Fingerprint Test Shows Not Only Who but What
Thu, Aug 07, 2008 3:45 pm
Source: nytimes.com
With a new analytical technique, a fingerprint can now reveal much more than the identity of a person. It can now also identify what the person has been touching — drugs, explosives or poisons, for example.
Writing in Friday’s issue of the journal Science, R. Graham Cooks, a professor of chemistry at Purdue University, and his colleagues describe how a laboratory technique known as mass spectrometry could find a wider application in crime investigations.
The equipment to perform such tests is already commercially available, although expensive. Smaller, cheaper, portable versions are probably only a couple of years away.
In mass spectrometry, an electrical charge is added to a molecule, which is then accelerated by an electric field. The molecule enters a magnetic field, causing its trajectory to bend. The amount of bending tells the molecule’s mass-to-electric charge ratio. That is usually enough information to deduce what molecule it is.
In Dr. Cooks’ method, a tiny spray of electrically charged liquid – either water or water and alcohol – is sprayed on a tiny bit of the fingerprint. The droplets dissolve compounds in the fingerprints and splashes them off the surface into the analyzer. The liquid evaporates, and the electrical charge is transferred to the fingerprint molecules, which are then identified through mass spectrometry.
“It’s just that simple,” Dr. Cooks said. The researchers call the technique desorption electrospray ionization, or Desi, for short.
In the experiments described in the Science paper, solutions containing tiny amounts of various chemicals including cocaine and the explosive RDX were applied to the fingertips of volunteers. The volunteers touched surfaces like glass, paper and plastic. The researchers then analyzed the fingerprints.
Because the spatial resolution is on the order of the width of a human hair, the Desi technique did not just detect the presence of, for instance, cocaine on the surface, but literally showed a pattern of cocaine in the shape of the fingerprint, leaving no doubt who had left the cocaine behind.
Prosolia, Inc., a small company in Indianapolis, has licensed the Desi technology from Purdue and is already selling such analyzers as add-ons to large laboratory mass spectrometers, which cost several hundred thousand dollars each.
Prosolia has so far sold “40 or so” of its analyzers, said Peter T. Kissinger, the company’s chairman and chief executive. The most sophisticated version that would be needed for the fingerprint analysis went on sale only this year.
The fingerprint work “is a nice, quick dramatic indication of what the possibilities are,” Dr. Kissinger said.
However, fingerprints are not its main focus for Prosolia or Dr. Cooks. “This is really just an offshoot of a project that is really aimed at trying to develop a methodology ultimately to be used in surgery.” Dr. Cooks said.
If a Desi analyzer can be miniaturized and automated into a surgical tool, a surgeon could, for example, quickly test for the presence of molecules associated with cancer. “That’s the long-term aim of this work,” Dr. Cooks said.
In unpublished research, the researchers have tested the method with bladder tumors in dogs.
Prosolia is collaborating with Griffin Analytical Technologies, a subsidiary of ICx collaboraties, on a Desi analyzer that works with a portable mass spectrometer. That product is probably a year or two away from mark, Dr. Kissinger said.
As it becomes cheaper and more widely available, the Desi technology has potential ethical implications, Dr. Cooks said. Instead of drug tests, a company could surreptitiously check for illegal drug use of its employees by analyzing computer keyboards after the employees have gone home, for instance.
“It’s just one more test,” Dr. Cooks said, “and it can reveal a whole lot of detail.”










» add a comment
HU210
Oct 31 2008, 3:27 pm
--Bill Hicks
Happy Haloween! Lick this spot (:
Indi
Aug 8 2008, 6:02 pm
no name
Aug 8 2008, 3:29 pm
american citizen
Aug 8 2008, 8:49 am
HU210
Aug 7 2008, 10:39 pm
I like to treat the enemy of freedom ruthlessly if need be.
Without my pen, I am left with only my sword.I'm real good with sword.
Reason or Force, that the enemy decides.
umm
Aug 7 2008, 9:45 pm
Reminds me of another great commentator of the hightimes forum who said:
Note the language used in the prohibitionist type of claims. In their articles they usually state "can cause". Can, could, and might, are only assumptions. They dont state "does and will". You get the point. This article is called propaganda.
umm
Aug 7 2008, 9:22 pm
HU210
Aug 7 2008, 9:22 pm
When the Absolute Moralist declares an activity a crime he usually has the force of the government behind him, or soon will. Durring the reign of the Nazis, Jews wetre considered criminals. Before the civil war, escaped slaves were considered outlaws. After the Russian Revolution of 1917, communists exterminated opponents by the thousands. Prohibition turned buyers and sellers of alcohol into crimminals. Now buyers and sellers of drugs are labled as such.
Isin't it strange , activities that were once considered crimes are now legal? Groups of people who were labled crimminals and outcasts of "society" are now respectable citizens. Could it be true they were never crimminals and no crimes took place? Could this be true of the drug business?
First you have to distinguish the difference between voluntary and involuntary exchange. You must realize it is individuals who are involved in exchanges. In any two party exchange, one sells(gives) and one buys(recevives). "Society" can not take part in exchange; only individuals can.
A voluntary exchange takes place when two or more individuals agree to deal with one another, each participates of their own free will. The exchange could involve anything from giving and receviving love to buying and selling real estate. All involved believe they will benifit from the exchange.
An involuntary exchange takes place when at least one party to the transaction is in it against their will(examples of this type of exchange are robbery, rape assult and murder). Only this type of exchange can be considered crimminal.
Any use of goods coming form an involuntary exchange is a crime, provided the consumer knows they were acquired in that way.
The Anti-drug crusader considers marijuana smoking a crime.
The marijuana user commits a henious crime against himself, but worse yet he fails to turn himself in. Now the police, not knowing where this poor victim is, must start searching for him. Soon the mighty vice squad comes to the rescue. The victim is found. Lo and behold,they make another remarkable discovery, the criminal has also been located. Justice is finally served and the viscious criminal is hauled off to jail. But wait a minute! What happened to the victim? He is in jail, victimized again. In this case the "victim" and the so-called criminal are the same. Obviously somethimg is wrong. The answer is evident. This is not an involuntary exchange; no crime has been comitted, a grave injustice is being done to the drug user.
Those who belive government should decide what crime is , could be happy in Russia,China, or any other communist country. They are probably nostalgic for the good old days of Nazi Germany.
(Russia no longer Communist)
umm
Aug 7 2008, 9:02 pm
umm
Aug 7 2008, 8:49 pm
HU210
Aug 7 2008, 8:29 pm
Plus I use Congresscritter.
LOL
Aug 7 2008, 8:10 pm
HU210
Aug 7 2008, 7:40 pm
420Viper
Aug 7 2008, 6:51 pm
It's not just fingerprints either. The lawbots can come in and Q-Tip the furniture and walls of your house and detect any residue.
Hopefully these machines will be cheap enough so that stoners can use them.
Keep washing until you're "clean".
anonymous
Aug 7 2008, 6:16 pm
bigjerm
Aug 7 2008, 6:03 pm
HU210
Aug 7 2008, 5:37 pm
Get these bums out of your life now.
» add a comment