Former Drug Czar Destroyed in Pot Debate
Mon, May 11, 2009 12:31 pm
Arnold asked for a legalization debate, and so here you go… John Walters, George Bush’s Drug Czar, still lying, still torturing logic, still an idiot, only now he’s no longer cashing taxpayer checks. Instead, he’s on CNN, pitted against the Harvard professor who wrote “The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition,” a highly influential study that’s fueling a lot of the recent debate about legalizing marijuana as a way to bolster the economy.
Watch in awe as Professor Jeffrey Miron uses such rare strategies as “reason” and “logic” to expose the utter bullshit being spewed by one of the biggest assholes in recent memory. This is indeed the beginning of the end for Walters and his herbicidal ilk. So light a fattie and give thanks.
And while America’s long suffering pot smokers may be tempted to skip the debate and head straight to the legalization, we need to remember that it takes time to undue almost a century of pot propaganda. But rest assured, fellow stoners, now that the reality-based debate on marijuana has begun, it’s one that we will surely win!











» add a comment
ThEtRuTh
Jun 29 2009, 8:29 pm
ao
Jun 24 2009, 10:51 am
hotfootrun
Jun 24 2009, 5:37 am
power to the people
DocLamkin
Jun 23 2009, 5:41 pm
Mike224
Jun 22 2009, 5:28 pm
dirtydirt420
Jun 22 2009, 12:57 pm
deaf16
Jun 16 2009, 7:46 pm
bongbarian
Jun 10 2009, 9:38 am
I love pot
Jun 9 2009, 4:09 am
Pots safe
Jun 9 2009, 4:03 am
Smoker for life
Jun 9 2009, 3:47 am
Mr. Green
Jun 9 2009, 3:37 am
Another pot smoker
Jun 9 2009, 3:29 am
AC
Jun 5 2009, 1:31 am
yeswecannabis
Jun 3 2009, 10:32 pm
Our relationship with plants is so primordial, so integral to our well being, no government has the right to interfere in any way with our consumption of plant materials of any kind. Will they tell us how much air to breathe and water to drink next? Plants are our medicine, kept us alive since we began! Synthetic drugs are dangerous used as directed. Cannabis can safely replace many of them.
Pot is decriminalized pretty much in certain areas of California, and other states. More people demanding this milder, safer recreational drug that also kills cancer cells, while protecting nerves, eyes and lungs, will slowly bring about an an end to prohibition.
Senior citizens these days have been smoking weed for forty years now. No one can tell us that shibai about 'pot is bad for you'. We know. It's all good. The THC is a cancer killer. Everything the Feds ever said about pot was a lie.
Send money to the groups like DPA, MPP, NORML, SSDP and ACLU. Send them something! We can win this.
mike jones
Jun 3 2009, 3:35 am
bush administration vs harvard professor
i smell a fatality
anonymous
May 31 2009, 4:54 pm
CameronNORML
May 30 2009, 9:25 pm
dcfball05
May 30 2009, 10:32 am
Bongbarian
May 28 2009, 10:39 am
So how is it that the morons & crackhead level con men run things? The inteligent people have either turned from the bullshit long ago & the rest have absorbed/insulated themselves w/daily life. So who does listen to these mental midgets for them to gain/retain power? Senor citiczens living in a day gone by, religious right w/its 'our way is the only way' or anyone w/predetermined thoughts/values, inability of free thought & the bitter/NASTY people. Weed clan saw thru the shit long ago, unfortunatly they walked away.
Cannibus- Is a financial black hole(law enforcement) intead of a CASH CROP, for the people as a Whole. Weed CAUSES NO CRIME & IS ACTUALLY A CRIME DETERENT. Herb relaxes & eases tensions of smokers- unless they are worried about the legal issues. Those that arnt are simply openly defiant, erroding the relationship between government & its people.
CAN ANY NON-SMOKER TELL THE TRUTH ANYMORE? CAN THESE PEOPLE ACKNOWLEDGE IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR OTHER PEOPLE TO BE DIFFERENT THAN THEY ARE? DOES ANY CURRENT DECISION MAKER HAVE THE BALLS TO MAKE SOMETHING POSITIVE & OUT OF THE BOX HAPPEN/WORK????
jj
May 28 2009, 9:46 am
John Walters it a biggot , liar , and a tyrant.
Obama is starting to look like a liar.
njkush23
May 27 2009, 7:34 pm
lilking26
May 27 2009, 11:02 am
dntwstwood
May 27 2009, 10:33 am
Thank you Professor Miron for getting in the ring with Mr.Walter's. Why he would do the same with you I am,20' later,still in deep depths of ponder.
GYO
Peace and Pot
niggaawhaaat
May 26 2009, 3:59 pm
God
May 26 2009, 2:13 pm
HU210
May 22 2009, 12:13 pm
Most people get suckered at their evaluation into admitting to a religious belief. Thinking that it will gain them favor with the evaluater. Big mistake.
See: Kerr v Farrey
Fight back!
God
May 22 2009, 6:00 am
umm
May 22 2009, 12:41 am
♥
ujmm
May 22 2009, 12:28 am
HU210
May 21 2009, 10:07 am
Just tell them. If you dont support that your god made weed, and made it for our usage. As your book "of truth" says. Then the book and that god is rejected.
The church is junk.
In weed we trust
HU210
May 21 2009, 9:31 am
I am trying to help someone to fight back and save time and money.
@ mind control
Sue the bastards if they are compelling you to partake of a religious service.
Thats Kerr v Farrey
Hope this helps
umm
May 21 2009, 9:12 am
Further, there is no such thing as atheism, cause everyone believe in the love of something, and love is god.
HU210
May 21 2009, 8:31 am
Is the treatment program that you are compelled to complete based on religion or the 12 steps?
If so. Know that they can not compell you to participate in a religious service. I sure saved myself alot of time and grief by being an atheist. (kerr v Frerry)
Most people get suckered at their evaluation into admitting to a religious belief.
umm to ?
May 21 2009, 12:01 am
♥
WTF !!
May 20 2009, 11:09 am
Doctor : ...................................
Czar : Treatment , treatment , treatment .....
Doctor : .....................................
???????????????????
yea , destroyed ain't quite the word I'd use for it either .
?
May 20 2009, 5:22 am
umm
May 20 2009, 1:02 am
umm
May 20 2009, 12:34 am
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ok
It appears that the term "OK" originally came from an English slang called "oll korrect" then they slanged the saying up to "OK meaning all correct.
Main Entry: OK
Variant(s):or okay
Function: adverb or adjective
Etymology: abbreviation of oll korrect, facetious alteration of all correct
Date:
1839
Thats the kind of stuff that I should have known, and maybe someone told me sometime in my life, but I just never really thought of the origin of OK, and thought that was kind of nifty to find out that after all it could be that I never even heard of that before.
:)
umm
May 20 2009, 12:03 am
♥
umm
May 19 2009, 1:54 pm
Professor Jeffrey Miron did a great job of retaining his composure and putting out the truth. The facts, and yet the feds think our freedoms have no economical value. I don't know how he did it as well as he did. There was just seconds to answer all the negative crap the prohibitionist put forth, and yet he was able to answer a few so well, that the prohibitionist did look like he didn't know what to say. Thats why the prohibitionists refuse a longer interview with knowledgeable people, cause the prohibitionists know they don't stand a chance.
umm
May 19 2009, 12:57 pm
Gerald Celente time.
Lets
May 19 2009, 12:44 pm
umm
May 19 2009, 12:41 pm
to
May 19 2009, 6:44 am
?
May 19 2009, 4:43 am
spicoli
May 18 2009, 11:34 pm
Huh ?
May 18 2009, 5:09 pm
ha ..somebody needs a dictionary .
legalmind control/usa
May 18 2009, 4:15 pm
I am currently being ordered by po via court to undergo
so called treatment 62.50 per session a guide/handbook
from 1986 cutting edge shit it is funny that john walters even mentioned the treatment thing considering that zero of the patients/CLIENTS ever wanted to jump through these dumbshit hoops in the 1st place. the name of the workbook in the TREATMENT class is
HOW TO ESCAPE YOUR PRISON luckily for us clients it only demands that we SEEM to be genuine about our goals
which of course are to carry on with our fucking lives and be done with the 900 dollar TREATMENT [THAT WE NEVER WANTED NOR NEEDED IN MOST CASES] plus the [supervision fees ua fees fees fees fees] what a joke im not laughing
Me
May 16 2009, 4:16 pm
HU210
May 16 2009, 8:45 am
First, many "old timers", at least older now, have been mining the info that you youngsters- now with lightning quick internet communication ability. Hopefully are using in your media venues to affect change in marijuana laws.
For 20+ years I have challenged anti-drug crusaders, using scientfic proof, by writing letters to the editors of many newspapers, most all of which were printed/published.(print media)
Unforunately, while cannabis consumers and others in my own social arena. Thought that what I was doing was not just cool. But also just. They still were to fearful to use the uncontreverted truths I had presented in said letters. To compose a letter and send to lawmakers.
Its not just fear that restrains them, but the genuine uncertanty
That said. I am glad that you are ready to take over the reigns. Be forewarnned. Its a very rough ride. It can cost you jobs. It can cost you friendships. Ruin family relationships. It can cost you time in jail/prison. It will cost you years of your life in the pursuit of legalization.
(very few spend 3 years at it, let alone 20 or more)
Legalization is not for the faint of heart or sunshine patriots.
I enjoy seeing your fresh enthusiasim. I am not as easily taken in by smothe talkers. I need to see their actions!= Obama
Enjoy the ride.
Teacher
May 15 2009, 11:55 am
If everyone joins NORML, MPP, DPA or whichever organization and donates money, weed will be legal sooner than we think. In Cali I bet it's legal in 2010!!!!!
HU210
May 15 2009, 8:37 am
The 'Briefing Book' tabulated Americans' online votes on over 44,000 different public policy questions. The proposals were posted on the Change.gov website (now whitehouse.gov) in January.
Some 125,000 Americans participated in the White Houses' online poll, casting over 1.4 million votes. Proposals were awarded ten points for each positive vote.
Based on the total number of points received, ending the criminal prohibition of marijuana ranked as the most popular issue, receiving 92,970 points. Halting the use of "federal resources to undermine states' medical marijuana laws" ranked as the third most popular issue, receiving 66,170 points.
In response to a similar White House online poll question in December 2008, a spokesperson for the Obama administration commented, "President ... Obama is not in favor of the legalization of marijuana."
Last week, a national Zogby poll of 3,937 voters commissioned by conservative-leaning O'Leary Report found that a slight majority of Americans – 52 percent – favor legalizing marijuana. The poll marks the first time that a majority of the public has expressed support for pot legalization in a nationwide telephone poll.
For more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director, at: (202) 483-5500
NORML.org
Legalization and justice for all ranked # 1.
Great job cannabis consumers!
budisgood
May 15 2009, 2:18 am
Time2Legalize
May 15 2009, 1:10 am
ARNOLD FOR PRESIDENT!!!! If a Muslim affiliate can be pres....another article perhaps.
The time has come to outgrow our old ways and usher in new and improved ways. The government unfortunately is over-flowing with over the hill officials who are from an era that see things their way and no other way!!
The legalization of marijuana is coming simply because it has too, nature put it here for a reason and we are not going to find that reason until it is legal. The 7 billion dollars spent on the battle of a natural substance could be better spent. (i.e. education, health-care etc) Obama must open his eyes and see this; education and health-care are his mule and cart in this term of presidency. If he is to have any hope of pulling his desires out of his butt he needs more money!! It is estimated that the legalization of marijuana could bring 6 billion annually!! Couple that with the 7 billion we spend on fighting a natural substance and you have 13 billion dollars to spend where we need it, THE PEOPLE!!
This country is in dire straits, we are losing money faster than we can get it, due to poor spending and government theft, yes theft...you know who you are!! The fact that this debate is even going this long makes me sad to be an American simply because we were (sadly, no longer) founded for the people. There is no other answer for the people, we are losing jobs due to poor economy which in turn puts people on the street and raises crime rate.
We the people need to step up and take hold of the reins here and TELL the government what we want..we are tired of being held by the hand and told we can't have a natural substance, something that nature/God put here for all of us!! Cocaine, Acid, Meth..that shit isn't natural and I would never support the legalization of such fowl substances but Marijuana has so many uses, some of which we will never learn unless legal. The private sector is responsible for a vast majority of advances in science and medicine and we can't fully understand this natural substance unless we are given FULL access to the substance!!
OBAMA AND THE REST OF YOU OLE TIMERS NEED TO STEP BACK AND REALIZE WE THE PEOPLE STILL RUN THIS COUNTRY AND WE ARE ASKING FOR THIS.
US citizen
May 15 2009, 12:17 am
Al
May 14 2009, 4:37 pm
all for it
May 14 2009, 4:03 pm
THC 4eva
May 14 2009, 2:57 pm
Get the facts so you can debate anti-pot folks on this issue!
From that article, (which you should all read):
Despite prohibitionist claims that the pot of the 1960s averaged under 1 percent THC—an allegation that, if true, would indicate that the entire Woodstock generation experienced nothing more than a giant placebo effect—US government researchers didn’t begin measuring marijuana potency until the early 1970s, when a team of investigators at the University of Mississippi received federal approval to initiate the Potency Monitoring Project.
Early samples tested by the PMP consisted almost entirely of old, improperly stored Mexican weed, infamous for its shitty quality. Varieties of more potent herb available on the commercial market, such as sinsemilla and Thai stick, were ignored by the project. As a result, the baseline data produced by the PMP during the early to mid-’70s—during which time federal researchers absurdly claimed that pot averaged less than 1.5 percent THC— bore little resemblance to the marijuana available on the actual consumer market of the time. Yet this hopelessly incomplete and misleading data continues to be cited by prohibitionists in the reports they release.
By the 1980s, law-enforcement officials from around the nation began directing samples of confiscated pot to U-Miss for quality testing, a practice that continues to this day. As the number of samples received by the PMP increased—from a few hundred in the early 1980s to several thousand by the mid-’90s—the reported potency of pot also began to increase, though hardly by the dramatic leaps claimed by anti-pot forces. In fact, a year-by-year assessment of PMP’s published data from 1982 through 2002 indicates that pot’s average THC content increased only marginally, from 4 percent to 6 percent, a jump in quality that’s arguably less than the difference between a cup of tea and an espresso.
According to numerous studies, the most significant difference between “kind bud” and schwag is that users of the former smoke far less per session than do users of the latter (much as consumers of high-potency liquor drink less volume per serving than do consumers of low-potency beer).
Specifically, a 1989 John Hopkins University study reported that cannabis users readily differentiate between pot strains of varying strength, taking “smaller puff and inhalation volumes and shorter puff duration for the high marijuana dose compared to the low dose.” Most recently, a 2007 University of California study assessing patterns of cannabis vaporization reported that users self-regulate their pot consumption based on the drug’s potency.
Hence, the stronger the herb, the less consumers inhale into their lungs. You’d think the Drug Czar would be celebrating.
HU210
May 14 2009, 2:15 pm
Hey president Obama. Go ahead and send more troops to Afganastan. America will learn- like the Russians did, not to mention the Brits before them- that before to long our troops will start deserting. Better to smoke hash with Afgan Tribesman, than to shoot it out with them and die there.
HU210
May 14 2009, 2:06 pm
Nothing new in that-eh?
ijit
May 14 2009, 12:53 pm
legalizer
May 14 2009, 11:53 am
umm
May 14 2009, 10:47 am
Love to the lovers of the greenery♥
WindzBreezy
May 14 2009, 10:18 am
The use of marijuana has been known to fight tumors with Cannabinoids. why fight it can we all just get along.lol.
umm
May 14 2009, 2:39 am
rdf0ster
May 13 2009, 11:55 pm
?
?
?
?
?
?
jim
May 13 2009, 9:01 pm
treehugger
May 13 2009, 2:05 pm
treehugger
May 13 2009, 1:59 pm
Arizonawing
May 13 2009, 1:45 pm
Paranoid
May 13 2009, 1:34 pm
corey
May 13 2009, 11:07 am
DGAF 4 eva
SweetPoison
May 13 2009, 8:51 am
I have been an off and on smoker for over 40 years and have not become addicted to weed and have not become psychotic or vilent when smoking. Let's counter with some real education
pennsylvania potter
May 12 2009, 9:58 pm
a few politicians want to pass a medical marijuana bill, house bill 1393, and i'm sure they could use all the help they can get! you know how conservative some of our pols are.. lets get behind this and make it happen..
gstlab3
May 12 2009, 8:11 pm
willllvn
May 12 2009, 6:02 pm
treehugger
May 12 2009, 4:50 pm
I'm sure what's in HT is world class, but not yet legal. Sooon in will be in Home Depot too (near the drill bits, behind the wall, where the register is always open-for-business) 24/7/365. Thanks to HT and all the growers keepin the species alive, a Nobel is forthcoming.
Inga
May 12 2009, 4:25 pm
treehugger
May 12 2009, 4:05 pm
That's why it's weird to hear of Seattle or Portland jus blazin. Cops not doin much, politics not doin much, economy not doin much, but they're pumpin out them 300 lb 6-year-olds steady.
Eddy
May 12 2009, 2:22 pm
First of all, what is it? is it 60% 70% or 80%? you are the former drug czar and you have been brought on the show to offer opposition to legalizing marijuana, you make yourself look incompetant by not having your statisitics in order. Secondly, "had drugs in their body." That doesnt mean that they were all marijuana users and it certainly doesnt mean they were high on marijuana at the time they commited the crime. If 60% of those people also were found to be black would it be fair to say that being black makes you commit violent crimes? Hell no! Thats totally anecdotal evidence. Then he said something about more violence and "part of that has to do with higher potency." Bullshit. The more potent the weed is the more lazy it will make you. I guarantee you that someone who sits back and smokes a half eigth of some super silver haze will not be robbing anyone anytime soon. That shows you how little people who have never smoked and are against marijuana actually understand it. Then he talked about more people using it. But it's been proven that less people use marijuana in Amsterdam than in neighboring European countries.
As far as Schwarzenegger, I am a huge fan of his (not politcally) and I respect the fact that he is open about his former pot use (I wonder if he would admit to it if they didn't actually have it on film) but it frustrates me when I hear him or others justifying marijuana use because "Oh, it was the '60s or the '70s." as if it was only o.k. to use it back then because lots of people were but its not o.k. now. Such bullshit.
all4the20
May 12 2009, 1:34 pm
Danny D Leagalize
May 12 2009, 1:13 pm
keep it kali
May 12 2009, 12:55 pm
treehugger
May 12 2009, 12:53 pm
Save a cop, grow a plant, pay the tax! on what you sell. Shit, just send it now, don't wait for them to ask - send them 1/6, and label it NORML american payin their taxes. And build a canal 100' deep X 100 yards wide from Brownsville to Baja. Instant border control, and no need to waste the gas goin through Panama.
Just Smoked
May 12 2009, 12:26 pm
truth
May 12 2009, 12:11 pm
granddaddypurp
May 12 2009, 12:04 pm
Just Smoked
May 12 2009, 12:03 pm
chromulan
May 12 2009, 11:39 am
moldy
May 12 2009, 11:03 am
c low
May 12 2009, 10:43 am
moldy
May 12 2009, 10:31 am
LiL FaZz
May 12 2009, 9:45 am
Putting a tax on marijuana will lower the death rate from the other substances. Because marijuana calms you down as people would say the same for other drugs, but marijuana has a smell therefore people turn to other harder drugs so that it wont stink up their house and they wont get caught.
Everybody has stress in their lives, putting an age and a tax on marijuana will make a whole lot of less stress in America.
And because the stuff is much more potient now then back then, people wont have to turn to other drugs like cocaine or herion, beacuse they can calm their anxiety by using marijuana people wont have to become addicted to other substances.
stoneyrepublican
May 12 2009, 8:45 am
stoneyrepublican
May 12 2009, 8:07 am
HEY HANKIE
May 12 2009, 2:27 am
So why would Pres. Obama care if hateful intolerant people were upset that they no longer had the right to steal and rob from us otherwise average people?
Hemp Knight
May 12 2009, 2:02 am
No matter what,they'll get a good deal of money from it being legal,their just thinking of it all wrong,if their thinking what I'm thinking they're thinking anyways.
But seriously,if California manages to legalise,I think alot of other places in the country will start trying harder to lift the ban too.
grassakate
May 12 2009, 1:26 am
Just Smoked
May 12 2009, 1:22 am
Damn i mean everyday i here on the "news" how some teen got alcohol poisoning and was hoslpitalized oR there was a bad fight and someone died or a drunk driver cause an accident or killed someone.
Really now what the hell?!
Phoenix Guy
May 12 2009, 1:12 am
I've Owen a tobacco shop in Iowa for 16 years and people respect my shop,My shop is a peaceful domain unlike the the bars around here,There's always fights going on every night.Also I would be crippled with out the herb,do to the arthritis in my hands and knees.Thank the gods for the Herb!PEACE!!
This is the future...
May 12 2009, 12:31 am
The prohibitionists think that the money we're spending on the war on drugs is worth it. Why? Because if it is legalized, there will be more users.
I have morals too! I morally believe that I should be growing and selling pot for my own profit. WHY DO THE STREET DEALERS GET ALL THE MONAY!
All I see here, is the same old bullshit that we've all heard our whole lives. I truly believe that it will be this generation that forgets the propaganda and legalizes pot.
T.NAS
May 12 2009, 12:12 am
ridinhigh
May 12 2009, 12:08 am
Arson
May 12 2009, 12:03 am
He bases all information on irrational, random events
Weed doesnt cause violence, prohibition does
How are you gonna stop someone from stealing your whole sack? Obviously not through the government/courts cuz theyll just throw you in jail
Thats where the violence comes from
trimoloks
May 11 2009, 11:51 pm
Jorgi
May 11 2009, 11:46 pm
AndE
May 11 2009, 11:35 pm
Cameron
May 11 2009, 11:33 pm
mike
May 11 2009, 11:30 pm
40sac
May 11 2009, 11:21 pm
rukidding
May 11 2009, 11:14 pm
joecamel
May 11 2009, 11:10 pm
FilthyJoe
May 11 2009, 11:02 pm
just me
May 11 2009, 10:57 pm
RevWildflower
May 11 2009, 10:53 pm
skeetsxtc
May 11 2009, 10:49 pm
BREAKDOWN!!!
imagine
May 11 2009, 10:48 pm
MiStA bLa
May 11 2009, 10:20 pm
Rick
May 11 2009, 10:18 pm
Yes, marijuana cures certain types of cancer but we haven’t begun to discover it’s full potential benefits to be derived in the future. Speak to your State representatives, tell them you elect to choose life via medicinal marijuana products and to voice your concerns in the State and Federal Courts. “Legalize to Save Lives.”
Boudieman
May 11 2009, 10:09 pm
treehugger
May 11 2009, 8:29 pm
treehugger
May 11 2009, 8:27 pm
gstlab3
May 11 2009, 8:18 pm
Im deaf
May 11 2009, 7:53 pm
DBake
May 11 2009, 7:23 pm
http://www.limelinx.com/files/45d0903bfc1e3bfda7d7122152b39166
Pro-Weed
May 11 2009, 7:11 pm
treehugger
May 11 2009, 5:22 pm
Reality Check
May 11 2009, 5:01 pm
"destroyed " .. not in this particular instance .Fairly lame describes it better .
treehugger
May 11 2009, 4:39 pm
treehugger
May 11 2009, 4:29 pm
americanstoner
May 11 2009, 4:18 pm
Common Sense
May 11 2009, 3:53 pm
Not even close .
With all that talk about "addiction " and " treatment " that was NEVER questioned ? Nope .
This "debate " ( and I use the term reluctantly ) hasn't provided anything substantial for one side or the other .
At best , some may have found it entertaining , but "desroyed " ? Thats just to let people (who can't think for themselves )know what they are supposed to think . NO THANKS .
casual user
May 11 2009, 3:48 pm
Business as usual
May 11 2009, 3:10 pm
don't have any real facts to present,they instead fall back on their manufactured and structured facts,which are too easy to
discredit. For every study that says pot is addictive,there are
3 that says it isn't. Where a study says that marijuana is a
gateway drug,there are dozens that say it isn't. And the list goes on for every anti-drug slogan they can come up with.
And the problem won't just go away. They can laugh at us,call
us trolls,and insult our intelligence with their stupid arguments,but they can't stop people wanting to increase the
pleasure in their lives.
Screw them,grow your own,and when these same clowns run for re-election,please don't vote for them.
SICK AND TIRED
May 11 2009, 3:01 pm
Jeffery shut him down on every point he tried to bring up
and Obama should be ashamed
I felt let down when he laughed about the question he was asked he could of just answered respectfully
OBAMA IS FAKE
treehugger
May 11 2009, 2:36 pm
But did you hear, "..it has been re-engineered to be stronger"? This ain't your granddads schwagg. Give me a million, and some DNA sequencers, please....
stoneyrepublican
May 11 2009, 1:20 pm
toker
May 11 2009, 1:19 pm
according to Mr Walters San Francisco should be going to hell in a hand basket.
just because alcohol is legal does not mean more people want to be raging alcoholics, I know I could get drunk faster with whiskey but I would much rather drink a beer which has less alcohol in it, it's called moderation, Mr Walters thinks that grown up men don't have the ability to exercise any type of control over their own actions, and no matter how much bud you smoke you could never get so wasted you will piss in your own pants like some alcoholics do. Silly.
pimp money
May 11 2009, 1:10 pm
mop46n2
May 11 2009, 12:58 pm
» add a comment