Let’s say you owned a dispensary or other pot-related business in one of the 23 states with legal adult-use or medical marijuana and wanted to advertise your merchandise in a newspaper or magazine.
Think twice—because your ad would be in violation of federal law. And the publishers who accept such ads may also be exposed to prosecution.
You would think a more coordinated effort between states and the federal government would be an improvement over current policies and the failed War on Drugs that has resulted in the U.S. having the highest incarceration rate in the world.
Last week, Forbes reported that eight congress members asked U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch to reassure newspaper publishers that they won’t be prosecuted for accepting pot ads and to clarify how the Department of Justice will respond when the U.S. Postal Service refers newspapers, with such ads in them, to her office.
In other words, refrain from prosecuting individuals “who are placing advertisements for marijuana products in accordance with state law.”
When State Law Collides with Federal Law
While states are treating marijuana businesses as legitimate, the federal government still sees them as criminal enterprises, which is why banks are so reluctant to accept their money.
For newspapers and magazines, there is an additional concern—the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) makes it a felony and punishable by up to four years in prison to “place in any newspaper, magazine, handbill, or other publications, any written advertisement knowing that it has the purpose of seeking or offering illegally to receive, buy, or distribute a Schedule I controlled substance.”
In issues that are supposed to be decided by states, such as gay marriage and medical and recreational marijuana, one would assume that state law rules. However, you’d be wrong. A federal law applies to the nation as a whole and to all 50 states, whereas state laws are only in effect within that particular state.
If a state law gives people more rights than a federal law, the state law is legally supposed to prevail, which means state law will always supersede federal law when the person in question stands to gain more from the state law, right?
If a federal regulation prohibits the use of medical marijuana, but a state regulation allows it, the federal law prevails.
This begs the question: Why, when 58 percent of the country backs legalization for a third straight year, according to Gallup, is the federal government standing in the way of states rights?
President Obama, feel free to comment.
(Photo Courtesy of Inquisitr)
Greece Issues First Licenses to Produce Medical Cannabis
Inside Aurora Cannabis: The World’s Biggest Grow
The Ultimate Guide for Black Friday and Cyber Monday
New Jersey Lawmakers Will Soon Vote on Legalizing Recreational Weed
Our 10 Favorite Canadian Legalization Tweets and Memes
Snoop Dogg Smokes a Blunt in Front of the White House to Protest Trump
The Yin and Yang of Pot: Why CBD Oil and THC Are Better Together
Mike Tyson is Starting a TV Show About His Life as a Cannabis Grower
News7 days ago
Federal Government Seeks Cultivators to Grow Thousands of Kilos of Cannabis
Legalization5 days ago
The IRS is Reportedly Overwhelmed by Cash Payments from Marijuana Businesses
News5 days ago
Doctor Who Uses Medical Marijuana Sues After Being Denied a Gun
Celebrities7 days ago
Norman Reedus Raising Money for Children Using Medical Cannabis
News7 days ago
Oklahoma Approves Over 12,000 Medical Marijuana Licenses
Culture6 days ago
Weed Scams are Trending on Instagram—and People are Falling for Them
News6 days ago
Healthcare Networks in Ohio Prohibit Doctors from Recommending Medical Cannabis
News7 days ago
House Reps. Announce Trio of Bills to Make VA More 420-Friendly for Veterans