New Study Indicates Cannabis Users Are Not More Likely To Be Injured On The Job

A new study supports cannabis users' claims that their use of the plant does not impair their work.

By
Thomas Edward

A new study offers support to pot smokers who have long insisted that their habit doesn’t prevent them from doing their jobs.

The findings, published in the May issue of Substance Use and Misuse, indicated that marijuana users were no more likely to suffer injuries on the job than their colleagues who do not use pot.

“The current body of evidence does not provide sufficient evidence to support the position that cannabis users are at increased risk of occupational injury,” wrote the researchers, who work at the University of British Columbia. “Further, the study quality assessment suggests significant biases in the extant literature are present due to potential confounding variables, selection of participants, and measurement of exposures and outcomes.”

The study consisted of a review of literature examining “the potential link between cannabis use and occupational injury,” by appraising “all available current literature from five databases, following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines.” 

The researchers said that seven of the 16 reviewed studies that they appraised “show evidence supporting a positive association between cannabis use and occupational injury,” while one “shows evidence supporting a negative association and the remaining eight studies show no evidence of a significant relation.” 

They said the impetus for the study was that a “range of nations, including countries of the European Union, Australia, and the Americas have recently implemented or proposed reforms to how they control cannabis use, thereby departing from traditional approaches of criminal prohibition that have dominated throughout most of the twentieth century.” 

“Given these policy developments and the widespread global use of cannabis, it is critically important to understand the possible risks associated with cannabis use in relation to major societal harms,” they wrote.

Cannabis and the Workplace

The findings were trumpeted by NORML, which is opposed to marijuana testing by employers. Some cities—including most recently New York—have adopted laws banning employers from testing employees for marijuana. 

“Suspicionless marijuana testing never has been an evidence-based policy. Rather, these discriminatory practices are a holdover from the zeitgeist of the 1980s ‘war on drugs,’” said NORML’s Deputy Director Paul Armentano. “But times have changed; attitudes have changed, and in many places, the marijuana laws have changed. It is time for workplace policies to adapt to this new reality.”

Thomas Edward

High Times Writer.

View Comments

By
Thomas Edward
Tags: Workplace

Recent Posts

Cannabis Community, Investors React to DEA Decision To Reschedule

Cannabis advocates hailed the DEA’s decision to reclassify marijuana under federal drugs laws, although many…

19 hours ago

Ohio GOP Lawmakers Debate Adult-Use MJ Priorities, Eye June for Regulation Approval

Ohio's recreational market remains in limbo, for now.

19 hours ago

Study: Psilocybin Enhances Meditation

For those seeking enlightenment through meditation, psilocybin might do the trick.

19 hours ago

Georgia Governor Signs Bill Establishing Licensing Requirements To Grow Hemp

The governor of Georgia signed a series of bills aimed at bolstering the state’s agriculture…

19 hours ago

Taylor Swift Puts Narcotics Into All of Her Songs on ‘The Tortured Poets Department’

On her latest album, the megastar is more open about substance abuse than ever before.

19 hours ago

MedMen Files for Bankruptcy

The once prominent cannabis company has now entered receivership, and its assets and operations will…

2 days ago