‘Peyote Crisis’ Threatens Sacred Native American Ceremonies

The sanctity of Native American religious rites involving peyote faces new risks from not only recreational users, but pharmaceutical companies.
peyote
Shutterstock

Native American and preservationist advocates are sounding the alarm about an imminent “peyote crisis.” The crisis started decades ago, but recently has been amplified by pharmaceutical interests in mescaline, the psychoactive compound the cactus is known for.

The mescaline-rich spineless cactus, Lophophora williamsii, has been used in sacred rituals for over 5,000 years by American indigenous cultures, but through careless harvesting by recreational users, or worse, mass produced pharmaceutical companies, all of that could soon be lost. In the U.S. the cactus only grows wild in Texas—where it’s been declared an endangered species—as well as Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León, and Tamaulipas in northern Mexico.

The cactus is currently being monetized for either pharmaceutical or recreational use, and indigenous groups like the Native American Church (NAC) are concerned that the sacred plant is being exploited. In the December 1977 issue of High Times, journalist J. F. Burke wrote about his journey with peyote that started in 1957, one of the first in-depth articles about the plant, just as the federal government was making exemptions for a short list of Native Americans. Since then, a lot of hippies, psychonauts, and wannabe shamans have scoured the earth looking for ways to find it.

The American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. § 1996.) protects the rights of Native Americans to exercise their traditional religions–including psychedelic sacraments. On Dec. 22, 1981, the Department of Justice reiterated the DEA’s peyote exemption for the NAC, but only bona fide members of the church are included. Only allowing that single church was challenged in 1994 under Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. Thornburgh and Congress amended the American Indian Religious Freedom Act to legalize peyote use by all members of Native American tribes.

Vice reported last September Canada-based Lophos Pharma, a publicly-traded company, started to produce the psychoactive cactus for pharmaceutical, not spiritual purposes. Lophos runs a 10,000-square foot facility in Napanee, Ontario. Mescaline itself is illegal under Schedule III of the Canadian drug act, peyote is permitted, so long as the mescaline isn’t extracted from it. But some say even medical purposes are not the way the cactus should be consumed, as it’s considered sacred.

Peyote Advocates Push Back

Colorado-based journalist Annette McGivney has recently been advocating for the preservation of peyote and the sacred ceremonies that surround it.

McGivney told KJZZ that she visited with the two camps of people: “One is, you know, the plant medicine activists and then the pharmaceutical entrepreneurs, so the plant medicine activists had two different responses,” she said. “One was they were totally oblivious to the Native American worldview and why it would not be OK with them for someone to just grow a peyote cactus in their home greenhouse. They had no idea or they were coming up with their own justification saying, ‘Well, it’s not interfering with Native American spirituality because we’re growing the cactus ourselves. So we’re not taking it away from its natural habitat.’ And they kind of come up with their own justification, ignoring what Native Americans were actually saying, that that was a problem.”

Companies like Lophos Pharma, which is growing peyote legally in Canada, as well as researchers in the U.S. are also a threat to the sanctity Native American religious ceremonies.

“And then the pharmaceutical industry has their own justifications about why they’re not infringing on Native American spirituality, which is they’re using synthetic mescaline. So they’re creating chemical compounds in a lab that clone the cactus, the psychoactive substance. So they’re saying that’s OK because we’re not actually using the cactus, but for Native Americans and their worldview around interconnectedness and respecting the sovereignty of plants as well as humans. They say it’s not OK to clone our sacred cactus.”

Last month McGivney also wrote for The Guardian about the same issue. In Window Rock, Arizona, members of the Navajo Nation, called the Diné partake of azeé (peyote). “How would Christians feel if Jesus Christ was cloned?” Justin Jones, a Diné peyote practitioner and legal counsel for the NAC asked The Guardian. “And while the real Jesus is protected, people could do whatever they wanted to the clone.”

The NAC is the same church Burke explored in the 1950’s. Other Native American healers and shamans echoed the same response, saying that cloning or mass-producing peyote is fundamentally wrong from their context.

“I’m all for healing,” said Cora Maxx-Phillips, a social worker, member of the Navajo Nation human rights commission and board member of the Council of Peyote Way of Life Coalition, a Navajo Nation grassroots group. “But don’t do it at the expense of our people, who are trying to survive the multigenerational trauma inflicted upon us. Please, leave us alone.”

Total
0
Shares
3 comments
  1. WTF
    Sorry but Annette McGivney is very confused about science and becuase of this her arguments about native religious sanctity don’t hold up at all; in fact they’re non-sensical (and i am not arguing against someone’s right to believe in the religious ‘sanctity’ of a plant).
    Quoting McGivney:
    “And then the pharmaceutical industry has their own justifications about why they’re not infringing on Native American spirituality, which is they’re using synthetic mescaline. So they’re creating chemical compounds in a lab that clone the cactus, the psychoactive substance. So they’re saying that’s OK because we’re not actually using the cactus, but for Native Americans and their worldview around interconnectedness and respecting the sovereignty of plants as well as humans. They say it’s not OK to clone our sacred cactus.”
    HERE’S SOME FACTS:
    (1)The peyote plant (Lophophopra williamsii) naturally clones itself in the wild, as do most cacti.
    (2)Growing and/or cloning a peyote plant (as Lophos Pharma is doing) has nothing to do with synthesising mescaline from chemicals, unless you’re referring to the peyote plant synthesising its mescaline from chemicals using enzymes.
    … And finally is McGivney suggesting that the peyote consumers who eat it for religious ‘justifiactions’ both object to other people growing and consuming peyote for their own reasons as well as object to other people consuming mescaline even where it’s artifically synthesised?
    I personally take offence at that attitude and believe that’s a very righteous as well as self-centered stance to take regarding a plant that their own god supposedly created specifically for man as per genesis in the bible.
    All of humankind ‘owns’ all species of plants, whether or not you think creator made them for us and PLANT CULTIVATION IS A TOOL THAT AIDS IN THE CONSERVATION OF PLANTS!!!

  2. TO PUT IT ANOTHER WAY:
    Hypothetically, would it be justified if a religious group claimed that Cannabis sativa was ‘their’ sacrament and that no-one else should grow it or consume it?

    Worth noting too is that practitioners of the Native American Church also cultivate peyote for their use and this often no doubt involves taking cuttings i.e. cloning the peyote plants!

    … And finally I don’t hear members of the Huichol, Cora and Tarahumara tribes or the Peyote Way Church of God (all of whom use peyote as a religious sacrament) complaining about other people using their sacrament; though those Mexican tribes probably have a hard enough time dealing with murderous drug cartels operating on their land.

  3. Why can’t the white man leave native Americans alone why do they think they have the right to destroy everything natives believe in .white man ain’t God..you don’t have the right to push your way in on them and do everything you e already done. May God have mercy on all of you..y’all are just wrong. There is no argument back off leave them alone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Dallas
Read More

Leaders in Dallas, Texas Pursue Cannabis Decriminalization

Amidst other cities that have already passed cannabis decriminalization in Texas, the city council in Dallas is working on its own initiative to prevent police from arresting people with four ounces of cannabis or less.
Total
0
Share