give up all information regarding harder drugs by that i mean place of purchase, that labs to make it, the names that sell it. just to have the freedom
the privilege given to us us god to smoke my herb without the fear of prosecution from our officials, and persecution from my family and people in general. so will you do the same
to free yourself from the chains i speak of, or will you continue to ride the middle calming all drugs should be legalized. I'm here to tell you the idea of all drugs being legal is a ideal mistake even the great Barry cooper claims. Its time for us for you the individual reader, a high times operator sponsoring this site, the politician that supports, even Barry cooper, must now stand as one to make the ultimate decision to change the tide of our political fight we must pick a side, the side of legalization of marijuana, or the side that wishes prohibition of marijuana. because there is no middle hard drugs side. hard drugs will never be legal again it was a mistake back then
and its a mistake now we must realize this as one. we can offer information regarding hard drugs as a chip to bargen with and let them know that the harder drugs is as much as our enemy's as it is their enemy's also. perhaps then their def ears will open to our voices.
In Nutshell way to put it. Of all drugs witch one would you like to legalize? but you can only choose one
if you wish to respond to this post in privite my e mail is
Drafeted@hotmail.com
P.S please understand I'm only posting my ideals just like
all of you so don't hate iv done the homework read the statistics and studied the effects and explored the political stand on the matter. this is the idea that became of all the research. understand I'm a very strong supporter of Marijuana and any legalization form of it. but know this I STRONGLY oppose any other harder drugs. Except on alcohol and weed of course.
Thank you for reading
HU210
Jul 31 2008, 5:38 pm
Government holds patents on MMJ
Cannabinoids as antioxidants and nerotransmitters
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507.html
http://blog.norml.org/2008/07/03/us.government-patents-medical-pot/
Check the hypocracy
HU210
Jul 31 2008, 5:25 pm
Rep. Barney Frank
Jul 31 2008, 5:03 pm
You guys ain't reading enough .
Fat Dave
Jul 31 2008, 1:23 pm
Justice served? doubt it.
noneya
Jul 31 2008, 12:45 pm
TropicalBrainForest
Jul 31 2008, 12:22 pm
I don't see how Republicans can figure out a way not to be on the side of legalization. I mean isn't that everything they stand for? Putting the PEOPLE in control of their own lives, health care options, and use of their HARD EARNED MONEY!
Either way, the beauty of how this country works is that we have the right to go out and vote for politicians who represent our values. And whether the current politicians like it or not, America is wising up to the lies, spin, and all around bad wrap that marijuana has gotten. Our day will come.
Potted Meat
Jul 31 2008, 12:16 pm
right enough
Jul 31 2008, 12:13 pm
spam
Jul 31 2008, 12:03 pm
%%
Jul 31 2008, 11:39 am
##
Jul 31 2008, 11:12 am
Guppy
Jul 31 2008, 10:56 am
They got that covered .
tom buckreis
Jul 31 2008, 10:50 am
Shark
Jul 31 2008, 9:23 am
RAS1177
Jul 31 2008, 8:18 am
umm
Jul 31 2008, 1:39 am
I imagine that if the government continues with their blind intolerant violence against inocent citizens, that the people will continue to just leave this country. The big corporations have done the same thing, but for different reasons. Serves the government right. Who will clean the government's dust bins then?
The government would be much better recieved if they practiced a tolerant, and kind demeanor. Love is powerfull, yet love is seen as weak, and not effective by the diseased warmongers who long only for intollerance, and bloodshed.
My deepest love goes to the enlightened imbibers.
♥
umm
Jul 31 2008, 1:24 am
herbs
Jul 31 2008, 1:17 am
head for life
Jul 31 2008, 1:06 am
what?
Jul 31 2008, 1:01 am
pot head forever
Jul 30 2008, 11:42 pm
Al
Jul 30 2008, 10:02 pm
azure dream
Jul 30 2008, 9:44 pm
RY
Jul 30 2008, 8:55 pm
purplecalyxkid
Jul 30 2008, 7:58 pm
Webbhead
Jul 30 2008, 7:43 pm
we didn't drive going 80 plus down the expressway or running red lights while talking on the telephone or stare someone down because of the car they were driving or the clothes they were wearing - all we did was cruise down the road going a little under the speed limit, signaling with our turn signal, coming to complete stops and feeling good.
We didn't sit around our houses not working and expecting a hand out from the man or breaking into peoples homes so that we could get another fix. We got up and went to work everyday without worrying about having to take a drug test.
What has this country come to that they can't logically look at a simple herb, a simple plant that doesn't kill you, doesn't force you to take other drugs, doesn't lead you down the path of destruction, doesn't intice you to go do harm to your neighbors and make it out to be the plague that money does to people? The moral majority likes to look at weed and preach about the state of America, but can't send their kids out to play because some sicko is going to pick them up and kidnap them, kill them, molest them - but do you ever hear of a "cool" reasponsible hard working herb conniseur doing that? Cigarettes are killers to tens of thousands of people a year, not to mention the pollution of millions of cigarette butts being thrown out, stepped on and flicked onto dry grass starting fires in the red zones and yet that's okay? If it's illegal to litter how come smokers including cops aren't getting pulled over and being harrassed and ticketed and fined and put in jail?
Why? Because it's deemed too little - too much trouble - which is what should be thought about that joint in your pocket. I can make Billions of dollars doing heavy handing deals, lying and stealing, but I judge a hippie or a doctor who just wants to come home from work and take a few tokes -where's the justice in that? Weed and Hemp are like Beer and non-alcoholic beer. You could almost entirely isolated if you just had hemp but still couldn't get a buzz. Let the farmers and the American Indians start growing hemp to help with this country getting green and I don't me richer.
blindandfaded
Jul 30 2008, 7:43 pm
dankdevil
Jul 30 2008, 6:57 pm
Tristin
Jul 30 2008, 6:15 pm
jb
Jul 30 2008, 6:03 pm
I don't mean to point out the obvious here, but we are in quite a jam as a country these days. No matter what the effect of marijuana is or what your opinion may be about other people's usage, it sure isn't slowing down. The bottom line is that it does have multiple positive purposes, and it can generate quite a bit of much needed revenue, in addition to creating a massive, untapped market that will provide jobs, taxes, free up police resources, etc. Legalization will help us get out of this recession (which, i might add is largely due to our president's indulgence in legal murder, or "war").
I am tired of being a victim of another losing war, whether it be the "war on drugs" or the "war on terror". To me, it seems that we as a people are being terrorized, and that the real war is against us. God knows there's a war on our constitution. Doesn't anybody remember that when this country was founded, it's most valuable principle was simple, everyday freedom? We're taking it anyway, like it or not. The propaganda doesn't work anymore. To be considered a criminal because the use of a flower is an insult, a waste of time, and it is yet another mistake made by the leaders who are responsible for the negative situation we find ourselves in as a country today.
Time to rectify this situation with common sense, plain and simple.
kokoshka
Jul 30 2008, 5:40 pm
jesus
Jul 30 2008, 4:37 pm
dankdevil
Jul 30 2008, 4:24 pm
Passout-Patient
Jul 30 2008, 4:24 pm
I really like this article, raps up everything i've been researching into a few pages... (and i have books...)
1) the VERY very last sentence: okay, well forbidding import/export/growing is okay... BUT why not (e/a)ffect any states current laws on use? such as "smoking marijuana within yourown house is okay"?
SmoknDragon from Okla.
Jul 30 2008, 4:14 pm
Reality Check
Jul 30 2008, 3:52 pm
legalize it cause its right
Jul 30 2008, 3:36 pm
"Cursed is the ground for your sake; In toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life.
Both thorns and thistles is shall bring forth for you, and you shall eat the herb of the field.
Genesis 3 17&18
Read it before you talk about it, Atheist. I got no problem with you being Atheist but trying to inaccurately use the Bible to condone smoking weed is just plain stupid. We should legalize because it's just the right thing to do.
Al
Jul 30 2008, 3:25 pm
SparkyGump
Jul 30 2008, 3:14 pm
Michael Halpin, Jr. Raymond, WA
Jul 30 2008, 3:12 pm
SparkyGump
Jul 30 2008, 3:08 pm
Dissapointed Founding Father
Jul 30 2008, 3:06 pm
Study biology and science, politicians, then you will understand that the most amazing and natural systems are out of control and autonomous, the more you try to directly control something the more you fuck it up.
PS That legalbuds add always makes me consider buying legalbuds for a split second because of that cuuuute buds girl, haha.
Mamma Mia.
Jul 30 2008, 2:56 pm
God Himself.
Jul 30 2008, 2:31 pm
Chris42069
Jul 30 2008, 2:28 pm
Al
Jul 30 2008, 2:23 pm
Chris
Jul 30 2008, 2:17 pm
tjac
Jul 30 2008, 2:14 pm
Dante
Jul 30 2008, 2:11 pm
Mixed bag in my mind but since it doesn't make any sense, lawmakers are probably going to be more inclined to go along with it.
Yeah.
Jul 30 2008, 2:09 pm
JohnMccain.
Jul 30 2008, 2:05 pm
grapeape
Jul 30 2008, 2:03 pm
» add a comment