Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

High Times


Supreme Court to Hear Key Drug Forfeiture Case  

drug court, drug offender, pot prisoner, marijuana arrest
Photo by Dan Skye

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could set limits on the federal government’s sweeping powers to seize property in drug cases under criminal forfeiture laws.

Tony and Terry Honeycutt were charged with federal drug offenses after selling quantities of iodine-based water disinfectant at their camping and hunting store in Chattanooga—because the substance can also be used in the manufacture of methamphetamine. Tony, the actual owner of the store, pleaded guilty, and had $200,000 seized—the amount believed equivalent to his proceeds from the sales of the chemical. Terry fought the charge, and lost. The government then sought an additional $70,000 from him. In Honeycutt v. United States, Terry is arguing that he is not liable for the proceeds because he wasn’t an owner of the store.

The local district court agreed that Terry should not have to pay, but this was overturned by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, which held that “joint and several liability” applies in drug forfeiture cases. In other words, as a co-conspirator he could be held liable for the proceeds even if he never saw a penny of them.

The federal government acknowledged that the appeals courts have been divided on the question presented by Terry’s case—but nonetheless urged the Supreme Court justices to deny review, saying that the split among the circuit courts is “lopsided and recent.” Disregarding these arguments, the high court agreed to hear the case. It will likely be argued in the spring, with a decision expected in June. The outcome, of course, will almost certainly hinge on the “swing vote” seat on the Supreme Court to be appointed by the incoming president.

Check in daily for all of  HIGH TIMES’ marijuana news.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


HT Newsletter

Subscribe for exclusive access to deals, free giveaways and more!

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.


You May Also Like


Lawmakers in New Mexico are seeing prospects for economic development in the state's rural farming communities.


In February, health officials banned restaurants and cafes in New York City from selling edibles with CBD. Today, businesses in the city are still...


Senate Bill 305 would allow terminally ill patients in California to use medical cannabis in hospitals, while Senate Bill 34 would allow licensed dispensaries...


The massive inflatable joint displayed the words, “Congress, Pass the Joint!”


Maryland Democrat and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer wants to put the SAFE Banking Act to a vote by the end of the month.


While there's still not enough support for parents under investigation by CPS, there is some hope now.


Federal prosecutors may pick up cannabis cases not pursued by the state.


In the United States, we have this thing called the Civil Asset Forfeiture Program. Basically, law enforcement can confiscate your property.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!