How to Diversify the Legal Marijuana Market

By
Jon Gettman

African-Americans are having a hard time getting into the legal marijuana business. It’s wrong, and there is a simple solution to the problem—but it’s a solution that remains impractical in the current political environment.

The marijuana industry is tightly regulated in many states; this has become an absolute requirement to build political support for legalization through either the initiative or legislative process. In many states, market access is controlled though strict limits on the number of licenses that will be granted for cultivation and/or retail dispensaries.

According to the Washington Post, “Many states bar convicted drug felons from the industry, disproportionately hurting minorities because of historically higher conviction rates. Others have set high investment requirements. Some dole out licenses through appointed commissions that industry researchers say reward the politically connected, who by and large are wealthy and white.”

In Maryland, the state has granted 15 companies licenses to grow marijuana for the state’s new medical marijuana program, and none of them are led by African-Americans.

Last week, Baltimore Circuit Court Judge Barry Williams held a hearing on the issue in response to a lawsuit alleging that regulators did not consider racial diversity in awarding the licenses.

Meanwhile, the city of Oakland has implemented a new process to close the racial disparity gap in its medical marijuana industry, offering applicants a series of incentives to help address factors that have obstructed minority access to the growing marijuana industry.

Another argument pushed by those fighting for greater minority participation in the legal marijuana market is that prohibition has disproportionately affected African Americans. The Associated Press recently used this narrative to frame their examination of efforts in six states (including Maryland and California) to encourage minority participation in the industry.

It’s as if it’s OK to limit access to the market, but also that African-Americans deserve some of the bounty from such limits, as reparations for being victimized by the War on Drugs in such a disproportionate manner over the years.

African-Americans have been victimized by marijuana prohibition; racial disparities in marijuana possession arrests have been widely reported in the last several years (in part due to research by this author.) They deserve a chance to profit from the legal marijuana market, just like anyone else.

So, here’s a radical idea.

Legalize marijuana, but don’t over-regulate it.

That’s the approach recommended by this author and the late Michael Kennedy, then director of Trans-High Corporation and the High Times Growth Fund in a report entitled, “Let it Grow: The Open Market Solution to Marijuana Control,” published in the Harm Reduction Journal.

Simply put, both society and marijuana consumers are better served by an open, free market than an over-regulated market designed to limit participation and artificially inflate the price of marijuana.

In addition to addressing public policy concerns, such as elimination of the black market, restricting teenage market access and enhancing consumer safety, an open market also provides for free competition in ways that eliminate many of the current obstacles to African-American participation.

A free market is a diverse market, in which success is based on merit and competence, rather than imperfect selection criteria and political connections.

It’s not okay to limit access to the legal marijuana market. African-Americans deserve equal access to the market, and so do all Americans.

Let the market grow; it’s time to embrace the open market solution to marijuana legalization.

Jon Gettman

Jon Gettman is the Cannabis Policy Director for High Times. Jon has a Ph.D. in public policy, teaching undergraduate criminal justice and graduate level management courses. A long-time contributor to High Times, his research and analytical work has been used by NORML, Marijuana Policy Project, American’s for Safe Access, the Drug Policy Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union and other organizations. Jon’s research contributions to the topic of marijuana law reform have included findings on the economic value of domestic marijuana cultivation, attempts to have marijuana rescheduled under federal law and racial disparities in marijuana possession arrest rates. Serving as NORML’s National Director in the late 1980s, he was instrumental in creating NORML’s activist program.

By
Jon Gettman

Recent Posts

Cannabis Community, Investors React to DEA Decision To Reschedule

Cannabis advocates hailed the DEA’s decision to reclassify marijuana under federal drugs laws, although many…

4 hours ago

Ohio GOP Lawmakers Debate Adult-Use MJ Priorities, Eye June for Regulation Approval

Ohio's recreational market remains in limbo, for now.

4 hours ago

Georgia Governor Signs Bill Establishing Licensing Requirements To Grow Hemp

The governor of Georgia signed a series of bills aimed at bolstering the state’s agriculture…

4 hours ago

Study: Psilocybin Enhances Meditation

For those seeking enlightenment through meditation, psilocybin might do the trick.

4 hours ago

Taylor Swift Puts Narcotics Into All of Her Songs on ‘The Tortured Poets Department’

On her latest album, the megastar is more open about substance abuse than ever before.

4 hours ago

MedMen Files for Bankruptcy

The once prominent cannabis company has now entered receivership, and its assets and operations will…

1 day ago