The 22nd HIGH TIMES Cannabis Cup

Celebrate the most amazing year in modern marijuana history at the 22nd Annual HIGH TIMES Cannabis …

Mon Jul 27, 2009 more videos 20

sponsored links
high times presents

Pot Law Could Snuff Out Testing Policy

Thu, Dec 25, 2008 11:25 am


Source: news.bostonherald.com

 

A voter-approved law reducing possession of small amounts of marijuana to a civil offense threatens to unravel drug testing of police and other public employees, the Herald has learned.

 

The law, which goes into effect Jan. 2, prohibits government agencies and authorities from enforcing any punishment for pot possession with a fine greater than $100, according to the Massachusetts Police Chiefs Association, and defines possession so broadly as to include traces of pot in blood to urine to hair and fingernails.

 

“This very much threatens to undermine our ability to do the drug testing we do,” said Jack Collins, an attorney for the Massachusetts Police Chiefs Association.

 

Collins is calling for police departments to stop drug testing certain employees until the Legislature can explicitly allow public employees who fail drug tests to be punished. Without swift action, police departments and other agencies face lawsuits from unions protecting their members, Collins said.

 

“At this point, it looks like a violation of their rights, and then there’d be a lawsuit and it would cost thousands of dollars,” he warned.

 

Berkshire District Attorney David Capeless predicted the new law has far-reaching consequences for even school bus drivers and MBTA train operators, who could point to the law and say they can only be fined, not fired, for marijuana offenses.

 

“People given the critical job of looking after children or the general public, there’s a greater risk now they could be high,” Capeless warned.

 

Concerns about the viability of punishing people for flunking drug tests follow news reports of drug use by public workers. The Herald found that 77 MBTA employees have failed substance-abuse tests over the past three years.

 

A task force set up by Public Safety Secretary Kevin Burke is examining the implications of the new law and how it will be enforced. Burke’s office is expected to provide answers to questions of drug testing by year’s end.

 

Meanwhile, the Boston Police Department plans to continue drug testing regardless of any uncertainty, said Elaine Driscoll. “Enforcing our drug policies is non-negotiable,” Driscoll said.



» add a comment

Grown Adult

Jan 13 2009, 7:19 am

NOPE ! As long as their are occupations that require absolute sobriety and stringent attention to detail and safety , drug testing will ALWAYS be around . Its called the real world ..have some .

#1

Dec 31 2008, 3:37 pm

you know what kokoshka it dont take no two weeks it depends on (i dont meen this offensivley)it depends on how big you are if you have a lot of fatty cells than it sits unless you do alot and swet it sits in your fatty cells see me i got an advantage i am a small dude so when i smoke its out of my system in 72 hours!

gstlab3

Dec 29 2008, 10:48 pm

I CAN NOT BELIEVE THAT THESE ARE GROWN ADULTS., THAT ARE RUNNING THIS COUNTRY., IT IS AS BAD AS BUNCH OF SPOILED RICH BRATS>< WHO CRY FOUL EVERY TIME THAT THINGS ARE NOT PERFECT! WELL., TO BAD !! YOU ALL SHOULD SUFFER A BIT OF LIFES HARDSHIPS AND THEN I MIGHT CONSIDER SOMEONE FOR A PUBLIC OFFICE.,ALL THE ONES I CAN SEE ARE EITHER SPOILED BRATS AND BULLIES OR THEY ARE ON THE TAKE FOR THE HIGHEST BIDDER., THE POWER IS STILL OURS IF WE USE IT TO SMASH THE OPPRESSIVE GOVERNMENT WE NOW HAVE WE MIGHT SEE MORE COMMON SENSE AMONGST THE POLITICAL MACHINERY THAT STRANGLES US NOW WITH BURDONSOME LAWS AND PRISONS FULL OF A LOT OF PISSED OFF PEOPLE THAT ALL THEY WANTED WAS A LITTLE CASH AND A LOT OF "DO YOU WANT TO GET HIGH!?" THE PROBLEM IS PEOPLE ARE IGNORANT OF THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE AND TO BE RESPONSIBLE AND CAREFULL ABOUT THESE PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES! DO NOT BE TO CAREFULL AND KEEP YOUR SHIT A SECRET!!!DUH!!!!! FUCK A BUNCH OF STUPID LAWS AND PAYING TAXES TO A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE WORTHY OF THE LATE AL CAPONES GANG BACK IN THE GLORY DAYS OF ALCOHOL PROHIBITION., FUCK THE LAW AND DO WHAT YOU NEED TO GROW THE WEED., PERIOD JUST DO IT MAN!!!!!

HU210

Dec 29 2008, 8:25 pm

http://hightimes.com/legal/mikeg_ht/4915


Read it !!

Mature Adult

Dec 29 2008, 6:04 am

Well , you certainly hyped that one out of the ball park .
Do you blame the weather man when the forcast says rain ?
You don't like all the facts , just the ones that make you feel good ? Ohhh poor thing , and after you tried so hard to sound intelligent .

Oh dear

Dec 28 2008, 10:00 am

So 2 comments below: It will raise insurance costs.......

If Hitler had only known that to passify a populatation and get them to hand over their rights, all he had to do was threaten their insurance rates, and introduce child worship to a nation.

That comment speaks to the level of sacrafice and discomfort our people are willing to go through to protect their rights: None, not even an insurance rate hike....Im pleased so many sacraficed to get us to this enlightened point in history.

yeah

Dec 26 2008, 2:36 pm

but if you are your own boss, then you don't have to worry

Puffer

Dec 26 2008, 5:56 am

If a condition of your employment is to be drug free and it agreed to by both employer and employee. Why should this ( change in the law) make any difference. The law protects it's citizens from prosecution for minor posession. But it does not speak to the hiring agreement between you and your employer. This is a case of individuals and agencies trying to undermind the intent of the new laws. They want to act like this change has far reaching implications. Lets complicate things.

Mature Adult

Dec 26 2008, 4:38 am

Drug testing also allows employers to get lower cost insurance . No drug testing , more pay out for insurance . Thats a costly burden that will eventually get in your pocket . Just some realism .
And weed is a CHOICE . So don't start celebrating just yet .

Ganja Blue

Dec 25 2008, 11:19 pm

Urine drug screens don't test for trace amounts of marijuana in urine. Instead they test for metabolites of THC. This story is about crybaby bureaucrats trying to undermine the will of the people of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

kokoshka

Dec 25 2008, 6:01 pm

Drug testing is such bullshit and unfairly targets marijuana users. I could be blowing lines off of a hookers ass every Friday night and still piss clean, but if I smoked a joint two weeks ago I would lose my job.
What I do to relax is not any of my employers business, as long as it doesn't affect my work.

dankbud42o

Dec 25 2008, 5:05 pm

I live in mass, i love that #2 passed. :)

That Guy

Dec 25 2008, 11:47 am

As long as they aren't high on the job. The employers would just act like they would if they were drunk on the job, but if the Boston police department keeps testing past drug use they'll probably be sued (As long as it's Marijuana they found was used)

haha

Dec 25 2008, 11:42 am

they shouldnt be able to deny me a job for having weed in my piss now.

» add a comment

search

hightimes.com 420.com

sponsored links
seed center
headshop
HIGH TIMES headshop

HIGH TIMES PRESENTS: JORGE CERVANTES ULTIMATE GROW DVD

Now, for the first time the world's ultimate ganja guide brings his expertise to this instructional DVD - taking you step-by-step from seeds and clones to harvest in the high style.

Jorge Cervantes has sold over 500,000 copies of his Indoor Marijuana Horticulture book and now that bible will be televised. Filmed on location in Vancouver, BC this new 90-minute DVD teaches you everything you need to know about growing your own pot.

more headsop products

The Latest At Norml