The Washington Examiner reported that he told an audience at a clinic in Cleveland: “If it turns out that there is something in smoked marijuana that helps people, that’s awesome. I will be the last person to stand in the way of that… But let’s run it through the Food and Drug Administration process, and let’s stick to the science on it.”
Former Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, appearing along with Rosenberg, added: “Should we be reducing the administrative and other barriers to researching that in the government? 100 percent. But what we should not do is make policies based on guesswork. When we do that, what we do is put people at risk.”
This is all outrageous hypocrisy.
Surely Murthy is aware of the Catch-22: Government bodies like the National Institutes of Health won’t fund the very studies he is calling for due to the cannabis’ illegality. Nonetheless, there have certainly been studies—no “guesswork” is needed.
The Hill pointed out that results of a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial were just recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, finding that administration of the cannabinoid CBD significantly reduces seizure frequency in children with an otherwise drug-resistant form of epilepsy.
The findings prompted the study’s lead author, Orrin Devinsky of New York University’s Langone Medical Center, to pronounce: “Cannabis is approved in 20 countries for spasms in multiple sclerosis, so to say there’s no evidence of efficacy is simply untrue… They have to de-schedule this drug. It’s just not fair to the research and clinical communities, or to the patients. It’s medieval.”
Ironically, the government has at times actually recognized such research on the medicinal value of cannabis and cannabinoids.
In 2003, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services secured a patent—number 6630507—for the use of cannabinoids as antoxidants and neuroprotectants, with potential application in fighting cancer and degenerative diseases. Yet in 2006, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration memo reiterated the official dogma that cannabis has “no medical value.”
This is bureaucratic schizophrenia, which can only be overcome by freeing up the research and taking oversight out of the hands of the DEA, a law enforcement body.
The House bill to remove cannabis from the “schedule list” of controlled substances entirely could accomplish this. The good news is that it actually has a Republican sponsor, Rep. Tom Garrett of Virginia. But whether it can muster enough votes to survive a presidential veto seems dubious—and advocates are still waiting for a coherent Trump position on cannabis.
Canada Estimates $1 Billion in Legal Cannabis Sales in First Three Months
New Zealand City Has 10 Synthetic Cannabis Overdoses in 48 Hours
Billboards Urge Utah to Vote for Medical Marijuana by Quoting Mormon Scripture
Governor of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Legalizes Cannabis
Culture6 days ago
First Ever Trial to Study the Effects of Microdosing LSD Began This Month
CBD7 days ago
Coca-Cola in Talks to Make the Next CBD-Infused Beverage
Health7 days ago
Adderall and Weed: Learn More About the Combo
Guides5 days ago
What Do The Colors of Marijuana Mean?
Health6 days ago
Tobacco vs. Weed: The Differences, Pros, and Cons
Medical Marijuana5 days ago
Canadian Cannabis Company Tilray to Export Products to United States
News6 days ago
South African Court Rules Private, Adult-Use Cannabis is Legal
Health6 days ago
Study Finds Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Youth More Likely to Use Multiple Substances