WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is placing new limits on the government’s ability to seize assets from people who are convicted of drug crimes but receive little of the illegal proceeds.
The unanimous ruling on Monday comes as the Justice Department has moved to impose harsher punishments for drug trafficking and related crimes, reversing Obama-era policies.
The case involved a Tennessee man convicted for his role selling iodine water purification filters to methamphetamine makers. Terry Honeycutt helped sell more than 20,000 filters at his brother’s hardware store and prosecutors said both brothers knew the iodine was used by local meth cooks.
Honeycutt’s brother pleaded guilty and forfeited $200,000 of the $270,000 in profits. The government tried to get the remaining $70,000 from Honeycutt, but he argued that he wasn’t responsible for it since he didn’t personally see any profits from the scheme.
A federal appeals court ruled against Honeycutt, agreeing with prosecutors that each brother bore the full responsibility for the entire amount.
But Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in her opinion for the high court that forfeiture laws are “limited to property the defendant himself actually acquired as the result of the crime.”
She cited as an example a case in which a marijuana farmer masterminds a scheme to sell pot on college campuses and recruits a college student to deliver the packages for $300 a month. In her example, the farmer might earn $3 million in a year, while the student earns $3,600. She said under the government’s theory, the student could face a forfeiture judgment for the entire conspiracy amount of $3 million.
“Congress did not authorize the government to confiscate substitute property from other defendants or coconspirators,” Sotomayor said. “It authorized the government to confiscate assets only from the defendant who initially acquired the property and who bears responsibility for its dissipation.”
The ruling is the latest effort by the high court to limit perceived overreaching by federal prosecutors, said John Marti, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
“In short, federal criminal statutes and forfeiture statutes are not blank checks for prosecutors,” Marti said.
FBI Data Shows Cannabis Arrests are on the Rise for Second Year in a Row
Activists in Oregon Fight for the Public Consumption of Cannabis on 2019 Ballot
Thai Police Give Researchers 220 Pounds Of Seized Marijuana
Police in Massachusetts Make Super Troopers Reference After Recovering Two Pounds of Weed
Malaysian Court Sentences Man to Death for Distributing Free Cannabis Oil
Canadian Dispensary Clerk Fights off Three Burglars With a Giant Bong
Hot Pot Products: 4 Must-Haves for Cannabis Cultivators
Study Suggests CBD May Have Antipsychotic Effect in High-Risk Individuals
Guides7 days ago
What Do The Colors of Marijuana Mean?
Celebrities6 days ago
Kristen Bell Opens Up About Weekly Cannabis Use and Exploring Other Drugs
Strains5 days ago
9 Colorful Weed Strains To Brighten Your Day
News5 days ago
First Clinical Trial of MDMA Treatment for Autistic Adults Sees Success
News6 days ago
New Report Says Concentrates are the Fast Growing Favorite Among Consumers
News5 days ago
Study Finds Magic Mushrooms Could Aid in Smoking Cessation
Dispensaries5 days ago
First Medical Cannabis Dispensary Set to Open in Brooklyn By End of Year
News4 days ago
Canada Estimates $1 Billion in Legal Cannabis Sales in First Three Months