Ahnold Wants to ‘Debate’ Legalization
Wed, May 06, 2009 11:43 am
During a press conference on Tuesday, California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said it’s “time for a debate” on the legalization of marijuana, particularly as a way to raise revenue in the cash-strapped Golden State.
“I think all of those ideas of creating extra revenues, I’m always for an open debate on it.” Schwarzenegger said. “And I think we ought to study very carefully what other countries are doing that have legalized marijuana and other drugs, what effect did it have on those countries?”
It’s well known that the governor of the nation’s premiere marijuana growing state is no stranger to Mary Jane. He famously puffed a joint after winning the Mr. Olympia competition, a scene captured forever in the film Pumping Iron.
Schwarzenegger’s comments lend additional momentum to a bill introduced in February by California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, of San Francisco, which would legalize marijuana for adults and reportedly raise at least $1.5 billion in tax revenue in its first year.
Further Coverage:
California Should Study Pot Laws
Majority of Californians Support Legalization










» add a comment
legalizeitnow
Jun 30 2009, 2:08 pm
there are lots of problems here but this is the answer to some of the major ones.
anonymous
Jun 21 2009, 10:20 pm
bigboy
Jun 21 2009, 10:07 pm
HU210
May 31 2009, 6:04 am
Hemp Man
May 30 2009, 9:04 pm
Bongbarian
May 28 2009, 10:46 am
barrack obama
May 21 2009, 2:39 pm
This is not a joke
Join the movement!
Copy and paste this to as many videos as possible!
Together we can end this hysterical war against marijuana!
old hippie
May 18 2009, 7:36 am
old hippie
May 18 2009, 7:35 am
budsbuddy
May 14 2009, 10:14 am
treehugger
May 12 2009, 1:07 pm
dittohead
May 12 2009, 12:31 am
treehugger
May 11 2009, 10:08 pm
treehugger
May 11 2009, 10:01 pm
Dittohead
May 11 2009, 9:56 pm
treehugger
May 11 2009, 9:50 pm
I mean the white/hispanic catholic, prodestant global regime.
Stoney republican
May 11 2009, 7:47 pm
treehugger
May 11 2009, 5:53 pm
I don't have a pessimistic outlook, just not looking good, so far, based on the past 100 years.
stoney republican
May 11 2009, 5:13 pm
stoney republican
May 11 2009, 5:10 pm
treehugger
May 11 2009, 2:12 pm
treehugger
May 11 2009, 2:08 pm
I already have voted, really but pleading guilty. For the asshole that shot John Lennon or Kennedy or MLK, and the 10,000 doin life as non-violent offenders!!!
The white man may be powerful, be he isn't even safe from himself. I don't profess to know the future, but I do know where this planet is heading - and it ain't pretty. You don't have to worry that our sun will burn-out in 4 billion years, or that an asteroid will kill half of you within 40,000 years, or that you could be looking at an ice-age within 8 years if you keep polluting - cuz you won't have an animal or plant to consume in less than 1,000.
White man's days are numbered...Just a thought...
stoney repblican
May 11 2009, 1:15 pm
VOTING IS THE CORNERSTONE OF JEFFERSONIAN DEMOCRACY!
treehugger
May 11 2009, 12:41 pm
Then, against Washington's advice, then they added 9 no 11 no 22 no 13 no 17.....
treehugger
May 11 2009, 12:32 pm
They claim pot makes you stupid, temporartily for short-term..can't find the glasses on your head, maybe. But I'll put my brainpan against any recent college grad anyday. "Makes em lazy too", yet these kids are now pushin 300 .lbs at age 6, diabetic, risk of stroke, collapsed lungs cuz their boobs are too big. Yah, that sound healthy and productive to me.
Anyway, you don't need to be a registered voter to send letters to an elected official, you're still a resident/constituant/tax payer.
E-BOMB, maybe then...
stoney republican
May 11 2009, 9:38 am
HU210
May 10 2009, 9:12 pm
Let’s examine what the Constitution says. What are the requirements to become president? Section 1 of Article II of the U.S. Constitution states that a president must:
(Note: MUST, is a substantive predicate)
-be a natural born citizen of the United States;
-be at least 35 years old;
-have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years.
MauiWoweeRaquel
May 10 2009, 4:10 pm
Please Vote for me for Miss High Times at :
http://misshightimes.com/users/mauiwowee
Mahalo!!!
Peace & Aloha
Raquel xoxo
gstlab3
May 10 2009, 2:00 pm
treehugger
May 10 2009, 11:28 am
Go to NORML.com (send em $25, $1,000 if I was growin, while you're there) click on Take Action and type in your zip code. Then you can send a letter to your state rep's and the prez and his crew. Use the damn shift key for your name and address (these people have 10 years of college - and sucking dicks or taking-it-in-the-ass) so punctuation is prudent. send them this:
WE PETITION THAT...
When you called the War on Drugs an "utter failure" in 2004, you were right. A 2008 Zogby poll found that 3 out of 4 of Americans agree with you.
When appointing the head of your Office of National Drug Control Policy, please select someone with health, science, or education credentials rather than a military general, law enforcement official, or "tough on drugs" politician. The next "Drug Czar" should base policy on proven methodology rather than counterproductive ideology. At a minimum, he or she should support these measures:
*Ending the racially unjust disparity in sentencing for crack and powder cocaine.
*Ending the practice of prosecuting patients in states with medical marijuana laws.
*Eliminating the federal law that denies financial aid to students with drug convictions.
We all know that the War on Drugs is failing because handcuffs don't cure addictions -- doctors do. You have the opportunity to bring us the change we need. Will you?
Sincerely
put your name here, sit back, and breathe deeply :)
HU210
May 10 2009, 9:31 am
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090508/OPINION01/905080356/1035/archive
treehugger
May 10 2009, 9:27 am
These supporters grew into the Federalist Party, which wanted a fiscally sound and strong nationalistic government and was opposed by the Democratic-Republicans. The United States' only Federalist president was John Adams; although George Washington is believed to have been broadly sympathetic to the Federalist program, he remained an independent his entire term.
Ya think any of them were born in the USA? Arnold for pres!
treehugger
May 10 2009, 9:10 am
HU210
May 10 2009, 8:32 am
This isnt to say that there not lengthy nonsense,off topic etc., posts. But those are easy to identify in a few setences or even by the posters handle.
Happy Mothers Day. we wouldnt be here without ya.
jax
May 9 2009, 11:56 pm
HU210
May 9 2009, 7:48 pm
treehugger
May 9 2009, 2:03 pm
But with guidelines, like everything else, liquor, cigs, dynamite. Over 21, unless you got the medical card, no bodagos in residential neighbohoods, same restriction as liqour for personal consumption - drink yourself to death, but don't sell it for profit without a permit, and no walk-in customers. You take your extra stash to the dispensary or local co-op to sell.
But the Attorney General said you must operate as non-profit! Medical insurance probably won't cover it yet, they want to tax the shit out of it, and we're to operate as not-for-profit? I don't want to charge the terminally ill $1,000 an oz either, supply and demand is supposed to set the price, for us capitalists anyway.
treehugger
May 9 2009, 1:43 pm
chris - it will take only one State Attorney (probably CA) hopefully with assistance from U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to bring the raids cases to the Supreme Court. Once they rule - the bullshit will end. Like that. Like it never happened. Then you get them to release those non-violents out of prison.
treehugger
May 9 2009, 12:53 pm
hey dittohead
May 9 2009, 11:25 am
So we aren't supposed to have lice, but rather maggots. My mistake. But really, to associate with such a person. Why?
treehugger
May 9 2009, 10:56 am
Aww
May 8 2009, 10:44 pm
Whatever.
anomenis
May 8 2009, 10:17 pm
stoney republican
May 8 2009, 8:55 pm
stoney republican
May 8 2009, 8:48 pm
And if you have trouble reading the long comments... ADD. Medical pot may help.
BIG SULLY
May 8 2009, 2:10 pm
And
May 8 2009, 1:33 pm
William F. Buckley, Jr.
May 8 2009, 1:32 pm
timothy stoner
May 8 2009, 12:20 pm
gra$$ root$
May 8 2009, 10:56 am
dj420
May 8 2009, 10:30 am
treehugger
May 8 2009, 9:57 am
Mandatory training or inspections of the procucts being sent to market, (no one I know wants to smoke DDT) same restrictions as to the number of tomatoes I can grow as an individual - as many as I want. But if I sell some back to my neighborhood co-op or to a friend, then I should pay taxes on it just like everything else.
treehugger
May 8 2009, 9:50 am
If you're referring to what I think you are, the carbon credits?, it does seem strange, but they are actually willing to TRY something instead of decades of talking. And there's no doubt, in a capitalistic society, money talks and those corporations will respond with better technology = cleaner air water.
treehugger
May 8 2009, 9:42 am
stoney republican
May 8 2009, 9:39 am
stoney republican
May 8 2009, 9:30 am
treehugger
May 8 2009, 9:29 am
What about Nancy, I thought they were at least trying some ideas out there?
treehugger
May 8 2009, 9:21 am
Moreover how responsive they are to your concerns, it shouldn't take 60 years to reverse something that took 60 day to enact. We enact laws based on the concerns of a few elites, and don't bother to actually take the pulse of the constituants.
Remove the politics/bureaucracy, and get the vote from the people. With the technology we have to today, every voters voice should be heard. Remove the politicians, lower the gov't employees to mayber 20% of our workforce (currently 33%) and you get a 15% refund on your income tax by taking a few minutes to complete an online survey or casting your own vote. And perhaps those people can go out and be productive members of society - instead of sitting around for hundreds of years arguing "wear a red shirt, no wear a blue shirt". Just a thought...
stoney republican
May 8 2009, 9:09 am
stoney republican
May 8 2009, 9:03 am
treehugger
May 8 2009, 8:20 am
treehugger
May 8 2009, 8:18 am
stoney republican
May 8 2009, 8:08 am
stoney republican
May 8 2009, 6:52 am
dittohead
May 8 2009, 6:37 am
Say true. I am for the freedom to explore one own conciosness. The Legislation you speak of was put into place by a Republican president, true. But it was passed by a Democrat controlled congress. It was a bi-partasin effort to take away freedom. I have yet to see any lawmaker of any stripe put his balls on the line until yesterday. It was a proud moment in legalazation battle. it was orchestrated by a republican governer. When marijuana becomes legalized it will be under republican rule, watch it will. I figure this primarily because the democrat party is to busy trying to take away my guns my SUV, and my right to smoke in public to try to fix any problems of the past. How can you entrust the same party that is hell bent on making smoking cigaretts illegal to legalize the smoking of something that is not. I challange the logic.
F D Law
May 8 2009, 2:20 am
anonymous
May 8 2009, 12:47 am
^*-*^
May 7 2009, 11:48 pm
freetownbrown
May 7 2009, 8:36 pm
treehugger
May 7 2009, 8:21 pm
treehugger
May 7 2009, 8:18 pm
Just my opinion.
freetownbrown
May 7 2009, 8:18 pm
treehugger
May 7 2009, 8:09 pm
All I'm saying about Rush and the rest is quit the bullshit. You can argue red vs. blue until the end of time, or you can look around the marvels of the universe while you're here. Your choice.
Dittohead
May 7 2009, 7:47 pm
Rush is an Abbie Hoffeman. He said things deemed not right and challenged the government.
Its my patriotic duty to challange my government.
AND NOONE UNDER 80 EVEN KNOWS WHO THE HELL CHARLIE ROSE IS!!!
treehugger
May 7 2009, 7:41 pm
btw - anyway to get a hi-res of some of the centerfolds for my desktop? Other than unpacking my scanner (which probaly won't work with XP/usb 2.0).
Love your myspace backround.
treehugger
May 7 2009, 7:17 pm
Rush? Does anyone under the age of 80 actually listen to that shit?
My vote? I don't! I refuse to be labeled red or blue. Ass or Elephant? Nothing is that easy, it's all shades of gray. Every discussion/debate has people that have good ideas and some really stupid ideas. You have to take the best of all your constituants ideas, and put them to good use. Not debate it for 50 years until we're all dead.
danny danko
May 7 2009, 5:58 pm
My message to my fellow puffers - The war on flowers is over if you want it. Have you joined NORML yet? There's nothing to be afraid of. Click HERE to join. The tide is turning and we've reached the tipping point. Let's continue the momentum with a flood of new memberships! Who's with me?
i vote!!!!!!
May 7 2009, 1:01 pm
stoney republican
May 7 2009, 11:40 am
It would be cool if Obama and Ahnold got together with a wicked-fat blunt...
stoney republican
May 7 2009, 11:32 am
danko
May 7 2009, 11:05 am
Dittohead
May 7 2009, 10:53 am
stoney republican
May 7 2009, 10:51 am
stoney republican
May 7 2009, 10:49 am
danko
May 7 2009, 10:47 am
to the contrary
May 7 2009, 10:35 am
Dittohead
May 7 2009, 10:32 am
stoney republican
May 7 2009, 10:28 am
rush
May 7 2009, 10:24 am
There
May 7 2009, 10:22 am
Limbaugh Rocks
May 7 2009, 10:20 am
Limbaugh Rocks
May 7 2009, 10:15 am
you
May 7 2009, 9:58 am
You just have to have a hero that does your thinking for you don't you.
umm
May 7 2009, 9:57 am
Limbaugh Rocks
May 7 2009, 9:30 am
stoney republican
May 7 2009, 9:24 am
you know
May 7 2009, 8:41 am
stoney republican
May 7 2009, 8:23 am
Oh Yeah
May 7 2009, 3:42 am
Graham Hancock c2c
May 7 2009, 12:34 am
We have to respect the adults' right to explore his or her own consciousness, because if I am not sovereign over my own consciousness, then I am not sovereign over anything, and its a waste of time to talk about freedom.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdJrJ1cqwzc
Hot Off MSN
May 7 2009, 12:25 am
rdf0ster
May 7 2009, 12:21 am
tagman
May 7 2009, 12:10 am
G
May 6 2009, 11:18 pm
G
May 6 2009, 11:16 pm
SmokeWeedTillIDie
May 6 2009, 11:06 pm
Jah Love
May 6 2009, 9:52 pm
SD_Stoner
May 6 2009, 8:15 pm
unknownstoner
May 6 2009, 8:10 pm
heyheyheysmokeweedeveryday
May 6 2009, 8:01 pm
ariana!
May 6 2009, 7:29 pm
SKUNKASS
May 6 2009, 5:36 pm
cannabisxchick
May 6 2009, 5:33 pm
Debate?
May 6 2009, 5:33 pm
are sitting on ass doing nothing but alternately wringing their hands and figuring how they can get more money for nothing. We
are spending millions in Mexico fighting a billion dollar industry,and continuing to spend millions here,too fight the war on drugs that has utterly failed. The time for debate is gone. It's time too shit or get off the pot! You can remove 70%
of the cartels cash flow by legalizing pot now,and ending the
cartels pot market by November,or when we all harvest our own.
Fuck them all.grow your own
SNOWMAN
May 6 2009, 5:20 pm
5blunts aday keepsthedoctor away
May 6 2009, 4:53 pm
make it happen governator!
doobiebrother
May 6 2009, 4:49 pm
chris
May 6 2009, 4:47 pm
eL ozzy
May 6 2009, 4:45 pm
Arnold I love you...
May 6 2009, 4:34 pm
dankbuzz420nMD
May 6 2009, 4:30 pm
p.s thankgoodness for sour diesel n my neck of the woods
sergie420
May 6 2009, 3:59 pm
arnold, your fuckin old man
peacelock
May 6 2009, 3:48 pm
anonymous
May 6 2009, 3:44 pm
JoePuffa
May 6 2009, 3:34 pm
Stained Glass Torture
May 6 2009, 3:32 pm
po aka MC
May 6 2009, 3:25 pm
peter oakes aka MC
May 6 2009, 3:21 pm
anonymous
May 6 2009, 3:14 pm
Steve-o
May 6 2009, 2:17 pm
» add a comment