Tue, Sep 08, 2009 3:38 pm
Source: azstarnet.com
PHOENIX -- The state's interest in banning marijuana outweighs the religious beliefs of an individual that he is entitled to use the drug anywhere, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled today.
In a unanimous opinion, the justices said state law permits the government to "burden the exercise of religion'' only if it shows a compelling interest and that the restrictions are the "least restrictive means of furthering that interest.'' And Daniel Hardesty conceded to the court that there is some governmental interest in the regulation of marijuana.
But Chief Justice Rebecca White Berch said that, given the claim by Hardesty that his membership in the Church of Cognizance allows him to use marijuana anywhere and anytime -- including driving -- it is clear that the "least restrictive means'' of the government to further its interests in protecting the public is an outright ban.
Today's ruling, however, does not foreclose the possibility that the state's high court might not conclude that some other religious use of marijuana is acceptable.
Berch pointed out that courts have allowed users of peyote to use federal laws to shield them from prosecution against state drug laws. She said, though, there is "an obvious difference'' between the situations.
"Members of the Native American Church assert only the religious right to use peyote in limited sacramental rights,'' the chief justice wrote. "Hardesty asserts the right to use marijuana whenever he pleases, including while driving.''
Hardesty was arrested in 2005 after being stopped by police while driving in Yavapai County.
At trial, Hardesty testified that he had been a practicing member of the Church of Cognizance since 1993.
And a church official said that the religion, founded in 1991, is based on "neo-Zoroastrian tenets" and that marijuana provides a connection to the divine mind and spiritual enlightenment.
Today's ruling is the second defeat in two years for members of the Church of Cognizance.
Last year a Graham County couple that claims to have founded the religion in the early 1990s were found guilty of possession and conspiracy with intent to distribute marijuana after being stopped with 172 pounds of marijuana in their vehicle near Las Cruces, N.M. A federal judge in New Mexico rejected their religious freedom arguments.
Dan Quaintance was sentenced to five years in prison; his wife, Mary, was sentenced to two to three years.
» add a comment
stixandstones
Sep 21 2009, 1:13 am
Anyways it doesnt seem likely that our Bill of Rights will ever be what they were meant to be, i.e. the Patriot Act. Someones use of marijuana for religious or even personal gain should not be denied, that supreme court judge just ass raped his rights and made a mockery of him.
Ghostwolf
Sep 16 2009, 2:20 am
GET A CLUE
Sep 16 2009, 12:56 am
old germany
Sep 13 2009, 8:47 am
hmmm
Sep 13 2009, 7:11 am
gstlab3
Sep 12 2009, 8:10 pm
PEACE!!!
GROW YOUR OWN!!! FREE YOUR MIND AND FREE THE PLANET!!!!
smoke2more
Sep 12 2009, 12:06 pm
Ghostwolf
Sep 12 2009, 3:19 am
6uldvnt
Sep 11 2009, 12:37 pm
Deny Religion
6uldvnt
Sep 11 2009, 12:35 pm
There is no reason why ANYONE should be allowed to operate a 2 ton potential death machine (a car) while under the influence of ANY drug, legal or otherwise. His personal/religious freedoms have not been violated in any way.
Sit on your couch or in your church (might be the same thing) and blaze or drink or drop or roll or whatever you want to do to your mind or body. It's yours to do with as you please. But be sober and rested when you get behind the wheel. If your hurt someone else, or try to hurt someone else by acting like an idiot, that's when your rights and freedoms end. Nuff said.
Der Mann
Sep 10 2009, 9:07 pm
Peace from deutchland!
Moron Billy
Sep 10 2009, 7:14 am
Hey, let's OUTLAW, Candy-bars, they rot your teeth, make ya fat, and they are messy. Their should be a law against that.
DO YA NEED MORE EXAMPLES OF STUPIED THINKING ? ? ? ? ?
Masterbating: Let's outlaw that one for sure, ha, ha, ha.....
Picking your nose: their should a law against that.
Do you get the point? We could OUTLAW anything, cause we are that retarded, don't like it, what ya gonna do about it. Make it against the LAW: To voice my opinion.
The government uses things like this to confuse the masses.
And as long as they have the power to do that we are at their mersey. Now let's watch football!
I'm lost
Sep 9 2009, 10:07 pm
May there be peace on earth!!
208
Sep 9 2009, 5:48 pm
they are corrupt as fuck
just want to tell u what u want to hear. they are the biggest gang in america fuck da cia and all government officals
u2 the cia
Sep 9 2009, 8:11 am
hmmm
Sep 9 2009, 3:09 am
Ghostwolf
Sep 8 2009, 11:56 pm
Putin
Sep 8 2009, 11:13 pm
gstlab3
Sep 8 2009, 9:30 pm
LOOSER!!!
gstlab3
Sep 8 2009, 9:29 pm
IF YOU HAPPEN TO SMOKE SOME REAL DANKNESS YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PAY THAT GOOD OF ATTENTION TO DRIVING AS WAS STATED.,
THIS PLANT ENABLES THE USER TO CONNECT WITH THE DIVINE.
FROM EVEN A LAYPERSONS PERSPECTIVE YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT THIS ACTIVITY WILL DEFINITLEY INTERFERE WITH YOUR CONNECTION TO THIS PLAIN OF TIME AND SPACE AND YOUR EARTHLY REALM.,EVEN I KNOW THE DIVINE AND CREATIVE FORCE DOES NOT DWELL LONG WITH MAN AND SURE AS HELL DOES NOT DRIVE!!!
THE ONLY EXPIERIANCE I HAVE WITH THE DIVINE AND DRIVING IS WHEN I WAS ALLOWED TO LIVE AFTER BEING EJECTED FROM A SPEEDING PICK-UP TRUCK. I DO NOT RECOMMEND BLAZING AND DRIVING.,OR THAT OTHER STUFF ESPECIALLY THE OTHER STUFF.,BOOZIING AND CRUISING LEADS TO BRUISING AND DEATH!!! AND ON A BAD NIGHT JAIL TOO!!!!! FUCK THAT NOISE MAN!!!
GROW YOUR OWN AND FREE YOUR MIND!!!!! AND DO'NT DRIVE PEACE!
Wilber
Sep 8 2009, 8:09 pm
anonymous
Sep 8 2009, 5:58 pm
James Crosby
Sep 8 2009, 4:18 pm
This makes me angry, seeing people's rights being taken away because someone else doesn't think they are correct.. Stay out of adults lives, and let us live them.
» add a comment