Taking the Pro-Pot Position
Fri, Mar 27, 2009 1:45 pm
Source: www.huffingtonpost.com
When Barack Obama was first elected, he immediately began his straight-to-the-people, end-run-around-the-press style of Q&A by encouraging people to ask questions at Change.gov. One's fellow citizens could then vote throughout Nov. and the first part of Dec. 2008 on their favorite questions, and Obama's people would answer the most popular. When the dust settled and the votes were counted, among the most popular was this question:
"Will you consider legalizing marijuana so that the government can regulate it, tax it, put age limits on it, and create millions of new jobs and create a billion dollar industry right here in the U.S.?"
The incoming Obama administration offered well-reasoned, thought-out answers to a whole host of questions, including controversial ones such as "Will you appoint a Special Prosecutor (ideally Patrick Fitzgerald) to independently investigate the gravest crimes of the Bush Administration, including torture and warrantless wiretapping?"
But when it came time to tackle the oh-so-controversial topic of marijuana legalization, the response was a mere one sentence: "President-elect Obama is not in favor of the legalization of marijuana."
No rationale, no justification. Just a blanket statement redolent of a parent smirking, "Because I said so."
Fast-forward to today's online town hall, and once again, marijuana legalization proved to be one of the most popular questions, with the most-approved-of pro-pot question being: "Should the U.S. legalize pot as a way to grow jobs and stimulate the economy?"
With all of his usual charisma and endearing jocularity, our president laughed off the question, stating "I don't know what this says about the online audience, but, no, I don't think that is a good strategy to grow the economy." The mewling sycophants in the East Room audience laughed and burst into applause.
Once again, the Obama administration has greeted this question with an out-and-out rejection, with no reasoning underlying their position. Let's ignore for a moment that Obama's answer, in and of itself, is deeply wrong and ill-informed; moving from zero taxes on weed to any taxes is obviously an increase in revenue, not to mention the shift of growing and supplying jobs from the black market to legitimacy, which means more revenue in income taxes and more jobs.
Now, couple this with the millions, if not billions, of dollars that would be saved without the government being responsible for the care and feeding of hundreds of thousands of nonviolent drug offenders. From 1965 through the election of Barack Obama, our government arrested 20 million people for possession of marijuana. That, folks, is a lot of stoners.
In 2006 alone -- the last year for which statistics are available -- 829,625 people were arrested on marijuana-related charges, according to the FBI's Uniform Crime Report. Of these, 89 percent were arrested for simple possession.
So, couple the tax revenues, both sales and income, with the savings involved in keeping potheads out on the streets instead of in the pen. Now, put that Everest-sized pile of cash aside for a moment and think about this: Who's losing money in the deal?
According to Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, fully 75 percent of Mexican drug cartels' cash comes from the sale of marijuana. Legalizing marijuana would, of course, take away that massive source of income for the cartels, just as ending prohibition cut bootlegging as a source of revenue for La Cosa Nostra.
Combining all of the above effects, the legalization of marijuana means billions of dollars saved or made, the creation of jobs and the curbing of violence along the Mexican border, which in turn means saving thousands of lives.
Barack Obama can certainly be against legalization, but he owes it to nonviolent drug offenders caught in the horror show that is the U.S. prison system, the families of innocent victims of the Mexican drug wars and economically bloodied U.S. taxpayers to explain why. Ganja may cause the giggles, but legalization shouldn't be a laughing matter. And it certainly shouldn't be treated as cavalierly as it has by the current administration, especially when it has been proven to be a popular issue every time Obama has tried to go straight to the people.











» add a comment
jackrabbit420
May 5 2009, 4:26 pm
D BO
Apr 23 2009, 3:23 pm
brokenbear
Apr 23 2009, 10:05 am
Gen. E. Hashed
Apr 13 2009, 7:43 am
VIVA REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
umm
Apr 8 2009, 5:56 pm
You'd be letting alot of important shit slide if you let people suffer in the nursing homes, and everywhere else, and in prison.
We shouldn't even be voting on our rights to freedom of choice. We should all be free. This IS the number one issue. Restoring our constitutional rights, and imprisoning those who wronged us. That's the only issue ya should focus on as a president. That and ending all wars. It is not the presidents job to go around and pick fights with our neighbors. If ya voted for someone only for their pot position regardless of their other plans, e.g. voting for paul. That would leave us completely war free, and happy and out of national debp, and all would be ok with the world. But no. YOu prohibitionists leave us all fucked exept for pot states that have pot laws protecting medical pot.
Legalize today mr president. Invoke your executive orders, and veto powers. Say no to prohibition! Prohibition alone is responsible for all wars in the first place. The narco trade has dc up in arms.
Priority
Apr 8 2009, 11:48 am
umm
Apr 4 2009, 10:50 am
Tells more about the NGO
umm
Apr 3 2009, 1:54 pm
Hard to respect scum like that.
umm
Apr 3 2009, 1:46 pm
Thinker
Apr 3 2009, 8:18 am
And he can only really do that in times of national crisis, like during wartime. Which I guess we technically have been in for several years now, but with a 2/3 majority Congress can override him anyway. It's important to have his support, but it's even more important to have theirs.
umm
Apr 2 2009, 6:11 pm
Thinker
Apr 2 2009, 3:51 pm
We should all be naturally free. Go read our Constitution...if it weren't for the wrong people misinterpreting it all the time, we'd be a lot better off.
HU210
Apr 1 2009, 12:28 pm
The 5 F's of cannabis legalization.
Legalize it for
Pharma,food,fibre,fuel and FUN!
Is that a bumper sticker or what?
Send the 5 F's to:
President Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
washington, D.C. 20500
umm to Thinker
Apr 1 2009, 10:28 am
Freedom should never be voted on. We should all naturaly be free. This is the usa you know. Or have you forgotten?
abaddon
Apr 1 2009, 9:20 am
HU210
Apr 1 2009, 8:31 am
It didnt happen then. Worth noting the country was in a financial wreck much as it today. Then we got Regan and progress went backward at least 20 years. Obama aint saying anything close to what Carter said. So excuse me for not having any confidence in " it's comming" or words to that affect.
Do parties just happen,or do you make them happen?
Keep the fire under Obama and congress ass. Weed is not only the most important issue. IT IS THE ONLY ISSUE!!!
Demand Legalization Today! Write your congress-critter
Thinker
Apr 1 2009, 8:11 am
That's not true. More medical bills are coming up in states all the time, and these days most of them are passing. This is great news, and I'm glad to see that the Feds are beginning to see the light!
However, the question I was actually addressing was the outright taxation and legalization issue nationwide. As much as we all want to see it happen, and soon, right now isn't the time something like this would pass. If Obama were to introduce that legislation right now, the public would jump all over him because "Don't you care about the economy, unemployment, etc.?" and not only would the bill not pass in this current climate, but Obama would pretty much doom himself to be a one-termer and a lame duck president by introducing something some in the government would term frivolous at this time. You can't undo 62 years of prohibition in your first three months in office and not expect some backlash.
All I'm saying is that once things settle down a little bit in Obama's presidency, he'll have time to look at this seriously. I don't think he was laughing at the idea of legalization, but the question the way it was asked. If someone were to ask you if legalizing marijuana would fix the economy, you could say it'd help, but there are many other things at work too. The fact that he even brought up the question on television is more than any previous president would have done. Just give it time...we've waited this long, after all.
So not "poor Mr. Obama." I don't pity the guy at all, I just don't think this would pass yet. Get a few more states on the medical bandwagon, fix some other looming problems, and we could see it in a year or two. I hope...
Again,
Mar 31 2009, 1:46 pm
Anyone who knows anything about hemp knows that it has countless uses, and almost limitless potential for economic growth if it were grown and utilized industrially by this country, this is the "green" solution we have been looking for to replace fossil fuels, and the "green" technology the Obama stated he'd spend 15 billion dollars to create and fund. Not convinced that hemp is important? I got two words for you, "biodegradeable plastic." Those "forever in a landfill" plastic bottles replaced with biodegradable hemp plastic is a huge step tward enviormental protection, now imagine if all plastics from now on were biodegradeable, and all grown in the US? That is some serious economic growth right there. Not to mention hemp paper that doesn't require harsh chemicals to turn white, reducing chemical runoff into lakes and rivers, hemp cloths that don't fall apart and disintigrate like cotton does, and all the products we use fossil fuels for instead being made with hemp seed oil. THAT is economic growth and THAT is ending the oil dependancy problem. And THAT is what we should bring to the new presidents attention. Are you guys listening? Because this is important info to spread around. Look it up, it's all true.
i'd think
Mar 31 2009, 11:41 am
to thinker
Mar 31 2009, 11:38 am
Thinker
Mar 31 2009, 9:39 am
First of all, let's remember that Barack Obama has been president for about two months, give or take a little bit.
Let's also remember that marijuana has been illegal since 1937, and yes, legalization is coming, but it's probably going to take a little while.
Obama's got a few other problems to fix first...I can't blame him for taking the state of the economy a little more seriously than legalizing weed at the moment. Still, the fact that the general public is this interested in legalization this time around, plus the fact that this seems like the first president in a while who might listen rationally to an argument, means we're probably on the right path.
And come on folks...the anti-legalization people are doing everything they can to divide us and make us fail. Who cares what color anybody is? They're a human being just like you, and they like their ganja just as much as you like yours. The more we get together, the better front we present, and the sooner we win. So quit the name-calling, the racial slurs, and the complaining, because it's counterproductive. Go vote, join Norml or the MPP. Do something proactive for our cause, or you will forever be whining about how much you wish it was legal, instead of enjoying it when it is.
hmmm
Mar 31 2009, 6:45 am
umm
Mar 30 2009, 4:09 pm
Thank GOD for Gerald Celente !!!
Mario
Mar 30 2009, 3:13 pm
Common Sense
Mar 30 2009, 3:04 pm
Hahaha Dewwbo the Wonder Tard ! LOL , Thats some funny stuff .
HU210
Mar 30 2009, 12:38 pm
Provided the claim survived Summary judgement. It would still have to fly in front of a jury in order to obtain monetary damages. A long shot at best.
Provided you can find an attorney to persue it for you. Another real long shot.
HU210
Mar 30 2009, 12:27 pm
Just got to get him down to Step # 10. Have the government hes running take an an honest invetory of their irrational and destructive behavior's. Then promptly admit that they are wrong.
See how that treatment crap can cut both ways.
Drug Courts=Star Chambers
tidbit
Mar 30 2009, 11:07 am
Racial and economical
Mar 30 2009, 11:03 am
The law was enacted be cause Mexican workers were pouring over the border and bringing pot with them to use as bartering for
food and lodging. It was also lobbied against by the cotton
and pulp paper companies because both were protecting their market,hemp was starting to take a bite out of their pockets
and it was the same then as now,money talks,and shit walks.
umm
Mar 30 2009, 10:59 am
So who gives a flying fuck what the haters say, if Mr Boyers is onto something, the only way to see if the seeds will germinate is to broadcast the seeds of knowlege, and see what grows out of it.
umm
Mar 30 2009, 10:55 am
It obvious ya won't find ANY cases yet.
umm
Mar 30 2009, 10:53 am
jim rogers
Mar 30 2009, 7:38 am
to Below
Mar 30 2009, 7:11 am
Check it out
Mar 30 2009, 5:28 am
down to Mar 3 5:55 pm Comment from "Baltimore Fred " and watch how he curses and throws profanity at what he knew was a little old lady . Read comments up till today .
Let him know how you feel about that.
????????
Mar 30 2009, 4:31 am
can ya cite any cases for these "reperations"
cases that involved a monetary award and not just remedy compelling the government to act one way or the other?
ya got the cart before the horse. There is reason to sue now.
proud imbiber
Mar 29 2009, 11:18 pm
Obama was laughing out of nervousness. The feds & obama are clearly afraid they'll be sued for compensation after legalizing. Pot can never really be legalized unless we make a consession of having a solution for reparations. Its very simple. We have to make an offer, and we can do that through an injunction. We can file that through a class action suit, or we can file it through an interveaner with the courts.
Now to address the liability issues, we can make the position that the pot industry could levy a charge on it to pay these damages.
We are at whats called a tort in law. The tort is the government has to legalize it, but they can't cause they can't afford the liability. A tort is where one idea conflicts with another and the whole marijuana issue is nothing but one giant tort, because the government can't get out of it. Its sad to say but they can't, and they can't pass a law saying we passed a law that legalizes pot, and we the government aren't paying any damages. The government can't do that. Lawfully, they can't do that. But the marijuana community "we" can make an offer to pay damages to the people who suffered in the marijuana community, and the biggest thing we can do is hire them. If a guy went to jail for growing, give him a job at a grow op when he gets out. If a guy got busted selling pot, give him a job selling pot through the clubs. That would be the best thing we could do to those who have suffered hardship is give them a job. It would be the number one reparation that you could do to everyone of the people who have suffered. Everybody that broke the law, did so because its a bad law.
Shortened and edited From marijuanamans hash plant video with the brilliant and honerable Marc Boyer...
maloy99
Mar 29 2009, 10:36 pm
fuck obama! liein piece of shit
mba1189
Mar 29 2009, 10:31 pm
I realize that most local tv stations wont allow commercials advocating marijuana especially those in states without mmj laws. But does Cali ever have pro-mmj commercials on tv? Also, youtube would be a great place to put such videos. NORML, think about it!!!
wanda de justus
Mar 29 2009, 10:03 pm
BG
Mar 29 2009, 10:01 pm
you have to take your lumps,be cool and crush 'em with the truth.shear numbers in support does help a hell of a lot.stay motivated...educate everyone around you to the facts.
just someone
Mar 29 2009, 9:10 pm
Mobilize, set a date, gather a VERY BIG crowd in front of city halls, governor's houses, sheriff offices, etc... smoke a joint right under their faces, and don't offer resistance to being arrested.
What will they do? Arrest hundreds of thousands of people in a single day? Maybe even over a million of 2 people? And if they do, don't you think that would cause a nation wide uproar against those arrests?
HU210
Mar 29 2009, 7:58 pm
She is correct that this american drug war was goaded on by the use of racisist tales in congress in 1937.
However I would have thought that the new president of change would be aware of this and by all means play the race card. Shit anything to end our longest war against ourselves.
That said.
Say Miss heide hoe. sit on down a spell and smoke some of this while i tell ya some about an old redhead blueeyed whiteboy's world wide womanizin. O.K. I will leave out thailand, vietnam, mexico, bahamas(many wild flavors there), Jamacia.
Back in late 70's and just out o the marines. I was back in my home town. was at a musical gathering of some friends who had formed a blues unit with black and white friends I'd gone to school with.
Pretty much a weed smoking beer drinking garage band.( 2 band members sent me weed in Japan!) But good enough to get at least a charity gig. I mean play for a charity gig, they wernt paid.
Anyway, an acquaintence (black baptist preachers daughter) from school was there and we were hitting it off dancin and such. The place was on fire with some almost yellow gold looking santamarta weed. About 6lb found in center of a 40 lb brick as ledgend goes.
So morning rols around and I wake up at the preachers daughters house.
Well hell I forgot where I was going with all that.
Long story short I have sampled many flavors of woman over the years. Aint found one that wasnt pink inside where the good stuff is. Come on I mean heart (:
you guys are dumb
Mar 29 2009, 7:49 pm
gstlab3
Mar 29 2009, 7:39 pm
HU210
Mar 29 2009, 7:05 pm
It costs the government far more to enforce the forfiture laws than they ever collect by "selling drug dealers confiscated houses for pennys on the dollar" as the commercials crow.
They lose more money enforcing small amounts cases than they will ever confiscate, or recevive in fines. Cops dont work cheap, nor do court personal, probation/ parole officers, etc.
True enough they seem to have a blank check to rob the public treasury's both state and federal to keep themselves employed running the anti-drug effort. But this is not a profitable venture for the taxpayer, by any accounting standard
you guys are dumb
Mar 29 2009, 6:44 pm
BG
Mar 29 2009, 5:31 pm
we are at a turning point and "NO MERCY!!" should be our battle cry until we've won.Get up and brush the dirt off, it's time to fight(and not with each other,what are we, congress?)
OBAMA says he doesnt want to TAX
Mar 29 2009, 5:25 pm
Let's see if he has anything else in mind. Maybe he just didnt want to TAX MARJIUANA IN THE FIRST PLACE!
WE SHOULD HAVE A RALLY/Global MARCH AS YOU WILL.. TO SUPPORT OBAMA IN A TOPIC THAT COULD HAVE BEEN IGNORED, LET HIM KNOW THIS IS OUR DECSION AND NOT HIS AND THE POEPLE HAVE SPOKEN!
hey heide
Mar 29 2009, 4:35 pm
anonymous
Mar 29 2009, 4:10 pm
with the crude oil and pharmaceutical industries so that was the original reason for prohibition. The second prohibition and scheduling came with the hippie movement where the government was worried that the next generation of leaders would be "good for nothing hippies" that would destroy this country with their views and laziness . The racism was simply propaganda to play in to the minds of simpletons such as your self and further divide the masses. And I have see the white chicks black dudes date and trust me we dont want you anyways scro!
anonymous
Mar 29 2009, 4:00 pm
heyaraw
Mar 29 2009, 3:26 pm
heide
Mar 29 2009, 1:55 pm
anonymous
Mar 29 2009, 1:08 pm
anonymous
Mar 29 2009, 12:09 pm
heide
Mar 29 2009, 11:14 am
no1 reason pathetic excuse cannabis aka marijuana was criminalized
congress was told it makes white women seek relations with black men,,, an unjust law based on race,,and obvious penis size envy,,,,,,,,and it is BULLSHIT,,,,, the white man so fears those who are different..he feels he must cage or destroy....
funny thing is it back fired,,it didnt stop nuthin,,,, my family is proof of that as well as many other people i know
mixed breeds all over the damb place,,and it rocks
please
Mar 29 2009, 6:54 am
j2o - reefer madness
because every cause needs battlecry music.
what?!
Mar 29 2009, 12:47 am
examine the question
Mar 29 2009, 12:24 am
sickofthebullshit
Mar 28 2009, 11:28 pm
Skin color is important. Hating those who have a different skin color is normal here in the forums. For some, they're whole life is centered around sexual organs, and the fascination of the different sizes. It is little wonder why the country is in the shape its in. Drunk idiots.
heide
Mar 28 2009, 9:43 pm
believe me its not gonna help,,your little tiny penis will still be just that,,tiny
so please grow up,,if you havent got any good suggestions for this issue,,then go back to sucking your thumbs,,big ass babys
gstlab3
Mar 28 2009, 8:41 pm
yung age
Mar 28 2009, 5:34 pm
next election i aint even gonna vote fuck it!!!
To REALLY legalize pot
Mar 28 2009, 3:48 pm
Now, they just can't legalize, so there has to be a creative legal move done by we the oppressed because if we don't make a consession of having a solution for reparations, its never going to happen. Its very simple. We have to make an offer, and we can do that through an injunction. We can file that through a class action suit, or we can file it through an interveaner with the courts. The reality is that we have a war on drugs. The reality is that this war on drugs has no one to negotiate peace with. We have to give peace a chance. There are so many people who have been harmed by this law that its impossible for the legislature to change tha law because it would bankrupt the government. There would be millions and millions of claims that would have to be paid. Now to address the liability issues, we can make the position that the pot industry could levy a charge on it to pay these damages.
People who have done jail time really do deserve compensation for all the harm caused by bigotry hate and lies. Now theres no way they can legalize, and they're going to continue their bullshit lies. Its the only defence they've got.
We are at whats called a tort in law. The tort is the government has to legalize it, but they can't cause they can't afford the liability. A tort is where one idea conflicts with another and the whole marijuana issue is nothing but one giant tort, because the government can't get out of it. Its sad to say but they can't, and they can't pass a law saying we passed a law that legalizes pot, and wethe government aren't paying any damages. The government can't do that. Lawfully, they can't do that. But the marijuana community "we" can make an offer to pay damages to the people who suffered in the marijuana community, and the biggest thing we can do is hire them. If a guy went to jail for growing, give him a job at a grow op when he gets out. If a guy got busted selling pot, give him a job selling pot through the clubs. That would be the best thing we could do to those who have suffered hardship is give them a job. It would be the number one reparation that you could do to everyone of the people who have suffered. Everybody that broke the law, did so because its a shitty law.
From marijuanamans hash plant video with the brilliant and honerable Marc Boyer
John Galt
Mar 28 2009, 11:58 am
You all should really watch The Obama Deception, on YouTube. Here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
Ha, I fully support the legalization of cannabis, but the thing is: even if they DO legalize it, that will only be a move to appease and distract you while they take more and more of your freedoms away, and increase the debt that we the taxpayers have to pay back.
So, don't mistake any legalization effort by the Federal Government as a good thing. It needs to come from the States up. The Federal Government is the most corrupt organized-crime-syndicate that ever existed.
Again, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
kokoshka
Mar 28 2009, 9:57 am
Way to go assholes, I voted for Nader.
lol
Mar 28 2009, 9:54 am
Mature Adult
Mar 28 2009, 7:35 am
with the rest of the nations problems although I have little faith in that . He has always reminded me of a used car salesman . :o)
HU210
Mar 28 2009, 7:27 am
http://www.CopsSayLegalizeDrugs.com/health
LMAO
Mar 28 2009, 7:13 am
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PRESIDENCY . What the hell were you people thinking ?
dro
Mar 28 2009, 1:47 am
YOU CAN VIEW IT'S ENTIRETY ON YOUTUBE.
OBAMA IS NOTHING MORE THAN A PUPPET AS WELL AS EVERY OTHER SITTING PRESIDENT. THEY ANSWER TO THE WORLD BANKERS AKA "THE ELITE"
WE HAVE BIGGER PROBLEMS THAN THE LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA, TRUST ME!!!
I WANT IT LEGAL JUST AS BAD AS YOU BUT THIS IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT!!! SPREAD THE WORD!!!
infowars.com
dro
Mar 28 2009, 1:38 am
OBAMA IS NOTHING MORE THAN A PUPPET AS WELL AS ALL OTHER SITTING PRESIDENTS WHILE THEY ANSWER TO THE WORLD BANKERS AKA "THE ELITE'.
THIS IS NOT A JOKE. THE MOVIE CAN BE FOUND IN IT'S ENTIRETY ON YOUTUBE. IT'S 2 HOURS LONG SO TAKE A TOKE AND RISE UP!!!
FORGET THE POT LAWS FOR NOW WE HAVE BIGGER PROBLEMS THAN THAT, TRUST ME!!!
"THE OBAMA DECEPTION"
http://www.infowars.com
red man
Mar 28 2009, 12:52 am
GanjaDave
Mar 27 2009, 11:32 pm
kloud9nine
Mar 27 2009, 10:49 pm
hmm
Mar 27 2009, 8:16 pm
HU210
Mar 27 2009, 7:52 pm
Global Marijuana march anyone?
http://www.globalmarijuanamarch.org/
reality
Mar 27 2009, 7:48 pm
Economy is what it is!
CAUSE YOU CANT MAKE PEOPLE WANT TO BUY THINGS JUST BY THROWING MONEY AT THE BANKS!!!
rally
Mar 27 2009, 7:15 pm
is both expensive and with as many as would possibly show up,the logistics would be staggering.
But everyone could go to their county seat,to the courthouse and ask to speak to the sheriff of your county,and carry signs
and chant slogans. If we can coordinate it too happen at the same time,even the government can't ignore that many walking,talking voters Back too the 60's one more time,watch for further developments and announcements by MPP and possibly
NORML. To steal a phrase,we can do this.
G
Mar 27 2009, 7:00 pm
people
Mar 27 2009, 6:44 pm
Obama saying no just helped our cause, research people, open your eyes.
idiots
Mar 27 2009, 6:41 pm
karma smoke
Mar 27 2009, 6:16 pm
Supporter
Mar 27 2009, 5:51 pm
Instead of spending billions/trillions on fighting an endless “war” that was created by the government in the first place when they impossed a law that infringes on a persons individual liberty and trying to enforce it. They could easily and simply put regulations in place and actually reverse all that wasteful spending of tax payers money into generating revenue for the economy. The only way to put an end to the cartels and their violence is to re-evaluate the US drug policies and pass regulations in this country to control the drugs legally within our own borders.
You mentioned that your a true believer in persistance. We must realize that just as determined as our ancestorial anti-prohibition supporters were in the past to get prohibition over-turned and still continue to do everything in their power to attain alcohol, that history is destined to repeat itself when you ignore it and not deal with the issue seriously and intelligently.
Since the US is the most wealthy and has the highest demand for marijuana, it will continue to always be the main source of revenue for the cartels. The only way to put a stop to the cartels and the violence is to rethink our drug policies and put into action regulations in this country to control them within our own borders. The desire for money & power is so great that it becomes an addiction in itself. Our capitalistic mentality inspires & motivates people to take extreme lengths to posses it. We put so much importance and need on both that its almost a life & death struggle to achieve it. If you don't have it your impaired and are burdened from the lack of it. The way our world has shown us to work is that only the people who have the influence of power & authority ever get the respect and adoration they are seeking and if your unable to achieve it through power then money is the next best way to purchase it with, and when someones power & finances are threatened they will resort to intimidation and harm to retain it.
This nation is a pharmaceutical nation. We have drugs for everything. The most addictive and dangerous ones are the "man-made" chemically processed drugs.
Stopping prohibition proved to work in helping the county out of the great depression by creating legitimate jobs, businesses and revenue for the country. In the process it lifted the growing burden off the government resources fighting it so it could focus them on more important issues like WWII. Instead of spending money on trying to stop the free will of the people on things that they feel is their individual liberty and choice to participate in or not, why not use that additional money to strengthen and focus the attention and resources on the more dire issues like a dirty bomb smuggled into the US because of our pores borders and ports that could possibly kill millions of americans with them having no choice in the matter. I would think common sense and rational thinking would want to give people choices in a free society instead of prohibiting and restricting their ability to make mature adult decisions on their own and not have government think that they know whats best for them... ex. abortion & stem cell research.
A free market that has competition is better than a black market that has no restrictions or regulations on it to ensure fair and safe commerce.
I would like to hear you intellegentlly defend why you feel that alcohol & tobacco can continue to still be legal and be in favor of keeping alcohol & tobacco legal when there is an organization specificly formed to treat the alcoholism desease called AA. You mentioned Tueday night that you like to know what your talking about before you speak…. I would be very curious on your knowledge of the cannibas/hemp plant and its potential uses and why you felt to dismiss and ignore the positives of regulating it, but so quickly to condem it??? How can you logically and intellegently be in favor of keeping such a destructive product like alcohol & tobacco legal when they have NO health benefits and only increase the reasons why health insurance is so high and difficult to get for people who use them!? At least Marijuana/Cannibas/Hemp has shown to be beneficial economicly, medically and environmentally.
You mention that if we keep putting of healthcare reform that it will never get resolved... well, if we continue down the same old path of prohibition and "war on drugs" not considering the pro's of legalizing a naturally growing plant nothing will ever change on how violence is connected to drugs. It will continue to be a perennial disease on our economy. Its not the panacea, but what does not kill us will only strengthen us.
unity
Mar 27 2009, 4:53 pm
we have to do it before they start putting us into concentration camps called FEMA camps.
justice4all
Mar 27 2009, 4:26 pm
umm
Mar 27 2009, 4:19 pm
confused
Mar 27 2009, 3:59 pm
FRAGLE ROCK IS BACK YEAH!
Mar 27 2009, 3:01 pm
wozd?
Mar 27 2009, 2:31 pm
USF Libertarian
Mar 27 2009, 1:59 pm
HU210
Mar 27 2009, 1:33 pm
All in favor say, I
» add a comment