Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

High Times


Washington MD Ad Ban Deemed Unconstitutional

It is unconstitutional for the state of Washington to ban the use of advertising by physicians to promote services pertaining to medical marijuana. This is the verdict of a Pierce County Superior Court judge, who claims a law imposed by the state that explicitly forbids the medical community from advertising medical marijuana is a breach of the First Amendment.

Judge Elizabeth Martin filed the ruling last week, concluding that while the state may have legal basis to regulate advertising used by medical professionals, prohibiting it altogether violates freedom of speech. “I find the statute impermissibly overbroad as it chills even informational speech aimed solely at public education,” Martin wrote in her decision.

The verdict stems from a case in which the Department of Health penalized Dr. Scott Havsy, a well-established osteopath, for marketing himself as a liberal distributor of medical marijuana recommendations. His attorney, Mark Olsen, argued the state ban on advertising prevents patients from connecting with qualified physicians.

“The only restrictions that should be placed on professional advertising are to be sure the advertising is not false or misleading,” said Olson. “Other than that, when the government restricts advertising by professionals, it places a chilling effect on the free flow of information, especially on the Internet.”

The opposition came in with all guns blazing, arguing that free speech was not protected in the case of advertisements promoting “an illegal product or activity.” Assistant Attorney General Joyce Roper said: “Dr. Havsy cannot claim constitutionally protected commercial speech in his advertisement for the medical use of marijuana because marijuana is illegal under federal law and the medical use of marijuana remains illegal under state law.”

The judge sided with the defense, ruling the state’s advertising restrictions to be “far more extensive than necessary” and a hindrance to patients interested in exploring treatment with medical marijuana from being made aware “as to whether that provider is even available or willing to perform the required medical exam for the certificate of use.”

Judge Martin admits that Washington is in the midst of a “grand national experiment” with regard to legal marijuana, and does not expect her ruling to be the “final word on the subject.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


HT Newsletter

Subscribe for exclusive access to deals, free giveaways and more!

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.


You May Also Like


In the 1990s, Howard Stern was already firmly on board with cannabis legalization.


In his annual State of the State address, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo proposed legalizing the sale of cannabis products to individuals over the...


Illinois' neighboring states of Iowa, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri have yet to legalize recreational marijuana, while Michigan already has.


The lack of testing facilities could slow down retail sales.


Virginia attorney general Mark Herring wants the Commonwealth to legalize marijuana. This week, he brought lawmakers together to discuss why.


Now that the long wait is over, the bureaucracy can begin.


The online seminar will be powered by real-life law enforcement experience.


The MORE Act would allow states to craft their own marijuana regulations.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!