Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Laws

U.S. House Votes to Curb Civil Asset Forfeiture

Photo by Getty Images

In a surprising move, the House of Representatives approved an amendment that will roll back Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ asset forfeiture plan that would have allowed law enforcement to seize cash and property from people suspected of illegal activity but who had not necessarily been charged, much less convicted, of any crime.

Amendment number 126 of the House bill, sponsored by a bipartisan group of nine members, was approved by a virtually unanimous voice vote.

This move will defund the federal asset forfeiture program that Sessions was eager to reinstate after Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder had curtailed the practice, although he had definitely not abolished it.

In other words, approval of the amendment puts the brakes on Sessions and Trump’s obsession with rolling back, or totally eliminating, any and all of Obama’s reforms.

Sessions’ plan to revive the Justice Department’s so-called Equitable Sharing Program are dashed for now.

The program had allowed state and local law enforcement agencies to take an 80 percent kickback from the seizure of civil assets they carried out. This essentially gave cops a huge incentive to knock down doors and steal private citizens’ property and money.

This corrupt practice served as a way for local police and other agencies to avoid state laws that were designed to limit asset forfeiture.

While the legal origins of civil asset forfeiture go back a long way in U.S. history, the modern version was revived during the cocaine wars of the mid-1980s.

Indeed, Americans lose more property to police seizures than to robbers, according to the Washington Post. In the last decade alone, almost $28 billion worth of cash and property has been seized in this way.

In fact, the DEA seems to rely on asset forfeiture

The Justice Department’s inspector general noted this past March that DEA agents had seized $4 billion in cash during the past decade from travelers—under the pretext of drug-related asset forfeiture.

In more than 81 percent of the cases reviewed, there were no criminal charges filed.

It’s about time to put an end to all forms of this abusive practice, which is nothing more than highway robbery.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

HT Newsletter

Subscribe for exclusive access to deals, free giveaways and more!

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

Advertisement

You May Also Like

Politics

What exactly does a cannabis czar do?

Politics

Members of Congress are calling for federal aid for cannabis businesses.

Medical Marijuana

There is no disputing that cannabis provides medicinal relief to scores of people. However, federal regulations limit the scope of testing for marijuana recommended...

News

The DEA seems to be advancing plans to expand medical marijuana research.

Legalization

More than half of the United States has passed some sort of legislation.

News

Presidential hopeful Senator Gillibrand has a plan.

News

2020 Presidential hopeful and former Obama VP Joe Biden doesn't support legalizing cannabis, but he wants to decriminalize it, fund research and promote criminal...

Laws

Does the STATES Act stand a chance at being signed into law?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!