Standards, Not as High as We Are

We need true connoisseurs, people driven not by money and not by clout, but by a dedication to their craft.
Grown by Snowtill, shot by Ginja club

Edited by Lori Arden

A Gap in the Industry

When we look at other industries, from wine to fine dining, there are rigorous standards in place that allow for a clearly defined spectrum of desirability: the higher-end is easily discernable from the lower, and if not, there are trusted professionals who can differentiate for us. Establishing categories around quality not only helps us create better products, it facilitates a process by which people can study, discuss, and uplift their industry as a whole. 

For too long, cannabis has remained an insider’s game, with plugs and self-proclaimed experts defining trends by capitalizing on hype without due consideration to quality. It’s time for us as an industry to elevate ourselves—not just by getting high, but by adding a layer of sophistication that can increase our appeal by encouraging mainstream accessibility and acceptance worldwide. 

How Did We Get Here?

Well to be frank: money. Livelihoods are built on opinion, and the persistence of certain opinions has generated quite a lot of income in our industry. For example: let’s say a buyer acquires a pound of purple weed that, besides its coveted color, has little potency, resin content, or terpenes. Naturally the buyer will hype the color as the bud’s telltale sign of quality to push their product on consumers, even when these markers of desirability have zero to do with the actual quality of what’s being offered. 

Now that’s the small-time broker I refer to, but even more dangerous are the mega-suppliers who end up doing the same thing. Their play is obvious: where quality is lacking, use hype to fill the gap. Grow purple bud that lacks on every other metric, but decree that purple is best and if it’s za it has to be dark. 

In this vicious cycle of guileful growers and cunning plugs determining what’s in style, cannabis becomes akin to quick and cheap fashion, where the latest trend is king and quality the court jester.

Grown by Snowtill, shot by Ginja club

Mock Standardization

Currently the industry hides behind two sources of standards: lab testing with rocket-high THC percentages and the previously mentioned self-proclaimed gurus who prop up hype and spread myths. 

When it comes to THC percentages, consumers will tend to gravitate towards higher numbers, seeing those numbers as guarantees of quality. But here’s the thing: the amount of THC in a given strain as determined by lab testing is not a good metric of potency. I have, for instance, come across strains that have tested as low as 14% THC with terpene contents breaking the 5% whose effects will floor a seasoned smoker, while others that have tested at 30%+ impart a far less visceral high. 

At the same time, the desire to achieve those higher and higher measures of THC introduces a whole other kettle of fish: THC additives in the post production process that are now streamlined into products to increase the bud’s testing. You’d be shocked to see the amount of distillate and CRC sprayed and soaked onto flowers and joints across the market.

But lab-tested potency alone isn’t enough; it has to be propped up by a healthy dose of hype, conveniently provided by our so-called “gurus,” a never-ending march of clout-chasers standing in line for the mic, lying in wait for their 15 minutes of fame. Cop a flashy IG handle and spout some opinions, and suddenly you’re a consultant, expert, or critic on all the finer things cannabis-related. Yet I’ve seen a total lack of willingness on the part of so many of these individuals to make the true sacrifice needed to be an authentic and accurate critic, requirements we’ll discuss later on in the article.

Grown by Snowtill, shot by Ginja club

With Fractured Standards In Place, Myths Abound 


Let’s start with the color of the cannabis, something we touched on briefly with those pretty purps without potency. For years we’ve already seen major market shifts based solely on how the bud looks from a color perspective. I mean I get it—color’s great. I like a wide variety of colors in my fruits and veggies, but while a purple sweet potato is cool, there’s no denying orange ones are delicious too. It’s all a matter of aesthetic preference. And if we’re really talking about the visually striking aspect of a cannabis flower, there are metrics far more indicative of the plant’s health and quality of growth then simply the color—such as dense resin content, large trichome heads, and trim quality.

In certain cases buds that are in fact meant to be green, such as OG’s, are turned darker on purpose in order to achieve those lucrative shades, with incorrect room temperatures and environmental settings actually stressing out the plant. This ironically ends up rendering them of lesser quality than the same strain grown to its proper potential and color. Not to say, of course, there aren’t naturally occurring darker buds that are delicious, tasty, and gorgeous to look at. But again it’s a preference; the bottom line is that color isn’t a tell-tale sign of anything at all, really. 


Density of buds is the next issue at hand. The amount of times I’ve witnessed ignorance around how bud density is a sign of its quality is astounding. I’d say genetics is the most important factor for bud density, and while a strain that’s meant to be dense but comes out fluffy is a sign of poor growth and quality, there are many strains that simply aren’t dense at all but can still be some of the highest quality cannabis around. In fact I’d say that a strain that was meant to have a little bit of a looser structure but is instead hard as a rock can be a sign that a heavy amount of PGR (plant growth regulator) hormones are being used, which decreases the quality of that strain in spite of its newfound density. 


And finally, the myth to end all myths: ash color, which, along with pretty much everything ash-related, will from here on out be known as General Custy’s Last Stand. It’s truly one of the most ill-informed myths, and yet it’s the hill the biggest mob of pot bros have chosen to die on, spouting their ash-related views with the conviction of a scientific expert.

But here’s the truth: decades ago, Big Tobacco decided they needed to whitewash their cancer-causing poison, choosing to formulate the perfect chemical additives that, when put into cigarettes, would make their ash burn nice and white. Because of course white equals pure equals clean equals not the thing that killed your grandpa or your Great Uncle Bob. 

And clearly these Big Tobacco folk know where the real za is, because this silliness has infiltrated our industry with a vengeance that’s been hard to shake. All too often we hear white-ash diehards demonizing a darker burning bud, claiming the dark ash means it wasn’t flushed properly, cured correctly, has too many heavy metals, and so many more absurd notions. Ash color has far more to do with the mineral content absorbed by each plant and temperature at which the flower burns, and that differs from strain to strain. 

That’s all there is to it: ash color is an aesthetic preference and not, as the diehards want you to believe, a statement on quality. 

The Path Forward

So what’s the cure for all that ails us? 

Connoisseurship. Real pot critics. Most importantly, people who are willing to create systems in place to truly put quality to the test. Smoking 50+ blunts at a Cannabis Cup and then saying you know what’s fire is a pretty flimsy claim to expertise. What we need, instead, is the opposite: people who are passionate about cannabis and its effects but are willing to sacrifice immediate and frequent highs in favor of spreading out experiences. Basically, we need people who have the ability to actually differentiate. You can’t fill a cup of water that’s already full, just like you can’t properly test cannabis when you don’t know if it’s the 10th or 12th joint of the evening.

Just as food critics must maintain sensitive and broad palates, and sommeliers spit out sips and clear their taste buds between wines, true cannabis critics need to find ways of consumption that maximize their ability to evaluate flavor and effects. 

This ultimately would mean less over-consumption and more meaningful and intentional habits, ones that emulate the highest standards of any professional attempting to bring forth the finer notes and nuances of their subject, the product they’re testing. We need experts willing to study the broadest spectrum of terpenes, their individual flavors, and how these terpenes affect the mind, body, and spirit; how they interact with one another, and how they mix with different levels and types of cannabinoids. 

The days of linear and narrow evaluations (think indica versus sativa) will hopefully come to an end, and truly unique and specific experiences can be coaxed out of the cannabis world to elevate it in ways we couldn’t even dream of. Imagine the perfect visual and auditory sequences mixed with impeccable strain selections, grown as well as can be, bringing out next-level experiences for people who love cannabis (not to mention providing professional and safe introductions to newcomers who might be curious but scared). 

Such an aim toward curation and appreciation centered around standardized quality would bring on a paradigm shift in the cannabis world, one that would benefit all who consume this lovely plant. 

Grown by Snowtill, shot by Ginja club

How Connoisseurship Would Shape Consumer Choices

Once these true connoisseurs start coming out of the woodwork and gaining their well-deserved notoriety, I believe they’ll have the power to shift consumer choices in a major way. At this given moment the cannabis world is a fickle fiend, endlessly flip-flopping between OG’s and purples, fruit and gas, gas and candy, candy and funk, and so on and so forth. The trends come and go, and what’s popular is far from a statement on quality. As with fast fashion, the quality of the fabric—or in this case, the bud—isn’t in question, but rather concern with what’s in style (aka the strain of the month). 

Just as in the worlds of wine and fine dining, cannabis must prioritize quality over popularity. Regardless of whether it’s a steak or a bottle of wine, if the chef or winemaker excels at their craft, then what they do becomes less important than the way they do it. Quality and the expertise that produces it becomes key. So for analogy’s sake, just like you’d get the chicken (let’s say OG) from the Michelin-starred restaurant vs the ribeye (let’s say Runtz) from the chain-run steakhouse next door, you’d hopefully be able to pick your cannabis in a similar manner. Knowing that even though you love Runtz, that OG grown by the Michelin-starred producer would be an experience worth remembering.

In the end, tastes and minds will expand, with consumers picking their strains not just because it’s a flavor they like, but as well because of the source and the way it was grown. Too often I see people fall back on reductionism when they talk about genetics, thinking since they’ve tried a strain once they now know whether it’s good or not. But in fact if you consume two identical phenotypes from two different cultivators, they can express so differently it’s like consuming two different products altogether. 

With the advent of the true pot critic will rise the true chefs of the industry. Consumers will better be able to gauge quality outside of the “oh that strain’s good I’ve tried it before” metric, one that has failed countless people time and again. Crappy OG is still garbage even if you are an OG lover, and a perfectly grown Gelato is still amazing even in a market flooded with inferior-grown Gelato phenotypes. In fact I believe most often people fall in love with a strain because they had a chance to taste an exceptionally-grown version of it as one of their first experiences with that cultivar. As a cultivator, I can definitely tell you one of the best things you can hear from a consumer is that they’ve never had a specific strain in that way before. That’s when the producer takes the quality and puts it centerfold, above and beyond any preconceptions about the strain, reshaping the experience altogether. 

None of this is to say there’s anything wrong with preference; I myself have my own go-to’s. I’m saying that finding the best-quality version of what you love will elevate it to a higher level than ever before. And to chase quality, we need standards. Without them, we’re stuck, chained to an endless loop of hype, forever consuming subpar weed in pursuit of the latest flavor of the week, just so we can think we are za za boyzz. 

  1. THC content hype has essentially ruined both the legal and legacy market. Most of the current breeders don’t have terpene content reports or anything else to add to the information offered about their products. They all advertise a questionable THC content and pile on the hype words, but otherwise no useful information for people trying to research their alternatives in the market.

    I’d love to find myself in a certified lab setting again soon.

  2. I agree with the THC content. The original reason breeders such as pioneers like Neville started growing and breeding high THC strains to begin with was for a few reasons. One to be able to consume less product without taxing the lungs as much and two more THC per product the less risk of weight versus criminal laws. However that also started the race for higher potency to create the lastest and greatest trends like the article stated, it’s like a fashion trend with different names for practically all the same cannabis.

  3. just another propaganda piece by CANNABIS RETAILER HIGH TIMES to bash their competition. Since they started selling pot high times has done nothing but bash everyone else. I’M SURE that soon *objective* articles about the quality ans brilliance of high times branded smoke will follow soon.

    You gave up ANY small measure of journalistic integrity when you started selling the stuff you supposedly rate.

  4. I grow different strains as we like the different highs they offer. I never judge how good my smoke is even though I test the thc levels and maintain a watchful eye on the grow. I trust the input I get from the people I know. They ask me how is it? It gets me high is all I say you be the judge. As far as the color of the ash. At one time I was old school white ash was the rule. As my smoking of different strains and better understanding of the process of growing, drying, and curing led to higher yields, higher thc content, and better cannbis all around. I tell people research and then fo more. What works for some may not work for you.

  5. Well why aren’t things like that Canabis cup Being judged over a certain period of time then over one night. It should be. Maybe judges get sent unknown strains Marked ABC123 to get a fair assessment of each and every strain. That’s the only way you could do it to judge the true effects. I would be happy to do that if I was a judge.

  6. Like it or not business will dictate production. Cheap labor and high yield salts will dominate the bulk of the market and price out the living soil models.

    Only a small fraction of people appreciate TRUE living soil products without ANY fertilizer during the growing cycle. This method is low yield and has a high expense. It will never compete in the bulk market, it will only be a small niche for the pickiest end users

  7. 👏 Yes, thanks for saying this! I am in the Denver area and I can’t count how many times I’ve purchased herb from a new dispo with mostly positive online reviews only to come home with rock-hard, dry, crumbly buds, with practically no trichs that have “30% thc” and tastes like garbage. The beer brewers here have standards, the food industry too! Why are we smoking so much trash cannabis and praising bad growers here?!

  8. While I agree with the author’s analysis of the industry as a whole, I debate the efficacy of raising connoisseurs to celebrity status. We already have enough influencers, has beens, and clout chasers pushing their opinions onto the hype train. We’d just be creating a pedestal to put people on that only seek more money and influence for themselves.

    What we really need, in my opinion, are celebrity educators. We need a Bill Nye, or Niel Degress Tyson(sp). We need to promote and market individuals that have zero ulterior motives. If we really want to decrease hype, and focus on the real quality of cannabis, we need folks who will take cannabis education mainstream. To make learning about cannabis fun and something the average consumer is interested in. Only then will we be able to move past consumers using THC test results as a metric of quality, and for colors to fall back to what they were originally, colors. We as a community may need to design a new metric of quality as well, one that takes all qualities of cannabis into consideration, terps and all cannabinoids together.

    Lastly, and this is extremely important, we need to remember that this industry is now run strictly based on money instead of passion. We should really start focusing on promoting small growers who look to improve cannabis and the community as a whole, rather than chasing money strictly. We’re already at the breaking point of having states run by essentially what is megacorps like Walmart and Amazon of weed, as far as production quantity goes. We need to take an active stance to promote smaller grows before they get wiped out of the legal markets due to the big guys.

  9. In the completely illegal days, someone once asked ex-NORML Director Richard Cowan why he traveled all the way to Amsterdam to smoke marijuana. He answered: “I don’t go for the marijuana. I go for the freedom.”

    It’s not just new consumers that like the legal stores. ALL ages love them. – The story you have written could have easily been written by illegal moon-shiners before alcohol prohibition was repealed. – But try to find some black-market moonshine now. I’ve never seen it.

    You seem untrustworthy anyway when you talk about “vapegate.” Do you not realize hundreds of people were seriously injured and many DIED because of those tainted, black-market vapes? – That was no hoax. Shame on you for painting it as such.

    You demonstrate why we need to leave all the black-market behind. You probably are part of the greedy sellers who fought against legalization, too. We had to fight those traitors in every state that has legalized marijuana. They don’t care about the freedom of the “precious” customers. They only care about hanging on to their quasi-monopolies and outrageously high prices.

    I hope to NEVER buy from the black-market again. — Again, shame on you for this deception. Get a job in the legal industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Read More

Self-Care Sundaze

Comedian Mike Glazer walks you through how he takes care of his mental wellbeing in this week’s WEIRDOS.
Read More

NOT TRAPPED: the Hesh take.

The infamous multihyphenate shares his thoughts on being young and black in and around the cannabis industry.
Read More

The Weirdos State of the Union

To celebrate the second birthday of WEIRDOS, our VP of Content waxes on the year we’ve had, and where we’re going from here.
Read More

Brand Aids

Some reflections on creating a weed brand in an oversaturated market hanging on by a thread.