There’s really no rational reason to cut Medicare. But what does this have to do with urine testing? Bear with us, we’re getting there.
America’s limited single-payer healthcare option, available to older and disabled Americans, Medicare provides some form of healthcare to 55 million people. That’s nice, surely—but more to the point, it generates serious profits for the country’s healthcare-industrial complex.
Medicare accounts for about 30 percent of the country’s colossal prescription drug spending, a habit projected to exceed $610 billion a year by 2021. One need not be so ambitious or sophisticated to find a rich vein to tap.
The urine-testing factory at Comprehensive Pain Specialists, a drug-screening lab near Nashville, is possibly America’s busiest, but it’s merely one cog in a massive effluvia-examining machine. Between 2011 and 2014, according to researchers with KHN and the Mayo Clinic, Americans spent $8.5 billion a year on urine analysis—an increase of 400 percent during that time period. Medicaid paid for fewer than two million urine tests in 2009, according to data. By 2014, that number had ballooned to nearly 20 million.
(Remember what else has quadrupled in recent history? Opiate painkiller prescriptions. And the two are connected: One way CPS justifies its pee business is the high prescription rates of opiates in the states it services.)
Put into perspective, America spends more on testing pee than it does on the entire Environmental Protection Agency. As KHN reported: “The federal government paid providers more to conduct urine drug tests in 2014 than it spent on the four most recommended cancer screenings combined.”
So what do we get for all this time and effort?
Forgive us, but piddly-squat.
There are no accepted national standards for urine analysis—meaning who gets tested and for what varies wildly. Doctors say that urine testing is necessary to safely prescribe drugs, but “tens of millions of dollars” are spent on screening for drugs that pose a “minimal abuse danger.” More is spent on screening for rare street drugs like PCP. Even more common recreational drugs like cocaine and ecstasy are found “just one percent of the time,” yet they’re included in the urine analysis tests run.
Because it’s lucrative. If you run a pain clinic, you can make your monthly nut by testing for urine—and then some.
“Thirty-one pain practitioners received 80 percent or more of their Medicare income just from urine testing,” KHN reported.
Those are only the most egregious examples of a system where gangs of doctors make more money testing their patients than they do treating them.
It’s also an obvious hustle.
More than 700 urine samples from all over the southeast are received every day at CPS in Tennessee, which may store the urine for as long as a month before it can be run through sophisticated machinery. All this infrastructure is costly—and probably not necessary. Most drug test screening can be done with a $10 kit that includes the following equipment: A cup to pee in and a testing strip that shows what drugs are present within minutes.
But as KHN discovered, once doctors and clinics found it difficult to justify huge bills for these simple screenings, they switched to the machines—and started charging more, and more often. One pain clinic argued in 2008 that patients should be screened for drug use as often as once a week. Why not, when each machine test, KHN noted, can be billed individual to Medicaid.
Charles Root, a lab industry consultant, called it “almost a license to steal.”
The obvious takeaway is that an incredible amount of money is being literally pissed away on screenings that accomplish nothing aside from fulfilling a profit motive. The other point to remember is that this is all legal.
There aren’t federal standards on what to test, how often or through which method. In 2016, Medicaid did begin a “crackdown on urine billing” as part of a review that reset lab fees for the first time in years—but pee tests are still a large part of the business plans of CPS and other clinics. Until the feds step in, the profits will keep flowing.
What’s in Your Stash? Autumn Saylor, Stay-at-Home Mom, Treating PTSD With Cannabis
Study Finds Legal Cannabis Reduces Illicit Grows in National Forests
Someone Planted 34 Cannabis Plants in the Vermont Statehouse Flower Beds
New Bill Ensures Some Retroactive Drug War Justice for New Hampshire
House Votes to Protect States With Legal Marijuana From Feds
Two Plead Guilty to Using United States Postal Service to Traffic Marijuana
Honoring the Legend: Jack Herer
Raid of Massive Illegal Cannabis Grow Site in California Took Four Days to Complete
News5 days ago
What Was Said at Today’s Congressional Hearing on Federal Marijuana Law Reform
Health6 days ago
The Pechoti Method: Can You Put Weed in Your Belly Button?
News6 days ago
New Subscription Service Ships Concentrates Directly to Consumers
Entertainment6 days ago
Jay-Z Announces Partnership With Top Cannabis Company Caliva
News3 days ago
Coast Guard Busts Submarine Carrying Over $500 Million Worth of Cocaine, Weed
News4 days ago
Florida Court Rules Medical Marijuana Licensing Law Unconstitutional
Health5 days ago
Cannabis and Mental Health: Schizophrenia
News5 days ago
Hawaii Officially Decriminalizes Small Quantities of Cannabis