McCain's Double Standard: Hawk In The Drug War, Yet His Wife Got No Penalty
Wed, Sep 03, 2008 11:42 am
Source: commondreams.org
Much has been made of allegations of possible youthful use of illegal drugs by Republican presidential candidate George W. Bush. Meanwhile, his chief GOP opponent, Arizona Sen. John McCain, has admitted that his wife not only illegally used drugs but walked away from criminal charges. The McCains have worked to make Cindy McCain's addiction into a political asset--despite the fact that she stole the drugs from a charity she directed and used them while mothering four young children.
In 1994, Mrs. McCain admitted that she had solicited prescriptions for painkillers from physicians who worked for an international charity that she founded, the American Voluntary Medical Team. She then filled the prescriptions in the names of her staff.
There are two ways to react to this behavior. According to the Betty Ford model, people can sympathetically respond to the oppressed and ignored wife of a busy politician who has bravely come forward to admit her overpowering addiction. Mrs. McCain took this posture when she first tearfully confessed her addiction. She and her husband repeated this performance in October on the NBC program "Dateline."
The other possible public reaction is one of anger. Americans are prosecuted every day for such drug use. While most drug abusers purchase their drugs from street dealers, Mrs. McCain used her status as a charity director and senator's wife to cajole the drugs she wanted.
In fact, Mrs. McCain was investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration after the agency was approached by a former staff member of her charity. The investigation resulted in no charges or prison time for her, and she entered a diversion program. While these records were not made public at the time, Mrs. McCain eventually confessed her drug use when she learned that a reporter was investigating the story.
Is Mrs. McCain to be judged as a pitiable victim or as a criminal felon? This debate is at the heart of the discussion of American drug policy. Should we deal with illicit drug users as victims or as criminals?
Let's examine Mrs. McCain's position in these terms. She was the privileged wife of a prominent family and spouse of an important politician, a person who had her own position of prestige and power. Should she not be held at least as accountable for her actions as an uneducated inner-city drug user? After all, she could enter drug treatment at any time she chose, unlike many drug users who find themselves in prison.
Moreover, Mrs. McCain was violating a position of trust by stealing from a charitable organization, using its money and medical expertise to fuel her drug use. Is this not morally more reprehensible than simply purchasing drugs illegally?
Finally, Mrs. McCain was the mother of four children at the time she admits to using drugs--between 1989 and 1992. Her children were born in 1984, 1986, 1988 and 1991. In other words, Cindy McCain was using drugs while raising small children, one of whom she adopted while she was an addict. In most states, family services will remove children from a woman who is known to be an active drug addict, and she would certainly not be allowed to adopt a child while addicted.
John McCain is a hawk in the drug war. He advocates stricter drug laws, penalties and enforcement against drug sellers. He has had nothing to say about redressing our punitive approach toward drug users. Of course, McCain also supports family values. Yet if John and Cindy McCain were not well-off and influential, they might not have a family at all. McCain's lack of concern for street drug users contrasts sharply with the support and understanding his wife received. It's the old American double standard. For "straight-shooter" McCain, charity begins at home--and ends there.










» add a comment
barbara
May 13 2009, 6:31 am
cognitive theory to addiction—and indeed, to behavior in general—which
holds human beings regulate and control their own environmental and
cognitive environments, and are not merely driven by internal, driving
impulses. Additionally, homosexual content is not implicated as a
necessary feature in addiction.
Barbara
Alaska Drug Rehab Centers and Programs
Hey ID Boy
Nov 1 2008, 8:02 am
ps: .gov
about ".gov" sites
Oct 18 2008, 8:45 am
Hey ID Boy
Sep 23 2008, 8:24 pm
nice try
Sep 23 2008, 7:20 pm
ps
Sep 23 2008, 7:12 am
Hey ID boy
Sep 23 2008, 7:10 am
Snopes.com " we don't expect anyone to accept us as the ultimate authority on any topic " . I don't as instructed .
"and yet " you do . Interesting .........
Hint : I don't see any reference to any e-mail except from you .
Hint #2 : .gov
Sorry for stealing your thunder , but it was only wind .
and yet,
Sep 22 2008, 6:33 pm
Hey ID boy
Sep 22 2008, 7:27 am
Snopes.com " We don't expect any one to accept us as the ultimate authority on any topic "
hint: .gov
to hey id boy
Sep 21 2008, 3:28 pm
and P.S.
Sep 21 2008, 2:45 pm
I don't spin
Sep 21 2008, 2:35 pm
these "facts" are word for word the contents of that questionable email, and this site talks about the FACTS of the matter, I'll let it do the explaining for me as they have done a fine job, if you can comprehend what it says, you'll find the answers to your questions here, and you will see that those "facts to ponder" are far from facts, but are exactly the type of spin I called them out for being. once again, that website to see is: http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/sschanges.asp
Hey ID Boy
Sep 20 2008, 11:37 pm
The problem here is , and I'm dead serious , you can't stand someone with an opinion or facts that contradict what you FEEL is the correct position . And it seems to me (i think )your conclusions about what the facts mean is the culprit . You're to biased , plain and simple . You (i think ) are not capable of coming to any fair conclusions as a result . Heres an example for you to spin :
This poster ( facts to ponder) made reference to historically correct data , easily accessable and true beyond any shadow of a doubt AND can not be denied . No wiggle room , no if ands or buts , no interpretation required ,nothing to speculate about and nothing to spin .
You CAN"T make the same claim . Argueing what you THINK the facts represent or what you were TOLD the facts represent concerning the other political party has no bearing on the posters ( facts to ponder) statement . His /Her statement about speculation and conjecture was right on the money .
Now , what part of that did you not get ?
to hey ID boy
Sep 20 2008, 6:40 pm
Hey ID boy
Sep 20 2008, 4:22 pm
Careful who you jump on next time , they may have teeth , but we both know you lack the ability to control your urges . So , till next time ..........................
nice to see selective hearing 2
Sep 20 2008, 1:13 pm
Hey ID boy
Sep 20 2008, 7:51 am
Your opening line makes an assertion that some assumptions have been made . Lets see ......
"Obama and Biden have plans " ... ok , what are they ?
"most likely opening up funds to help SS out of danger " .. most likely ? you're assuming here.
"maybe finishing up that whole Iraq experiment" ..maybe ? you're assuming here .
"maybe if hemp was legal " .. again with "maybe" ?
"Democrats are far more likely " ..likely ? thats an assumption .
I see why your post was desribed as conjecture and speculation . I'm sure you will be rewarded for helping your party against such an aggressive older person .
Perhaps you would like to argue the merits of hand spun chitt'lins versus stump wupped ?
oversimplification
Sep 19 2008, 10:26 pm
Facts to Ponder
Sep 19 2008, 9:11 am
I have looked into what you have stated and find your comments is based on speculation and conjecture .
The principles of CAUSE & EFFECT come into play here and does not support your position . IF your position was accurate the question is still a matter of who caused these funds to be in a position to be spent for something other than social security . The undeniable facts were presented in my original post . It was the Democrats . That is a fact that can not be denied with any amount of spin or hype . I realize this is an incovenient truth but it is a matter of public record . Sorry.
Hey ID boy
Sep 19 2008, 5:40 am
"Nice selective memory"
"stop trying to distract people "
"I laugh at you ".. all this to somebody who was minding there own business .
"is that your name now " ? ... is that YOUR name now ?
is that your name now?
Sep 18 2008, 8:03 pm
Hey ID boy
Sep 18 2008, 11:40 am
I laugh at you
Sep 18 2008, 10:22 am
ps
Sep 18 2008, 6:19 am
Facts to ponder
Sep 18 2008, 6:14 am
To me any many of the age , it is an imortant FACT ! And you will have to consider it one day . (retirement IF you live that long ) . I understand you don't like it , neither do I . Take your blinders off .
nice selective memory there
Sep 17 2008, 8:55 pm
Facts to ponder
Sep 17 2008, 3:46 pm
a) participation in the program would be completely voluntary .
b) the participants would only pay 1% of the first 1,400.00 annually .
As we all know , this didn't turn out to be the case .
In 1958 , the Democratically controlled congress voted to move the SS funds into the general fund for Congress to spend . They felt the large amount of money in the SS fund would not run out . It didn't fly . President at the time ? Dwight Eisenhower ( a Republican )
How did those funds end up being moved into the general fund for congress to spend ? Lyndon B. Johnson ( a democrat) and the Democratically controlled house and senate pushed it through .
Which political party statred taxing social security annuities ...Al Gore ( a Democrat) under Bill Clintons (a democrat) watchful eye .
Immigrants moving into the country , and at the age of 65 , were paid social security benefits although they had not put a single dime into the program . Who was behind that little jewel ? The Democratic party under Jimmy Carter ( a Democrat).
Now , Social Security is in danger of running out of the funds its supposed to have leaving future retirees to fend for them selfs as opposed to what was promised .
These are factual statistics and can be accessed by anyone WANTING to be educated on the matter .
Who does this affect .......everyone eventually .......
HU210
Sep 15 2008, 10:35 pm
HU210
Sep 15 2008, 10:32 pm
What is the difference between a Cathloic priest and acne?
Acne waits until you are 13 before it comes on your face.
I thought they were all doin coke to stay awake long enough to listen to all of that boring religious babble. Does cocaine go good with wine?
Sorry Guys
Sep 15 2008, 10:33 am
How do you control large populations ? Let them think they are running things . Its been that way since the dawn of THIS civilization anyway .....
about alaska and such
Sep 11 2008, 9:52 pm
HU210
Sep 11 2008, 6:09 pm
Further When Clinton Stated "I tried it once, but I didn't inhale"
Millions thought that this is our guy and elected Clinton.
The general consensus at the time was- at least he had it up to his lips. We will get it legalized under Clinton.
Clinton Elected.
These are the only democrats other than Kennedy to be president in my lifetime. I was a baby durring Kennedy, but have read that he favored marijuana= Elected.
Forgive me if I dont grasp your point.
Obama had better grasp this as well or we will have McInsane as our next president.
Perhaps McInsane already has this covered, since cannabis is decriminalized in his VP's state of Alaska.
noone's op, to hu
Sep 10 2008, 8:44 pm
dex
Sep 10 2008, 7:37 pm
sorry... I keep on finding these semi relevant issues and don't have any specific place to post them, so I pick the best headline I can find that is still active. Anyway, this link has to do with fox news reporting on "Killer Marijuana".
Is there a page on High Times that is an open forum?
dex
Sep 10 2008, 6:22 pm
http://www.popeater.com/movies/article/matt-damon-slams-sarah-palin-video/168998?icid=100214839x1209389864x1200502816
HU210
Sep 10 2008, 6:11 pm
This discussion started with you claiming that people voting 3 party cost the Demos an election or 2.
Which I have demonstrated is incorrect.
Your responce about Clintion Locking more people up, possibly not a result of direct action by him. Merits examination.
Do you recall him giving us 100,000 more cops?
Nor did he do anything to turn back Bush #1's anti-drug tyrrnay.
In fact Clinton was playing the appoligist on that very point when the issue came to light on the campaign trail with Hillary last March. Worth noting here. That is also when Hillary started sliding in the polls, never to recover.
Did you also note Obama start to lose traction after he voted to approve FISA?
Had he been smart. He would have said " I voted against FISA, as I dont understand the logic of how giving up our rights will make us safer. If that were true. Then wouldnt giving up all of our rights make us completely safe?"
He could also SAFELY take a pro weed stance simply by learning the facts about weed and reciting them when challenged. After making a monkey out of his opponet time after time on the issue. It would be clear sailing all the way to the President office for him.
That would be real change.
As I have stated a number of times. I dont care what party they are in. If they are in favor of cannabis liberty. I am on their side!
PS Spare me the -there are larger issues mantra,thanks
HU210
Sep 10 2008, 5:35 pm
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/CollegeAndFamily/RaiseKids/WhatIfWeLegalizedAllDrugs.aspx?page=1
SMOKNDRAGON
Sep 10 2008, 4:27 pm
Hey Smoky
Sep 10 2008, 10:41 am
McCain is just to old and I'm not sure Palin can step in if needed but time will tell . Obama has Biden to handle the real stuff so , this could be an interesting election .
SmoknDragon
Sep 10 2008, 12:17 am
ok, I hear ya
Sep 9 2008, 7:37 pm
hey smoky dragon
Sep 9 2008, 6:59 am
HU210
Sep 9 2008, 6:49 am
I did not state that I vote 3rd party or not at all.
Let me clairify it for you.
Many who vote 3rd party would not have voted at all had the 3rd party not appealed to their values. As for myself. I will write in my own name rather than not vote.
I just wont subscribe to the corperate whores that smile and shake your hand then promise every thing and deliver more of the same BS when elected.
If you want change, you wont find it betting on the favorite ponies. They can only hear $$$.
Had you been paying attention. You would have caught the stories of voting irregularites in Florida and Ohio.
Seems it wasnt the voters having a problem. But those counting the votes causing the problem for Gore and Kerry.
Time for work.
rekt0ne
Sep 9 2008, 6:48 am
never say never
Sep 9 2008, 12:42 am
SmoknDragon
Sep 8 2008, 9:24 pm
me again
Sep 8 2008, 8:03 pm
HU210
Sep 8 2008, 6:51 pm
That said. You are wrong about "people like me" who vote 3rd party costing Gore or Kerry the election.
First you assume that those who voted 3rd party in those elections would have voted anyway absent 3rd party candidates.
Second you assume that absent the 3rd party candidate to vote for. That all 3rd party voters would automaticly vote democrat.
That is a real reach, not to mention short sighted. But its your story.
If Gore or Kerry and now Obama Would open the tent to let drug users in. They might beat the Republicans in 08.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it!!
X,,to Dale
Sep 7 2008, 10:18 pm
to hu210
Sep 7 2008, 9:39 pm
Dale, to X:
Sep 7 2008, 8:09 pm
to below
Sep 7 2008, 4:59 pm
HU210
Sep 7 2008, 4:49 pm
Nearly 60 percent of those sentenced to federal prison durring the Clinton administration are serving time for drug offences.
The total number of people in federal prison on drug charges--63,448--is 62 percent more that in 1990.
http//sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/2/19/MN118967.DTL
I hope that the media starts to question pit bull Palin about weed being legal in Alaska!!
That would bring everyones position to the surface-eh?
HU210
Sep 7 2008, 4:22 pm
To reward those who have actually done somthing to repeal the cannabis laws with our votes. Regardless of party affiliation. I support those who walk their talk.
In a close election -as this one may turn out to be- the losing side will and should examine why the little guy held on to the millions of votes against their machine(s) Why did millions of people reject us and choose to write in_______.
Thus opening their tent to genuine new ideas next election.
X
Sep 7 2008, 1:44 pm
Sarah
Sep 7 2008, 11:33 am
anonymous
Sep 7 2008, 11:24 am
Please repug expain to me why Emery and Chong got nailed and when. Also under Clinton a person could still buy seeds and glasswear without fear. Now its like being baited.
jnos45
Sep 7 2008, 2:21 am
HU210
Sep 6 2008, 7:04 pm
Rush and Cindy sitting in a tree. Eating pain killers, instead of smoking weed.
How did Mrs. Mcinsane break her wrist. I missed that news clip.
Did I mention that today marks 20 years since Judge Youngs Ruling in DEA RULING 86-22.
Probably the most interesting 68 pages (double spaced) of reading on cannabis, ever written, in my opnion.
Take some time and read it. I am certian that you will be compelled to send NORML a contribution for that work.
I spoke with Jon Gettman(NORML Director at the time) at the Great MJ Harvest Fest in Madison a few weeks after the ruling was rendered.
He had asked Judge about the language and reasoning used in the ruling. The wise Judge replied,"It's time to stop claiming that the earth is flat where marijuana is concerned" That is close to verbatem. Its been 20 years.
umm
Sep 6 2008, 1:37 pm
He has all the qualifications to make decisions with ease. He's always to his job on-time, so he is dependable. His profesion is profesional toker, so what more would you want?
Vote today! :)
♥
rasta
Sep 6 2008, 1:27 pm
rasta
Sep 6 2008, 1:23 pm
WHAT ???
Sep 6 2008, 9:20 am
.... just like every other politician regardless of the party ?... surely not ! The next thing you know he'll be running for something ! Go figure ......
fred
Sep 6 2008, 4:59 am
Mr politican
Sep 5 2008, 11:01 pm
Mr Politican
P.S
Fuck you little people
P.s.s
Thanks for the vote and the nice job suckers!!
HaHAHa
what
Sep 5 2008, 10:36 pm
someone
Sep 5 2008, 9:33 pm
Dale
Sep 5 2008, 8:44 pm
HU210
Sep 5 2008, 8:35 pm
Seems no one mentions Obamas vote in favor of the FISA bill. You know. The one that gives immunity to telecommunications companys when they cooperate with Uncle Scams spying on everyones phone,internet,etc., allegedly looking for terrorists.
Some example of change there!
look again
Sep 5 2008, 5:56 pm
Obama
Sep 5 2008, 4:49 pm
The more time that passes , the less there is to know .
SARAH PALIN
Sep 5 2008, 2:33 pm
B-Snyce
Sep 5 2008, 1:14 pm
I usually look at all the issues and pick the lesser of the 2 evils. There will not likely ever be a candidate that you will agree with on all of the issues. I would love to see pot at least de-criminalized, but there are much more important things at stake in this election.
I agree that Ron Paul is awesome. He is not a real republican, he's a libertarian. I don't think that writing him in is a good idea. A write in candidate will never win the presidency. Writing in a candidate is basically the same as not voting at all.
As far as legalizing, I think it would be a better situation if we kept selling illegal and allowed people to grow their own and make not-for-profit transfers or trades. If they legalize it outright, the government will regulate potency and tax the hell out of it.
HU210
Sep 5 2008, 6:40 am
Because cops, prison gaurds, are union members. Union members vote Democrat.
HU210
Sep 5 2008, 6:17 am
Note: There is a clearer article in the SF Gate. Will find later.
Study: Prisons filled at record pace in Clinton years
WASHINGTON (AP) — More Americans went to prison or jail during the Clinton administration than during any past administration, the result of get-tough policies that led to more prisons, more police officers and longer sentences, a criminal justice think tank reports.
During President Clinton's eight years in office, 673,000 people were sent to state and federal prisons and jails, compared with 343,000 during President Bush's single term and 448,000 in President Reagan's two terms, says a study by the Justice Policy Institute, an arm of The Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice.
The center advocates more balance between incarceration and treatment for criminals.
The incarceration rate at the end of the Clinton administration was 476 per 100,000 citizens, versus 332 per 100,000 at the end of Bush's term and 247 per 100,000 at the end of Reagan's administration, the study said.
Incarceration rates for blacks increased to 3,620 per 100,000 from around 3,000 per 100,000 people during Clinton's two terms.
Two million people are behind bars and 4.5 million are on probation and parole, according to the study, which is based on Justice Department figures and estimates from 1993 to 2000.
The study blamed the surge in prisoners on Clinton administration initiatives that provided more money to states for prisons, police officers and crime prevention programs. The 1994 crime bill, which gave $30 billion to states, was a major factor, said Vincent Schiraldi, president of the Justice Policy Institute. Other factors included tougher sentencing and the abolition of parole, he said.
Republicans are thought to have more punitive crime policies than Democrats, but the opposite was true during the Clinton administration, Schiraldi said.
"President Clinton stole the show from the 'tough on crime' Republicans," he said.
Allen Beck, chief of corrections statistics at the Bureau of Justice Statistics, disputed the notion that Clinton administration crime initiatives were the prime reason for the burgeoning prison population.
He said many states had already begun tough crime prevention programs before Clinton came to office and tougher sentencing guidelines for federal drug offenders began in the late 1980s.
Moreover, Beck said, people are staying in jail longer because parole boards are not releasing prisoners.
"It's not that more people are going to prison, rather people in prison are staying longer," he said.
Schiraldi urged President Bush to make good on a campaign promise to provide $1 billion to states for local drug treatment programs.
During the campaign, Bush said the surge in the number of prisoners in recent years "is a necessary and effective role of government — protecting our communities from predators." He advocated using charities and religious-based groups to help the children of prisoners and providing money for a pilot prison ministries program.
HU210
Sep 5 2008, 5:56 am
Reject the BS. Write in Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich or your own name.
These two bums( McSame-Obummer) wont do anything positive for the cannabis consumer.
Yes, I have heard the BS that they cant get elected if they take a stand in favor of weed.
However, I can remember when Clinton said that he "didnt inhale". People jumped on his band wagon. I can recall many saying. He is our guy. At least he has had the stuff to his lips. He will do somthing for us if he is elected.
He did. He jailed more than Raygun or BitchBush#1!
Then when elected. The -there are bigger problems than weed- to deal with mantra,was recited ad nauseum.
Same thing is going on here with Obuma. People think that he is weed friendly because he smoked some in his youth. Forgetting that he also has said that it was a mistake.
Implying that it is a mistake for everyone else also.
Go ahead, vote for one of these whores. Forget that neither one has introduced, co-sponcered or voted in favor of weed.
Four years from now we will still be here bitching and doing nothing to help ourselves.
Ron Paul Has introduced and co-sponcered bills favoring weed.
Food for thought.
Obama is a liar
Sep 5 2008, 4:52 am
To the poster below : I'm sure you could have turned it off ?
mccain is a Liar
Sep 5 2008, 2:16 am
Dale
Sep 4 2008, 6:58 pm
HU210
Sep 4 2008, 5:16 pm
The excerpt below is from DEA Ruling 86-22
Sorry about that.
nutcase
Sep 4 2008, 4:37 pm
US Citizen
Sep 4 2008, 4:10 pm
Poof
Sep 4 2008, 2:26 pm
umm
Sep 4 2008, 1:38 pm
Good point, kind patron of the forum:)
♥
So...
Sep 4 2008, 12:44 pm
umm
Sep 4 2008, 12:06 pm
♥
umm
Sep 4 2008, 1:34 am
Dale
Sep 4 2008, 1:23 am
Dale
Sep 4 2008, 1:16 am
HU210
Sep 3 2008, 9:50 pm
8. A healthy, athletic young woman named Valerie Cover was
stricken with multiple sclerosis while in her early twenties. She
consulted several medical specialists and followed all the customary
regimens and prescribed methods for coping with this debilitating disease
over a period of several years. None of these proved availing. Two
years after first experiencing the symptoms of multiple sclerosis her
active, productive life - as an athlete, Navy officer's wife and mother -
was effectively over. The Social Security Administration declared her
totally disabled. To move about her home she had to sit on a skateboard
and push herself around. She spent most of her time in bed or sitting in
a wheelchair.
9. An occasional marijuana smoker in her teens, before her
marriage, she had not smoked it for five years as of February 1986. Then
a neighbor suggested that marijuana just might help Mrs. Cover's multiple
sclerosis, having read that it had helped cancer patient's control their
emesis. Mrs. Cover acceded to the suggestion.
10. Just before smoking the marijuana cigarette produced by her
neighbor, Mrs. Cover had been throwing up and suffering from spasms.
Within five minutes of smoking part of the marijuana cigarette she
stopped vomiting, no longer felt nauseous and noticed that the intensity
of her spasms was significantly reduced. She stood up unaided.
11. Mrs. Cover began smoking marijuana whenever she felt
nauseated. When she did so it controlled her vomiting, stopped the
nausea and increased her
- 42 -
appetite. It helped ease and control her spasticity. Her limbs were
much easier to control. After three months of smoking marijuana she
could walk unassisted, had regained all of her lost weight, her seizures
became almost nonexistent. She could again care for her children. She
could drive an automobile again. She regained the ability to lead a
normal life.
12. Concerned that her use of this illegal substance might
jeopardize the career of her Navy officer husband, Mrs. Cover stopped
smoking marijuana several times. Each time she did so, after about a
month, she had retrogressed to the point that her multiple sclerosis
again had her confined to bed and wheelchair or skateboard. As of the
Spring of 1987 Mrs. Cover had resumed smoking marijuana regularly on an
"as needed" basis. Her multiple sclerosis symptoms are under excellent
control. She has obtained a full-time job. She still needs a wheelchair
on rare occasions, but generally has full use of her limbs and can walk
around with relative ease.
13. Mrs. Cover's doctor has accepted the effectiveness of
marijuana in her case. He questioned her closely about her use of it,
telling her that it is the most effective drug known in reducing
vomiting...
20 years now have passed come Sept. 6 2008, and our government criminals still deny the sick and ill.
What are you going to do this election year?
Sit on your ass getting high?
Support real change. Join NORML today!!
Join NORML today!!
umm
Sep 3 2008, 9:18 pm
umm
Sep 3 2008, 9:12 pm
umm
Sep 3 2008, 9:08 pm
So, I am not studying politics, cause I am not going to waist my time. Politics are nothing but lies created by the rich, to keep the rich people rolling in their cash. Politics are an insult to intelligence. Look what lies the political leaders say, and tell me other wise. Look how all the medical groups say Marijuana is safer than water, and can stop cancer in our bodies, yet the prohibitionist political parties want to continue a war on innocent people. Its appalling. Well, gotta toke...♥
Bluesmoke
Sep 3 2008, 7:23 pm
His wife is a scumbag...and his willingness to tolerate 4 years of a painkiller addiction in his wife, and try to hide it from the public says way too much about his (lack of) character. He and his wife can both rot in HELL!
PLEASE...Someone in authority at HT or the original source...PLEASE get this to the mainstream media... Once and for all let the public see what McCain is REALLY all about!
Bluesmoke
Sep 3 2008, 7:18 pm
His wife is a scumbag, and for the first time ev erin my posts I'll utter one word of profanity. They can both rot in HELL!
PLEASE...Someone in authority at HT or the original source...PLEASE get this to the mainstream media and let the public know what McCain is REALLY all about.
PoliceOfficer
Sep 3 2008, 7:13 pm
I guess that means I haveta vote for Obama.
hmmm
Sep 3 2008, 6:55 pm
But don't any of you criminals think that you can get away with it!!!! Damn sick IMO.
dj to umm
Sep 3 2008, 5:30 pm
setin it str8
Sep 3 2008, 5:05 pm
umm
Sep 3 2008, 4:52 pm
umm
Sep 3 2008, 2:08 pm
the mcains are not fit to lead anyway, cause they want to take away the medical need for cannabis by those who need it the most.
Don't forget to educate everyone you know about jury nullification.
pete
Sep 3 2008, 2:05 pm
420Viper
Sep 3 2008, 1:41 pm
Another example of hypocritical politicians.
If your states ballot has a write-in line for President, write in RON PAUL, R-TX.
Weedom Writer
Sep 3 2008, 12:31 pm
» add a comment