Kentucky Senate Passes Medical Pot Legalization Bill

The Kentucky state Senate gave its bipartisan approval to a bill to legalize medical marijuana.
Kentucky
Shutterstock

The Kentucky Senate on Thursday passed a bill to legalize medical marijuana after years of work by lawmakers and activists. The Senate approved the measure, Senate Bill 47, by a bipartisan vote of 26-11. The legislation will now head to the state House of Representatives, where similar bills to legalize medical marijuana were passed twice in recent years.

Republican Senator Stephen West, a lead sponsor of the bill who has worked to legalize medical marijuana in Kentucky for five years, said that the legislation will give patients with serious medical conditions new options in treatment.

“It’s time for Kentucky to join the other 37 states that allow medical marijuana as an option for their citizens,” West said, adding that those who use cannabis medicinally should be able to do so “without being considered a criminal.”

If passed, Senate Bill 47 would permit patients aged 18 and up with certain qualifying medical conditions including cancer, chronic pain, epilepsy and post-traumatic stress disorder to obtain a doctor’s recommendation to use medical marijuana. The new Kentucky Center for Cannabis at the University of Kentucky, which opened in September of last year, can add additional qualifying conditions if it determines through data and research that patients with the condition are “likely to receive medical, therapeutic, or palliative benefits from the use of medicinal cannabis.”

The bill does not allow patients to smoke cannabis, although it does allow for the sale of raw cannabis flower for vaporization. Other cannabis formulations including capsules, tinctures and topical products are also authorized by the bill. 

Bill Contains Medical Cannabis Regulation Provisions

SB 47 tasks the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services with drafting and implementing regulations to enact the legislation and regulate the production and sale of medical marijuana in the state. The legislation does not include provisions allowing patients to cultivate medical marijuana at home. 

Senate Majority Floor Leader Damon Thayer was one of eight senators on the Senate Licensing and Occupations Committee who voted in favor of advancing Senate Bill 47 on March 14. Previously a staunch opponent of legalizing medical marijuana in Kentucky, Thayer recently suggested that his views on the issue are evolving after hearing testimonials from constituents. He told his colleagues on the committee that he voted “for the sake of those who suffer.”

“It’s not very often I change my mind,” Thayer said after the committee voted to advance the bill. “I did on industrial hemp and I did today on medical marijuana. I’m just trying to be a little more empathetic in my old age.”

Senate Bill 47 now heads to the Kentucky House of Representatives, where lawmakers have approved previous measures to legalize medical marijuana twice since 2020. If passed by the full legislature, the bill will be sent to Democratic Governor Andy Beshear, who has repeatedly called on the state legislature to pass medical marijuana legislation.

In June 2022, the governor announced that he was establishing a medical cannabis advisory committee to explore creating a path to legalization. In November, Beshear issued an executive order that decriminalized medical marijuana for patients with specified qualifying conditions. And in January, he repeated his call for state lawmakers to send him a medical marijuana legalization bill in 2023.

Eric Crawford, an activist who has worked to legalize medical marijuana in Kentucky for a decade, shared his surprise after Thursday’s vote by the Senate.

“I’m shocked,” said Crawford. “Now it’s time for the House.”

Under the bill, Kentucky’s medical cannabis program would launch by January 2025. Crawford, who was paralyzed in a vehicle accident 30 years ago, says that cannabis is the only medicine that effectively treats the pain and muscle spasms he endures as a result of the catastrophic injury. Although he has nearly two years before Senate Bill 47 goes into effect, Crawford said that he understands the delay.

“I figured it was gonna take that long to set up the system that we didn’t have,” Crawford said. “Yeah, it’s a long hard wait, but I’m doing what I gotta do.”

Total
0
Shares
10 comments
  1. Whoop tea doo They are finding the way out of the deep dark backwoods The next thing you know everybody will have shoes.

    1. You are a moron!!! Evidently you have never watched a family suffer from Parkinson’s with dementia. This is the only thing that helped before she died. And whoop dee Doo we have shoes you sicko!!! Something very horrible will happen to you or someone you love in your lifetime for being so cruel and demeaning. Get a life!!!

      1. I am 100% for the federal and state legalization of cannabis. Please vote for the passage of any and all legalization

  2. All of Indiana’s border states have legalized medical cannabis. As an Indiana resident I feel uncomfortable about this. I can accept decisions I don’t agree with through understanding. I can’t understand this.

    1. To be clear, I’m uncomfortable about Indiana lawmakers refusing to move forward in unity with its neighbors on a major issue. We need unity.

  3. Also to be clear my post is directed toward Warren Gregoires ignorant insulting comment!! Just rude!! I’ve seen, dealt with and lost my mother in law to a horrible disease and cannabis was the only thing that helped before her last days. Way to go a senate for finally seeing this plant helps people’s lives in so many ways where traditional prescription meds do not.

  4. Executive Order 2022-798 is entrapment. It promises a full, complete, and conditional pardon to all persons who after the effective date of this order are accused of possession of marijuana under KRS 218A.1422 if and only if all of the conditions are satisfied. Which goes on to clearly state and basically prove that someone committing a state level misdemeanor charge of possession will receive a full pardon for the state level misdemeanor IF they provide proof that they committed a federal level crime. Crossing state lines while in possession of marijuana is considered to be a federal charge of trafficking in marijuana, which is a much more serious charge than the charge being pardoned by the executive order.
    It states that if someone found to be in possession of marijuana or committing a misdemeanor possession charge for marijuana will be pardoned if they provide a receipt that proves they crossed state lines while in possession of marijuana, which in itself is a federal crime. The advisory board established by the Ky state governor (Team Kentucky Medical Cannabis Executive Advisory Committee) makes it clear on their faqs page of their webpage ( https://medicalcannabis.ky.gov/) that a federal crime is not covered by the pardon offered by the governor in the executive order. But yet, a federal crime is proven by having proof or receipt for purchasing the marijuana outside of Kentucky, and then crossed back into Kentucky where at this point a state level misdemeanor crime of possession is committed; but the deception of believing in a full pardon for the state level crime is creating the illusion that they will be pardoned for the federal crime of crossing state lines while in possession of marijuana.
    Therefore, the executive order is basically offering to pardon anyone for a state level misdemeanor if they provide authorities with clear evidence that they have committed a more serious federal crime that is not covered by the pardon stated in the executive order; and as such is a perfect example of entrapment. The executive order is deceiving people into committing a crime while under the illusion of believing that they will be pardoned. But the only charge they will be pardoned on is a lesser state level charge, instead of the federal crime that they are being told to provide evidence of committing. In other words, it is convincing people to believe they will receive a full pardon for committing a state level crime, but in fact is requiring people to provide proof that they actually committed a higher level federal crime instead of what is covered by the pardon.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Total
0
Share